Two Distinct Mechanisms of Suppression in Human Vision

Cortical visual neurons in the cat and monkey are inhibited by stimuli surrounding their receptive fields (surround suppression) or presented within their receptive fields (cross-orientation or overlay suppression). We show that human contrast sensitivity is similarly affected by two distinct suppression mechanisms. In agreement with the animal studies, human surround suppression is tightly tuned to the orientation and spatial frequency of the test, unlike overlay suppression. Using a double-masking paradigm, we also show that in humans, overlay suppression precedes surround suppression in the processing sequence. Surprisingly, we find that, unlike overlay suppression, surround suppression is only strong in the periphery (>1° eccentricity). This result argues for a new functional distinction between foveal and peripheral operations.

[1]  J. Ross,et al.  Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Length and width tuning of neurons in the cat's primary visual cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Movshon,et al.  Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  A. B. Bonds.  Role of Inhibition in the Specification of Orientation Selectivity of Cells in the Cat Striate Cortex , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[6]  C. Koch,et al.  Flanker effects in peripheral contrast discrimination—psychophysics and modeling , 2001, Vision Research.

[7]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  D. Heeger,et al.  Center-surround interactions in foveal and peripheral vision , 2000, Vision Research.

[9]  J. Rovamo,et al.  An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  S. Klein,et al.  Cross- and iso- oriented surrounds modulate the contrast response function: the effect of surround contrast. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[11]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[12]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Organization of suppression in receptive fields of neurons in cat visual cortex. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  R. Snowden,et al.  The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination , 1998, Vision Research.

[14]  C. Tyler,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold , 1999, Vision Research.

[15]  G. Sperling,et al.  The lateral inhibition of perceived contrast is indifferent to on-center/off-center segregation, but specific to orientation , 1993, Vision Research.

[16]  Christof Koch,et al.  Attentional effects on contrast detection in the presence of surround masks , 2000, Vision Research.

[17]  M. Carandini,et al.  Masking by fast gratings. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[18]  J. Movshon,et al.  Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  John M. Foley,et al.  Pattern detection: interactions between oriented and concentric patterns , 2004, Vision Research.

[20]  Mark W. Cannon,et al.  Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: Inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial frequencies, spatial positions and orientations , 1991, Vision Research.

[21]  John Ross,et al.  The effects of adaptation and masking on incremental thresholds for contrast , 1993, Vision Research.

[22]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Disinhibition Outside Receptive Fields in the Visual Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  D. Burr,et al.  Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells. I. Neurophysiological evidence , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[24]  P Perona,et al.  Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  D. Fitzpatrick.  Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[26]  Z Li,et al.  Pre-attentive segmentation in the primary visual cortex. , 1998, Spatial vision.

[27]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[28]  M. Carandini.  Receptive fields and suppressive fields in the early visual system , 2004 .

[29]  D. Heeger,et al.  Measurement and modeling of center-surround suppression and enhancement , 2001, Vision Research.

[30]  J A Solomon,et al.  Texture interactions determine perceived contrast , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  H. Wilson,et al.  Lateral interactions in peripherally viewed texture arrays. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.