Evaluation of breast amorphous calcifications by a computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a direct computer-aided detection (d-CAD) system integrated with full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in assessment of amorphous calcifications. METHODS From 1438 consecutive stereotactic-guided biopsies, FFDM images with amorphous calcifications were selected for retrospective evaluation by d-CAD in 122 females (mean age, 56 years; range, 35-84 years). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and false-positive rate of the d-CAD system were calculated in the total group of 124 lesions and in the subgroups based on breast density, mammographic lesion distribution and extension. Logistic regression analysis was used to stratify the risk of malignancy by patient risk factors and age. RESULTS The d-CAD marked all (36/36) breast cancers, 85% (11/13) of the high-risk lesions and 80% (60/75) of benign amorphous calcifications (p<0.01) correctly. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for the combined malignant and "high-risk" lesions was 96, 80 and 86%, respectively. The likelihood of malignancy was 29%. There was no significant difference between the marking of fatty or dense breasts (p>0.05); however, d-CAD marks showed differences for small (<7 mm) lesions (p=0.02) and clustered calcifications (p=0.03). The false-positive rate of d-CAD was 1.76 marks per full examination. CONCLUSION The d-CAD system correctly marked all biopsy-proven breast cancers and a large number of biopsy-proven high-risk lesions that presented as amorphous calcifications. Given our 29% likelihood of malignancy, imaging-guided biopsy appears to be a reasonable recommendation in cases of amorphous calcifications marked by d-CAD.

[1]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Mammography with computer-aided detection: reproducibility assessment initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[2]  Jay A Baker,et al.  Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: variability in cues. , 2004, Radiology.

[3]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[4]  Jeffrey W Hoffmeister,et al.  Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Martin P DeSimio,et al.  A computer-aided detection system for the evaluation of breast cancer by mammographic appearance and lesion size. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  L. Tabár,et al.  Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[7]  Mary Scott Soo,et al.  Computer-aided detection of amorphous calcifications. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  M. J. Yaffe,et al.  Screening Mammography-detected Cancers: Sensitivity of a Computer-aided Detection System Applied to Full-Field Digital Mammograms , 2008 .

[9]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views. , 2006, Radiology.

[10]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .

[11]  Joachim Böttcher,et al.  Effect of Breast Density on Computer Aided Detection , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[12]  L. Cupples,et al.  Quantitative analysis of allele imbalance supports atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions as direct breast cancer precursors , 2006, The Journal of pathology.

[13]  Mythreyi Bhargavan,et al.  Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. , 2001, Radiology.

[14]  H. Bu,et al.  Evidence of chromosomal alterations in pure usual ductal hyperplasia as a breast carcinoma precursor. , 2008, Oncology reports.

[15]  Ian O Ellis,et al.  The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) – current definitions and classification , 2003, Breast Cancer Research.

[16]  D. Berry,et al.  Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer , 2005 .

[17]  Jeffrey W Hoffmeister,et al.  Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer‐aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology , 2005, Cancer.

[18]  Jeffrey W Hoffmeister,et al.  Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  D. Ikeda,et al.  Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. , 2001, Radiology.

[20]  B. Deyarmin,et al.  Timing of Critical Genetic Changes in Human Breast Disease , 2005, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  H. Nelson,et al.  Screening for Breast Cancer , 2003 .

[22]  Frank J. H. M. van den Biggelaar,et al.  Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[23]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. , 2007, Radiology.

[24]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[25]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[26]  M A Helvie,et al.  Women with breast cancer: histologic findings in the contralateral breast. , 1997, Radiology.

[27]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  Ingvar Andersson,et al.  Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials , 2002, The Lancet.

[29]  W. T. Ho,et al.  Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. , 2003, Clinical Radiology.

[30]  W A Kaiser,et al.  Reproducibility--an important factor determining the quality of computer-aided detection (CAD) systems. , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[31]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.