A generalized autoassociator model for face processing and sex categorization: From principal compon

A generalized autoassociator model for face processing and sex categorization: From principal components to multivariate analysis. ABSTRACT In this paper we propose a generalized version of the classical linear au-toassociator that can be shown to implement a generalized least-squares approximation under linear constraints. The standard linear autoassociator is known to implement principal component analysis, whereas the generalized model implements the general linear model (e.g., canonical correlation). In practical terms, this generalization allows for the imposition of a priori constraints that enable diierential weighting of both individual units of the input code and individual stimuli. As an illustration of the utility of the generalized model, we present simulations comparing the accuracy and learning speed of the standard and generalized versions of the autoasso-ciator for the problem of categorizing faces by sex. We show that while the two models are equally accurate, the generalized model learns the task considerably faster than does the standard model.

[1]  Stephen A. Ritz,et al.  Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: some applications of a neural model , 1977 .

[2]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Principal Component and Neural Network Analyses of Face Images: Explorations into the Nature of Information Available for Classifying Faces by Sex , 1996 .

[3]  Wesley R. Elsberry,et al.  Optimality in Biological and Artificial Networks , 1997 .

[4]  Suzanne Winsberg,et al.  Metric scaling correspondence analysis , 1992 .

[5]  D. Levine Introduction to Neural and Cognitive Modeling , 2018 .

[6]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Multivariate Analysis , 1958, Nature.

[7]  A. J. O'toole,et al.  Classifying faces by face and sex using an autoassociative memory trained for recognition , 1991 .

[8]  L Sirovich,et al.  Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  Y. Takane Book Review : Elements of Dual Scaling: An Introduction to Practical Data Analysis , 1994 .

[10]  J. H. Wilkinson The algebraic eigenvalue problem , 1966 .

[11]  A J O'Toole,et al.  More about the Difference between Men and Women: Evidence from Linear Neural Networks and the Principal-Component Approach , 1995, Perception.

[12]  Robert M. Nosofsky,et al.  Exemplar-based approach to relating categorization, identification, and recognition , 1992 .

[13]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Hervé Abdi,et al.  A NEURAL NETWORK PRIMER , 1994 .

[15]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Multidimensional models of categorization. , 1992 .

[16]  R. Clarke,et al.  Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis , 1985 .

[17]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Connectionist models of face processing: A survey , 1994, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  A. M. Burton,et al.  What's the Difference between Men and Women? Evidence from Facial Measurement , 1993, Perception.

[19]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Associative memory. A system-theoretical approach , 1977 .

[20]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry , 1969 .

[21]  H. Ellis,et al.  Parallel processing of the sex and familiarity of faces. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.