Recently, a new Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) from optical stereo data acquired by the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) was released with the resolution of 1 arc sec. In this study, the performance of the new ASTER GDEM is assessed by comparing with SRTM (the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) and point data from ICESat/GLAS (Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite/ Geoscience Laser Altimeter System). A 5°×5° area (30°-35°N, 110°-115°E) with varied terrain was chosen as the study area. Standard DEM-to-DEM comparison, DEM-to-control-point comparison and visual analysis were used to evaluate the ASTER GDEM quality. The results show that the ASTER GDEM has much fewer voids than SRTM V2 (the version 2 SRTM). The ASTER GDEM has lower elevations (approximately −5m) compared with SRTM, whereas the ASTER GDEM has higher elevations (approximately 15m) compared with ICESat/GLAS points. To the vertical accuracy, the results of the ASTER GDEM compared with SRTM V4 (the version 4 SRTM), SRTM V2 and ICESat/GLAS points are 39.55m, 25.99m, 33.99m at 95% confidence respectively, exceeding 20m estimated prior to the ASTER GDEM production. The poor accuracy may be related to the high terrain relief and high ratio of lower stack number of the ASTER GDEM in the study area. The ASTER GDEM shows better performance in the flat areas than that in the mountainous areas, and the accuracy improves with the increasing stack number. The ASTER GDEM has many artifacts including inland water noises and straight lines related to the irregular stack number boundaries, which are caused by the methodology to produce the ASTER GDEM.
[1]
Takashi Oguchi,et al.
Comparison of new and existing global digital elevation models: ASTER G‐DEM and SRTM‐3
,
2008
.
[2]
G. Suna,et al.
Validation of surface height from shuttle radar topography mission using shuttle laser altimeter
,
2003
.
[3]
H. Zwally.
ICESat's Laser Measurements of Polar Ice and Atmospheres
,
2003
.
[4]
K. Nikolakopoulos,et al.
SRTM vs ASTER elevation products. Comparison for two regions in Crete, Greece
,
2006
.
[5]
E. Rodríguez,et al.
A Global Assessment of the SRTM Performance
,
2006
.
[6]
Adrian A. Borsa,et al.
Assessment of ICESat performance at the salar de Uyuni, Bolivia
,
2005
.
[7]
Tim R. McVicar,et al.
The impact of misregistration on SRTM and DEM image differences
,
2008
.
[8]
A. Roth,et al.
The shuttle radar topography mission—a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar
,
2003
.
[9]
D. Harding,et al.
ICESat validation of SRTM C‐band digital elevation models
,
2004
.
[10]
Hannes Isaak Reuter,et al.
An evaluation of void‐filling interpolation methods for SRTM data
,
2007,
Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..
[11]
Guoqing Sun,et al.
Validation of surface height from shuttle radar topography mission using shuttle laser altimeter
,
2003
.
[12]
S. Boles,et al.
Bias in land cover change estimates due to misregistration
,
2000
.
[13]
Feng Ling,et al.
Filling voids of SRTM with Landsat sensor imagery in rugged terrain
,
2007
.