The Effects of Auditory Structural Complexity on Attitudes, Attention, Arousal, and Memory

Twenty-five participants listened to 8 radio messages—half of which were greater in auditory structural complexity. Physiological measures were taken during message presentation, and self-report measures after each. Results show that increased auditory structural complexity led to higher self-reported and physiological arousal, better attitudes toward the messages overall and toward their nonclaim components. There were no differences in attitudes toward the claims made in the messages at each level of structural complexity. Structurally complex messages were also freely recalled more often than simple messages. The prediction that messages high in auditory structural complexity would result in greater self-reported attention levels received only moderate support. Furthermore, high levels of auditory structural complexity resulted in unexpectedly higher cardiac activity compared to messages low in structural complexity.

[1]  Annie Lang,et al.  Packaging Television News: The Effects of Tabloid on Information Processing and Evaluative Responses , 2000 .

[2]  Ellen Wartella,et al.  A Cognitive Developmental Study of Children's Attention To Television Commercials , 1974 .

[3]  Annie Lang,et al.  The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television messages , 1999 .

[4]  Paul D. Bolls,et al.  The Effects of Message Valence and Listener Arousal on Attention, Memory, and Facial Muscular Responses to Radio Advertisements , 2001, Commun. Res..

[5]  Toni Campbell,et al.  Communicating More than Content: Formal Features of Children's Television Programs , 1981 .

[6]  Annie Lang,et al.  The Effects of Related and Unrelated Cuts on Television Viewers' Attention, Processing Capacity, and Memory , 1993 .

[7]  Byron Reeves,et al.  Negative video as structure: Emotion, attention, capacity, and memory , 1996 .

[8]  Annie Lang,et al.  Sensation Seeking, Motivation, and Substance Use: A Dual System Approach , 2005 .

[9]  E. Thorson,et al.  The Effects of Television Videographics and Lecture Familiarity on Adult Cardiac Orienting Responses and Memory , 1992 .

[10]  M. Dawson,et al.  The electrodermal system , 2007 .

[11]  Annie Lang,et al.  The limited capacity model of mediated message processing , 2000 .

[12]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[13]  Annie Lang,et al.  The Effects of Edits on Arousal, Attention, and Memory for Television Messages: When an Edit Is an Edit Can an Edit Be Too Much? , 2000 .

[14]  M. Zuckerman.  Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking , 1994 .

[15]  P. Lang.  Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications , 1980 .

[16]  R. Simons,et al.  Roll ‘em!: The effects of picture motion on emotional responses , 1998 .

[17]  N. Ravaja.  Contributions of Psychophysiology to Media Research: Review and Recommendations , 2004 .

[18]  G. Vossel,et al.  Finally, After Two Decades , 2001 .

[19]  James H. Watt,et al.  An Information Theory Measure for Television Programming , 1974 .

[20]  L. Gross,et al.  The demonstration of power: violence profile no. 10. , 1979, The Journal of communication.

[21]  R. Lutz.  Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the ad : A conceptual framework , 1985 .

[22]  Eugene B. Zechmeister,et al.  Human memory, an introduction to research and theory , 1982 .

[23]  Paul D. Bolls,et al.  Identifying Structural Features of Audio , 2008, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[24]  M. Meldman.  Attention, Arousal and the Orientation Reaction , 1967 .

[25]  Leo Bogart,et al.  The Age of Television , 1959 .

[26]  N.G.R. Iyengar,et al.  Elasto-plastic analysis of adhesive bonded joint , 1993 .

[27]  Paul D. Bolls,et al.  I Can Hear You, but Can I See You? , 2002, Commun. Res..

[28]  Robert F. Potter,et al.  The Effects of Voice Changes on Orienting and Immediate Cognitive Overload in Radio Listeners , 2000 .

[29]  J. Russell,et al.  An approach to environmental psychology , 1974 .

[30]  M. Bradley,et al.  Remembering pictures: pleasure and arousal in memory. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Seth Geiger,et al.  The Effects of Scene Changes and Semantic Relatedness on Attention to Television , 1993 .

[32]  Esther Thorson,et al.  Attention to Local and Global Complexity in Television Messages , 1987 .

[33]  Robert F. Potter,et al.  Sounds Exciting!!: The Effects of Auditory Complexity on Listeners' Attitudes and Memory for Radio Promotional Announcements , 2000 .

[34]  Byron Reeves,et al.  The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal Media Psychology , 1999 .

[35]  Leo Bogart,et al.  The Age of Television , 1957 .

[36]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[37]  Robert D. Hare,et al.  Sensation seeking and psychophysiological responses to auditory stimulation. , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[38]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[39]  M. Dawson,et al.  Is elicitation of the autonomic orienting response associated with allocation of processing resources? , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[40]  Annie Lang,et al.  The effects of arousal on liking and believability of commercials , 1998 .