Triple-objective Team Mentoring: Achieving Learning Objectives with Chemical Engineering Students

Abstract A sophisticated style of mentoring has been found to be essential to support engineering student teams undertaking technically demanding, real-world problems as part of a Project-Centred Curriculum (PCC) at The University of Queensland. The term ‘triple-objective’ mentoring was coined to define mentoring that addresses not only the student's technical goal achievement but also their time and team management. This is achieved through a number of formal mentor meetings that are informed by a confidential instrument which requires students to individually reflect on team processes prior to the meeting, and a checklist of technical requirements against which the interim student team progress and achievements are assessed. Triple-objective mentoring requires significant time input and coordination by the academic but has been shown to ensure effective student team work and learning undiminished by team dysfunction. Student feedback shows they value the process and agree that the tools developed to support the process are effective in developing and assessing team work and skills with average scores mostly above 3 on a four-point scale.

[1]  T. Campbell,et al.  Faculty/Student Mentor Program: Effects on Academic Performance and Retention , 1997 .

[2]  J. Reavell,et al.  Institution of Chemical Engineers , 1930 .

[3]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone , 1999 .

[4]  Sue Gordon,et al.  You Should--I Should: Mentoring Responsibilities as Perceived by Faculty, Alumni, and Students. , 2006 .

[5]  Stephen Ekwaro-Osire.  'Pan-Mentoring' as an Effective Element of Capstone Design Courses* , 2003 .

[6]  K. Kram.  Phases of the mentor relationship. , 1983 .

[7]  Eugene M. Anderson,et al.  Toward a Conceptualization of Mentoring , 1988 .

[8]  T. Bauer,et al.  Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes , 2006 .

[9]  Russell L. Pimmel.  A practical approach for converting group assignments into team projects , 2003, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[10]  Caroline Crosthwaite,et al.  Balancing Curriculum Processes and Content in a Project Centred Curriculum: In Pursuit of Graduate Attributes , 2006 .

[11]  Nigel Spinks,et al.  Educating Engineers for the 21st Century: The Industry View , 2006 .

[12]  Caroline Crosthwaite,et al.  Curriculum Design for Chemical Engineering Graduate Attributes , 2000 .

[13]  K. Smith.  Cooperative learning: Making “groupwork” work , 1996 .

[14]  Berwyn Clayton,et al.  Assessing and certifying generic skills: what is happening in vocational education and training? , 2003 .

[15]  Patricia Cartney,et al.  The emotional impact of learning in small groups: highlighting the impact on student progression and retention , 2006 .

[16]  Bob Lonne,et al.  An innovative use of the web to build graduate team skills , 2006 .

[17]  Patrick Ainley,et al.  Vocational education and training , 1990 .

[18]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Social Loafing: a Meta-analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[19]  J. Moy.  The Impact of Generic Competencies on Workplace Performance. Review of Research. , 1999 .

[20]  Rebecca Strachan,et al.  A novel approach to teaching teamwork , 2006 .

[21]  Leonard Springer,et al.  Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[22]  Flora McMartin.  Building Better Teamwork Assessments: A Process For Improving The Validity And Sensitivity Of Self/Peer Ratings , 1999 .