Soft Tissue Movement in Orthognathic Surgery: Does Pre-Operative Soft Tissue Thickness Affect Movement Change?

Background: The aim of this study was to examine whether the thickness of the preoperative soft tissue affects the degree of soft tissue movement relative to the hard tissue movement after orthognathic surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective examination of lateral cephalometric X-rays of patients who underwent orthognathic surgery in single medical center, during a 5-year period. Demographic and operative data were collected. Soft tissue thickness was measured in preoperative cephalometric X-ray, followed by superimposition of postoperative (>6 months) cephalometric X-rays by overlapping fixed bony points. Results: In the upper jaw, there was a decrease in the relative movement of soft tissue with an increase in the initial thickness in surgeries performing advancements up to 5 mm (r = −0.288). In mandibular advancements, there was a clear decrease in soft tissue movement ratio with an increase in the initial soft tissue thickness (r = −0.418), while there was no correlation in mandibular setback cases (r = 0.062). The same correlation between the decrease in relative soft tissue movement and the increase in initial soft tissue thickness was found in advancement genioplasty (r = −0.411). Conclusion: This research shows a general pattern of decrease in relative movement of soft tissue in orthognathic surgery correlated to an increase in its initial thickness.

[1]  J. Kim,et al.  Submandibular soft tissue changes after mandibular set-back surgery in skeletal Class III patients. , 2019, Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  M. Koudstaal,et al.  How accurate is the soft tissue prediction of Dolphin Imaging for orthognathic surgery. , 2019, International orthodontics.

[3]  M. Mommaerts,et al.  A systematic review of soft-to-hard tissue ratios in orthognathic surgery. Part IV: 3D analysis - Is there evidence? , 2017, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[4]  T. Koga,et al.  Soft tissue changes after a mandibular osteotomy for symmetric skeletal class III malocclusion , 2017, Odontology.

[5]  M. Mommaerts,et al.  A systematic review of soft-to-hard tissue ratios in orthognathic surgery. Part III: Double jaw surgery procedures. , 2016, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[6]  M. Mommaerts,et al.  A systematic review on soft-to-hard tissue ratios in orthognathic surgery part II: Chin procedures. , 2015, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[7]  M. Mommaerts,et al.  A systematic review on soft-to-hard tissue ratios in orthognathic surgery part I: maxillary repositioning osteotomy. , 2014, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[8]  O. Kolokitha,et al.  Factors Influencing the Accuracy of Cephalometric Prediction of Soft Tissue Profile Changes Following Orthognathic Surgery , 2012, Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery.

[9]  O. Kolokitha,et al.  Cephalometric Methods of Prediction in Orthognathic Surgery , 2011, Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery.

[10]  M. Chew,et al.  Evaluation of the linearity of soft- to hard-tissue movement after orthognathic surgery. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  H. Friede,et al.  Mandibular setback osteotomy: facial soft tissue behavior and possibility to improve the accuracy of the soft tissue profile prediction with the use of a computerized cephalometric program: Quick Ceph Image Pro: v. 2.5. , 1999, Clinical orthodontics and research.

[12]  A E Athanasiou,et al.  Soft-tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  Joanne D. Subtelny,et al.  A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures , 1959 .

[14]  J. Miguel,et al.  Life-quality of orthognathic surgery patients: The search for an integral diagnosis , 2014, Dental press journal of orthodontics.

[15]  Gundega Jakobsone,et al.  Soft tissue thickness changes after correcting Class III malocclusion with bimaxillar surgery. , 2011, Stomatologija.

[16]  A. Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Soft tissue profile changes after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback: a systematic review. , 2010, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[17]  L. Bailey,et al.  Long-term soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery. , 1996, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.