Auburn University

Estimation of the employment effects of changes in capital investment is a standard tool in public policy debates. Typically, such predictions are based on employment multipliers derived from Input-Output analysis. In this paper, we measure the employment effects of changes in capital investment in the U.S. information sector by econometrically estimating an “employment multiplier” from historical data. The estimated multiplier is 10 information sector jobs for each million dollars in expenditure, and perhaps 24 new jobs per million dollars invested across the entire economy. Employment multipliers derived from the Input-Output methodology average about 16 jobs per million, but the multiplier includes jobs outside the information sector. Including employment spillovers, our estimates suggest the multipliers from Input-Output models are plausible. We also note that information sector jobs have substantially higher median earnings than the private sector average, so the economic significance of changes in information sector employment are greater than might first appear. Our findings may be useful in debates over changes in industry regulation that could affect investment.

[1]  R. M. Beemiller,et al.  Regional multipliers: A user handbook for the regional input-output modeling system (RIMS II). Second edition , 1992 .

[2]  Y. Shin,et al.  Generalized Impulse Response Analysis in Linear Multivariate Models , 1998 .

[3]  Kenneth J. Boudreaux DISCOUNTS AND PREMIUMS ON CLOSED‐END MUTUAL FUNDS: A STUDY IN VALUATION , 1973 .

[4]  Joon Y. Park Canonical Cointegrating Regressions , 1992 .

[5]  John R. Nofsinger,et al.  Herding and Feedback Trading by Institutional and Individual Investors , 1999 .

[6]  Peter C. B. Phillips,et al.  Optimal Inference in Cointegrated Systems , 1991 .

[7]  W. Baumol,et al.  A key role for input-output analysis in policy design , 1994 .

[8]  H. Rosen,et al.  An Econometric Technique versus Traditional Techniques for Obtaining Regional Employment Multipliers: A Comparative Study , 1973 .

[9]  Hyeongwoo Kim Generalized impulse response analysis: General or Extreme? , 2013 .

[10]  J. PrattEugene Myths Associated with Closed-End Investment Company Discounts , 1966 .

[11]  Ling Hu,et al.  Robust estimation for structural spurious regressions and a Hausman-type cointegration test , 2005 .

[12]  Mark W. Watson,et al.  A SIMPLE ESTIMATOR OF COINTEGRATING VECTORS IN HIGHER ORDER INTEGRATED SYSTEMS , 1993 .

[13]  C. Granger,et al.  Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing , 1987 .

[14]  J. Bai,et al.  A Panic Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration , 2001 .

[15]  Martin E. Zweig AN INVESTOR EXPECTATIONS STOCK PRICE PREDICTIVE MODEL USING CLOSED‐END FUND PREMIUMS , 1973 .

[16]  Jerome L. Stein,et al.  Behavior of the Firm Under Regulatory Constraint , 1972 .

[17]  James H. Stock,et al.  Asymptotic Properties of Least Squares Estimators of Cointegrating Vectors , 1987 .