Why spending more might get you less, dynamic selection of influencers in social networks

Many studies in the field of information spread through social networks focus on the detection of influencers. The spread dynamics in most of these studies assumes these influencers are first selected and "infected" with a message, and then this message spreads through the networks by a viral process. The following work presents some difficulties with this separation between the infection stage and the viral stage, and provides a case where an increased effort spent on the spread of an idea results in lower final rates of spread. Such results can be prevented by the Scheduling Seeding approach. This approach gradually plans the timing of infection for each particular node as the viral process progresses. It outperforms the initial seeding approach, and prevents the occurrence of the counter-intuitive (and unwanted) results where a greater effort results in a less successful spread. A simple but effective heuristics to detect what node to seed and where is provided.

[1]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[2]  Paulo Shakarian,et al.  A scalable heuristic for viral marketing under the tipping model , 2013, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[3]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  S. Milgram BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  I. N. A. C. I. J. H. Fowler Book Review: Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. , 2009 .

[6]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The role of social networks in information diffusion , 2012, WWW.

[7]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network , 2008, WWW.

[8]  S. Asch Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments , 1951 .

[9]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Patterns of Cascading Behavior in Large Blog Graphs , 2007, SDM.

[10]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Engineering Social Contagions: Optimal Network Seeding in the Presence of Homophily , 2013 .

[11]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle , 2009, KDD.

[12]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Inferring networks of diffusion and influence , 2010, KDD.

[13]  Darrell M. West Air Wars: Television Advertising and Social Media in Election Campaigns, 1952-2012 , 2013 .

[14]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The Anatomy of Large Facebook Cascades , 2013, ICWSM.

[15]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[16]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..

[17]  Justin Cheng,et al.  Rumor Cascades , 2014, ICWSM.

[18]  Hung-Lin Fu,et al.  Optimal detection of influential spreaders in online social networks , 2016, 2016 Annual Conference on Information Science and Systems (CISS).

[19]  Daniel G. Goldstein,et al.  The structure of online diffusion networks , 2012, EC '12.

[20]  P. Howard,et al.  Opening Closed Regimes: What Was the Role of Social Media During the Arab Spring? , 2011 .

[21]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Improving information spread through a scheduled seeding approach , 2015, 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[22]  X. Bosch The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil , 2007 .