Katydid synchronous chorusing is an evolutionarily stable outcome of female choice

IN many animals that use rhythmic acoustic or bioluminescent sexual communication, neighbouring males precisely synchronize their signals1–4. This event has previously been interpreted as a development whereby cooperative individuals benefit from maintenance of species-specific signalling rates5,6, minimization of predation risks7,8, or maximization of peak signal amplitude of a local population2,9. Our recent findings on chorusing in the neotropical katydid Neoconocephalus spiza (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae), however, refute for this species all three hypotheses that claim that synchrony is adaptive. Instead, we demonstrate that synchrony can be an epiphenomenon created by competitive interactions between males jamming each other's signals. The mechanism generating this interference is shown to be an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) maintained under sexual selection for exploiting a critical psychoacoustic feature: females orienting toward signalling males choose the leading call in a closely synchronized sequence.

[1]  F E Hanson,et al.  Synchrony and Flash Entrainment in a New Guinea Firefly , 1971, Science.

[2]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[3]  Gilbert B. Waldbauer,et al.  Insects, Science, and Society , 1976 .

[4]  J. E. Lloyd,et al.  Model for the Mating Protocol of Synchronously Flashing Fireflies , 1973, Nature.

[5]  G. K. Morris,et al.  Bat Predation and Its Influence on Calling Behavior in Neotropical Katydids , 1987, Science.

[6]  Thomas A. Sebeok,et al.  How Animals Communicate , 1979 .

[7]  G. K. Morris,et al.  Orthopteran mating systems : sexual competition in a diverse group of insects , 1983 .

[8]  R R Hoy,et al.  The evolutionary convergence of hearing in a parasitoid fly and its cricket host. , 1992, Science.

[9]  Michael D Greenfield Evolution of Acoustic Communication in the Genus Neoconocephalus: Discontinuous Songs, Synchrony, and Interspecific Interactions , 1990 .

[10]  J. G. Morin Symposium: Insect Behavioral Ecology--85: "Firefleas" of the Sea: Luminescent Signaling in Marine Ostracode Crustaceans , 1986 .

[11]  T. J. Walker,et al.  Acoustic Synchrony: Two Mechanisms in the Snowy Tree Cricket , 1969, Science.

[12]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek , 1991, Nature.

[13]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Interspecific acoustic interactions among katydids Neoconocephalus: inhibition-induced shifts in diel periodicity , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  E. Sismondo,et al.  Synchronous, Alternating, and Phase-Locked Stridulation by a Tropical Katydid , 1990, Science.

[15]  T. Burk Symposium: Insect Behavioral Ecology--'81: Evolutionary Significance of Predation on Sexually Signalling Males , 1982 .

[16]  Richard D. Alexander,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION AND SPECIALIZED CHORUSING BEHAVIOR IN ACOUSTICAL INSECTS , 1975 .

[17]  J. Buck,et al.  Toward a Functional Interpretation of Synchronous Flashing by Fireflies , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Albert D. Carlson,et al.  Flash Communication in Fireflies , 1985, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[19]  K. Wells The social behaviour of anuran amphibians , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.