C-arm Tomographic Imaging Technique for Nephrolithiasis and Detection of Kidney Stones

In this paper, we investigated a C-arm tomographic technique as a new three dimensional (3D) kidney imaging method for nephrolithiasis and kidney stone detection over view angle less than 180o. Our C-arm tomographic technique provides a series of two dimensional (2D) images with a single scan over 40o view angle. Experimental studies were performed with a kidney phantom that was formed from a pig kidney with two embedded kidney stones. Different reconstruction methods were developed for C-arm tomographic technique to generate 3D kidney information including: point by point back projection (BP), filtered back projection (FBP), simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART) and maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM). Computer simulation study was also done with simulated 3D spherical object to evaluate the reconstruction results. Preliminary results demonstrated the capability of our C-arm tomographic technique to generate 3D kidney information for kidney stone detection with low exposure of radiation. The kidney stones are visible on reconstructed planes with identifiable shapes and sizes.

[1]  Jun Qin,et al.  C-arm technique with distance driven for nephrolithiasis and kidney stones detection: Preliminary study , 2016, 2016 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI).

[2]  Jun Qin,et al.  Fatigue Modeling via Mammalian Auditory System for Prediction of Noise Induced Hearing Loss , 2015, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[3]  Jun Qin,et al.  Preliminary study on C-arm technique for nephrolithiasis and kidney stones detection , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM).

[4]  Michael N. Ferrandino,et al.  Radiation Exposure during the Evaluation and Management of Nephrolithiasis. , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[5]  Jun Qin,et al.  Numerical analysis of bubble dynamics in electrohydraulic and electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Biol. Drug Des..

[6]  P. Grenier,et al.  Kidney stones and imaging: What can your radiologist do for you? , 2015, World Journal of Urology.

[7]  P. Marcy,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis: an innovative tool for challenging diagnoses in urology. , 2014, Urology journal.

[8]  D. Goldfarb,et al.  Urinary stones : medical and surgical management , 2014 .

[9]  T. Yoshizumi,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis: a new technique for imaging nephrolithiasis. Specific organ doses and effective doses compared with renal stone protocol noncontrast computed tomography. , 2014, Urology.

[10]  M. Pearle,et al.  Practical controversies in medical management of stone disease , 2014 .

[11]  Shiyu Xu TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION: IMPLEMENTATION, OPTIMIZATION AND COMPARISON IN DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS , 2014 .

[12]  G. Preminger,et al.  Imaging techniques for stone disease and methods for reducing radiation exposure. , 2013, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[13]  M. Pearle,et al.  Clinical management of urolithiasis , 2013 .

[14]  Yufeng Zhou,et al.  Characteristics of the secondary bubble cluster produced by an electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripter. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[16]  H. Tiselius,et al.  Urolithiasis: Basic science and clinical practice , 2012 .

[17]  J. Denstedt,et al.  Epidemiology of Stone Disease in North America , 2012 .

[18]  Weihua Zhou,et al.  Image reconstruction and imaging configuration optimization with a novel nanotechnology enabled breast tomosynthesis multi-beam X-ray system , 2012 .

[19]  G. Beluffi Radiological imaging of the kidney , 2012, La radiologia medica.

[20]  Klaus Bacher,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in the detection of urolithiasis: Diagnostic performance and dosimetry compared with digital radiography with MDCT as the reference standard. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  P. Zhong,et al.  Effect of lithotripter focal width on stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  D. Goldfarb In the clinic. Nephrolithiasis. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[23]  G. Preminger,et al.  IMPROVEMENT IN STONE COMMINUTION OF MODERN ELECTROMAGNETIC LITHOTRIPTERS BY TANDEM PULSE SEQUENCE , 2008 .

[24]  Jun Qin Performance evaluation and design improvement of electromagnetic shock wave lithotripters , 2008 .

[25]  Ying Chen,et al.  Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications. , 2007, Medical physics.

[26]  G. Preminger,et al.  Comparison of Light Spot Hydrophone (LSHD) and Fiber Optic Probe Hydrophone (FOPH) for Lithotripter Field Characterization , 2007 .

[27]  Ying Chen Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) --- A novel imaging technology to improve early breast cancer detection: Implementation, comparison and optimization , 2007 .

[28]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[29]  J. Rakowski,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[30]  Yufeng Zhou,et al.  The Characteristics of Cavitation Bubbles Induced by the Secondary Shock Wave in an HM‐3 Lithotripter and Its Effect on Stone Comminution , 2006 .

[31]  Tao Wu,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. , 2004, Medical physics.

[32]  S. Schatzki The clinic. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  A. Kak,et al.  Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART): A Superior Implementation of the Art Algorithm , 1984, Ultrasonic imaging.