Nonspatial Cueing of Tactile STM Causes Shift of Spatial Attention

The focus of attention can be flexibly altered in mnemonic representations of past sensory events. We investigated the neural mechanisms of selection in tactile STM by applying vibrotactile sample stimuli of different intensities to both hands, followed by a symmetrically shaped visual retro-cue. The retro-cue indicated whether the weak or strong sample was relevant for subsequent comparison with a single tactile test stimulus. Locations of tactile stimuli were randomized, and the required response did not depend upon the spatial relation between cued sample and test stimulus. Selection between spatially segregated items in tactile STM was mirrored in lateralized activity following visual retro-cues (N2pc) and influenced encoding of task-irrelevant tactile probe stimuli (N140). Our findings support four major conclusions. First, retrospective selection results in transient shifts of spatial attention. Second, retrospective selection is functionally dissociable from attention-based rehearsal of locations. Third, selection mechanisms are linked across processing stages, as attention shifts in STM influence encoding of sensory signals. Fourth, selection in tactile STM recruits attentional control mechanisms that are, at least partially, supramodal.

[1]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Interactions between working memory, attention and eye movements. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[2]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Attentional modulation of the human somatosensory evoked potential in a trial-by-trial spatial cueing and sustained spatial attention task measured with high density 128 channels EEG. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[3]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Maintenance of tactile short-term memory for locations is mediated by spatial attention , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[4]  Bettina Forster,et al.  Sustained Spatial Attention in Touch: Modality-Specific and Multimodal Mechanisms , 2011, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[5]  Helge Gillmeister,et al.  ERP investigation of transient attentional selection of single and multiple locations within touch. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[6]  R. Knight,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of working memory: Contributions of human brain lesion studies , 2006, Neuroscience.

[7]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  On the origin of event-related potentials indexing covert attentional selection during visual search. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Verleger,et al.  Spatiotemporal overlap between brain activation related to saccade preparation and attentional orienting , 2006, Brain Research.

[11]  J Debecker,et al.  Wave form and neural mechanism of the decision P350 elicited without pre-stimulus CNV or readiness potential in random sequences of near-threshold auditory clicks and finger stimuli. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Covert attention in touch: behavioral and ERP evidence for costs and benefits. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[13]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Selection within visual memory representations activates the oculomotor system , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  B. Forster,et al.  Hands behind your back: effects of arm posture on tactile attention in the space behind the body , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle. , 2009, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[17]  A. Nobre,et al.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Blind separation and blind deconvolution: an information-theoretic approach , 1995, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[19]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[20]  P. Michie,et al.  The effects of spatial selective attention on the somatosensory event-related potential. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[21]  Helge Gillmeister,et al.  Object-guided Spatial Attention in Touch: Holding the Same Object with Both Hands Delays Attentional Selection , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Edward Awh,et al.  The Role of Spatial Selective Attention in Working Memory for Locations: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  E. Vogel,et al.  Interactions between attention and working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[24]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[26]  J. Bisley The neural basis of visual attention , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[28]  A van Oosterom,et al.  Overlap of attention and movement-related activity in lateralized event-related brain potentials , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  T. Pasternak,et al.  Working memory in primate sensory systems , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The spatial distribution of attentional selectivity in touch: evidence from somatosensory ERP components , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  A. Nobre,et al.  Cognitive control of attention in the human brain: Insights from orienting attention to mental representations , 2006, Brain Research.

[32]  M. Eimer,et al.  Modulations of early somatosensory ERP components by transient and sustained spatial attention , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Mark G. Stokes,et al.  Attention Modulates Maintenance of Representations in Visual Short-term Memory , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Temporal dynamics of lateralized ERP components elicited during endogenous attentional shifts to relevant tactile events. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[35]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Crossmodal links in spatial attention are mediated by supramodal control processes: evidence from event-related potentials. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[36]  L. Nyberg,et al.  Common fronto-parietal activity in attention, memory, and consciousness: Shared demands on integration? , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[37]  C. Curtis,et al.  Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Early posterior ERP components do not reflect the control of attentional shifts toward expected peripheral events. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[39]  Jöran Lepsien,et al.  Searching for Targets within the Spatial Layout of Visual Short-Term Memory , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Common Anatomical and External Coding for Hands and Feet in Tactile Attention: Evidence from Event-related Potentials , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Anterior and posterior attentional control systems use different spatial reference frames: ERP evidence from covert tactile-spatial orienting. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[44]  S. Luck,et al.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  D Robertson,et al.  Differential enhancement of early and late components of the cerebral somatosensory evoked potentials during forced‐paced cognitive tasks in man , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[47]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The attentional selection of spatial and non-spatial attributes in touch: ERP evidence for parallel and independent processes , 2004, Biological Psychology.

[48]  A. Nobre,et al.  Spatial selection of features within perceived and remembered objects , 2009, NeuroImage.

[49]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[50]  A. Gazzaley Influence of early attentional modulation on working memory , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  Roy Luria,et al.  Orienting attention to objects in visual short-term memory , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Inhibition of saccadic eye movements to locations in spatial working memory , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[53]  Fred Tam,et al.  Functional MRI of working memory and selective attention in vibrotactile frequency discrimination , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[54]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Effects of hand posture on preparatory control processes and sensory modulations in tactile-spatial attention , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[56]  Bettina Forster,et al.  ERP correlates of tactile spatial attention differ under intra- and intermodal conditions , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[57]  C. Shagass,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potential changes with a selective attention task. , 1982, Psychophysiology.

[58]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  A. Jha,et al.  Tracking the time-course of attentional involvement in spatial working memory: an event-related potential investigation. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[60]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Common mechanisms of spatial attention in memory and perception: a tactile dual-task study. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[61]  C. Schroeder,et al.  The Leading Sense: Supramodal Control of Neurophysiological Context by Attention , 2009, Neuron.

[62]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  No functional role of attention-based rehearsal in maintenance of spatial working memory representations. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[63]  M Corbetta,et al.  Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems? , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.