Attitudes toward Computer Synthesized Speech

[1]  C. Carver,et al.  Favorable evaluations of Blacks and the handicapped: Positive prejudice, unconscious denial, or social desirability? , 1978 .

[2]  C. Nass,et al.  When a Talking-Face Computer Agent Is Half-Human and Half-Humanoid: Human Identity and Consistency Preference. , 2007 .

[3]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Source Orientation in Human-Computer Interaction , 2000, Commun. Res..

[4]  K. Hilari,et al.  Social support in people with chronic aphasia , 2006 .

[5]  C. W. Gorenflo,et al.  The effects of information and augmentative communication technique on attitudes toward nonspeaking individuals. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  G D Allen,et al.  Segmental intelligibility and speech interference thresholds of high-quality synthetic speech in presence of noise. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  Steven E. Stern,et al.  Positive Prejudice Toward Disabled Persons Using Synthesized Speech , 2007 .

[8]  D. Ruscello,et al.  Classroom Teachers' Attitudes toward Children with Articulatory Disorders , 1983, Perceptual and motor skills.

[9]  Janice Light,et al.  “Communication is the essence of human life”: reflections on communicative competence , 1997 .

[10]  Steven E. Stern,et al.  The Persuasiveness of Synthetic Speech versus Human Speech , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[11]  M L Rice,et al.  Influence of communicative competence on peer preferences in a preschool classroom. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  Jack S. Damico,et al.  Access and social inclusion in aphasia: Interactional principles and applications , 2007 .

[13]  Joanne Lasker,et al.  Peers' perceptions of storytelling by an adult with aphasia , 1999 .

[14]  K. Harber.  Feedback to minorities: evidence of a positive bias. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  B. Brinton,et al.  Social Behaviors of Children With Language Impairment on the Playground: A Pilot Study. , 2001, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[16]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[17]  Donald Fucci,et al.  Synthetic speech intelligibility under several experimental conditions , 1995 .

[18]  Anne O'Connor,et al.  Children's attitudes toward a nonspeaking child using various augmentative and alternative communication techniques , 1993 .

[19]  C. Nass,et al.  Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[20]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Segmental intelligibility of synthetic speech produced by rule. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  C. Sigelman,et al.  Children's nonverbal responses to a physically disabled person , 1986 .

[22]  Steven E. Stern,et al.  Computer-Synthesized Speech and Perceptions of the Social Influence of Disabled Users , 2008 .

[23]  T. Feustel,et al.  Capacity Demands in Short-Term Memory for Synthetic and .Natural Speech , 1983, Human factors.

[24]  Robert G. Frank,et al.  Social and interpersonal reactions to depression and disability. , 1990 .

[25]  Janice Light,et al.  Attitudes toward Individuals Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Research Review , 2005 .

[26]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  A comparison of intelligibility among natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listeners from three age groups , 1990 .

[27]  C. Crandall,et al.  A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  R. Antonak,et al.  The Influence of Attitudes and Contact on Reactions to Persons with Physical and Speech Disabilities. , 1992 .

[29]  Daniel W. Gorenflo,et al.  Effects of synthetic speech, gender, and perceived similarity on attitudes toward the augmented communicator , 1997 .

[30]  Steven E. Stern,et al.  Social perception of male and female computer synthesized speech , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Pat Mirenda,et al.  Toward Functional Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Students With Autism: Manual Signs, Graphic Symbols, and Voice Output Communication Aids. , 2003, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[32]  C. Judd,et al.  Framing interethnic ideology: effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  E. Alant,et al.  Interaction between a teacher and the non-speaking as well as speaking children in the classroom. , 1997, The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings.

[34]  Ann R. Beck,et al.  Attitudes of children toward a similar-aged child who uses augmentative communication , 1996 .

[35]  M. Cruice,et al.  Quantifying aphasic people's social lives in the context of non‐aphasic peers , 2006 .

[36]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computers be teammates? , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[37]  C. Nass,et al.  How “Real” Are Computer Personalities? , 1996 .

[38]  Erna Alant,et al.  Attitudes of children toward an unfamiliar peer using an AAC device with and without voice output , 2002 .

[39]  Avoidance of the handicapped: an attributional ambiguity analysis. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Steven E. Stern,et al.  Sex Differences in Persuadability of Human and Computer-Synthesized Speech: Meta-Analysis of Seven Studies , 2004, Psychological reports.

[41]  Ilya Yaroslavsky,et al.  Persuasion and social perception of human vs. synthetic voice across person as source and computer as source conditions , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[42]  S A Duffy,et al.  Comprehension of Synthetic Speech Produced by Rule: A Review and Theoretical Interpretation , 1992, Language and speech.

[43]  Mabel L. Rice,et al.  Social biases toward children with speech and language impairments: A correlative causal model of language limitations , 1993, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[44]  D. Harper.  Presidential address: Social psychology of difference: Stigma, spread, and stereotypes in childhood. , 1999 .

[45]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups , 1987 .

[46]  Ann R. Beck,et al.  The influence of information and role-playing experiences on children's attitudes toward peers who use AAC. , 2003, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[47]  Steven E Stern,et al.  Effects of perceived disability on persuasiveness of computer-synthesized speech. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The Case for Caring Colearners: The Effects of a Computer‐Mediated Colearner Agent on Trust and Learning , 2007 .

[49]  C. W. Gorenflo,et al.  Effects of synthetic voice output on attitudes toward the augmented communicator. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[50]  E. Makas.  Positive Attitudes toward Disabled People: Disabled and Nondisabled Persons' Perspectives. , 1988 .

[51]  Li Gong,et al.  To Mix or Not to Mix Synthetic Speech and Human Speech? Contrasting Impact on Judge-Rated Task Performance versus Self-Rated Performance and Attitudinal Responses , 2003, Int. J. Speech Technol..

[52]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Magic and cost of communicative competence , 1991 .

[53]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  The “Black Sheep Effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification , 1988 .

[54]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Processing Rational and Emotional Messages: The Cognitive and Affective Mediation of Persuasion , 1995 .