Performance of temperate aerobic rice under different water regimes in North China

Abstract Since the late 1990s, aerobic rice varieties have been released to farmers in the North China Plain to grow rice as a supplementary-irrigated upland crop to cope with water scarcity. Little is known about their yield potential, water use, water productivity (WP), and flood tolerance. In 2001–2002, experiments with aerobic rice varieties HD502 and HD297 and lowland rice variety JD305 were conducted under aerobic and flooded conditions. Under aerobic conditions, five irrigation treatments were implemented. Under flooded conditions, JD305 yielded up to 8.8 t ha −1 , HD502 up to 6.8 t ha −1 , and HD297 up to 5.4 t ha −1 . Under aerobic conditions, the aerobic varieties yielded higher than the lowland variety. HD502 produced 3–3.5 t ha −1 with 450–500 mm total water input and 5.3–5.7 t ha −1 with 650 mm water input and more. HD297 produced 3–3.5 t ha −1 with 450–500 mm total water input and 4.7–5.3 t ha −1 with 650 mm water input and more. The water productivity of aerobic rice under aerobic conditions was higher or on a par with that of the lowland variety under flooded conditions, reaching values of 0.6–0.8 g grain kg −1 water. The relatively high yields of the aerobic varieties under aerobic soil conditions were obtained under “harsh” conditions for growing rice. The soil contained more than 80% sand, was permeable, and held water above field capacity for a few hours after irrigation only. The groundwater table was deeper than 20 m, the soil moisture content in the rootzone was mostly between 50 and 80% of saturation, and soil moisture tension went up to 90 kPa. We conclude that the aerobic rice varieties HD502 and HD297 are suitable for water-scarce environments, and can stand being periodically flooded.

[1]  B. Bouman,et al.  On-farm strategies for reducing water input in irrigated rice; case studies in the Philippines , 2002 .

[2]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  A Sustainable Agro-ecological Solution to Water Shortage in the North China Plain (Huabei Plain) , 2001 .

[3]  R. G. Smith,et al.  Growth and yield of rice under sprinkler irrigation on a free-draining soil , 1985 .

[4]  R. Barker,et al.  The outlook for water resources in the year 2020: challenges for research on water management in rice production. , 2000 .

[5]  Y. Li,et al.  Research and practice of water saving irrigation for rice in China , 2001 .

[6]  M. Westcott,et al.  A Comparison of Sprinkler and Flood Irrigation for Rice1 , 1986 .

[7]  D. F. Cox,et al.  Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. , 1984 .

[8]  G. McCauley,et al.  Sprinkler vs. Flood Irrigation in Traditional Rice Production Regions of Southeast Texas , 1990 .

[9]  B. Bouman,et al.  Water-wise rice production , 2002 .

[10]  B. Bouman,et al.  Field water management to save water and increase its productivity in irrigated lowland rice , 2001 .

[11]  B. Bouman,et al.  Performance of aerobic rice varieties under irrigated conditions in North China , 2006 .

[12]  H. Tao Yield and nitrogen uptake of lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) in a water-saving ground cover rice production system (GCRPS) in Beijing, North China , 2006 .

[13]  B. Bouman Water-efficient management strategies in rice production , 2001 .

[14]  B. Bouman,et al.  Effect of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia , 2004 .