Balancing Constraints and the Sweet Spot as Coming Topics for Creativity Research

The aim of this chapter is the introduction of two new concepts, ‘balancing constraints’ and ‘the sweet spot of creativity’, as promising new paths for creativity research. This is motivated by the fact that creativity research shows a growing interest in the fundamental entwinement of constraints and creativity, with skillful and innovative handling of constraints seen as a prerequisite for apt creative performance. Based on a brief review of current disparate conceptualizations of constraints as both enablers and restrainers of creative activities, we begin by proposing the unifying concept ‘creativity constraints’ to help establish common terminological ground. Since the presence of constraints change over time, we suggest the term ‘constrainedness’ to articulate this total constraint intensity at a given time. This allows us to introduce our main contribution, the concept ‘the sweet spot’, to address the salient situations where the creative practitioner can be said to experience the ‘right’ level of constrainedness conducive to optimum creative performance. We then proceed to consider how the sweet spot can be attained by balancing constraints, i.e., by manipulating the intensity of constrainedness. More concretely, this means by hardening or softening the constraints at hand, resulting in a higher or lower level of constrainedness. Finally, we discuss how future studies can employ and inform these new concepts, which we see as potentially rich for cross-disciplinary creativity research focusing on the essential entwinement of constraints and creativity.

[1]  Balder Onarheim,et al.  Creativity from constraints in engineering design: lessons learned at Coloplast , 2012 .

[2]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[3]  Patricia D. Stokes,et al.  Using constraints to create novelty: A case study. , 2009 .

[4]  Jin Li Creativity in Horizontal and Vertical Domains , 1997 .

[5]  Mansur Darlington Cognition and the engineering design requirement , 2003 .

[6]  M. Csíkszentmihályi The domain of creativity. , 1990 .

[7]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. , 1998 .

[8]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[9]  Matthew I. Isaak,et al.  Constraints on thinking in insight and invention. , 1995 .

[10]  P. D. Stokes Creativity from Constraints: The Psychology of Breakthrough , 2005 .

[11]  Neil A. M. Maiden,et al.  Provoking Creativity: Imagine What Your Requirements Could Be Like , 2004, IEEE Softw..

[12]  Jane Darke,et al.  The primary Generator and the Design Process , 1979 .

[13]  Joseph D. Lewandowski Boxing: The Sweet Science of Constraints , 2007 .

[14]  Sharon Bailin CREATIVITY IN CONTEXT , 2002 .

[15]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Reshaping the box: creative designing as constraint management , 2010 .

[16]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[17]  Aline Chevalier,et al.  Web site designs: Influences of designer's expertise and design constraints , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  Distributed idea screening in stage–gate development processes , 2012 .

[19]  Patricia D. Stokes,et al.  Creativity from Constraints: What Can We Learn from Motherwell? From Modrian? From Klee?. , 2008 .

[20]  S. Karau,et al.  The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. , 1992 .

[21]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Decisive constraints as a creative resource in interaction design , 2014, Digit. Creativity.

[22]  Balder Onarheim,et al.  Opening and constraining: constraints and their role in creative processes , 2010, DESIRE.

[23]  George W. Furnas,et al.  From brains to branch points: cognitive constraints in navigational design , 2004 .

[24]  Don Koberg,et al.  The universal traveler , 1981 .

[25]  R. Sternberg The Nature of creativity : contemporary psychological perspectives , 1988 .

[26]  S. Mednick The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[27]  MichaelMichalko Thinkertoys: A Handbook of Creative-Thinking Techniques , 2006 .

[28]  Patricia D. Stokes,et al.  Selection, Constraints, and Creativity Case Studies: Max Beckmann and Philip Guston , 2005 .

[29]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  ? + ? = creativity. , 2018, Public health nursing.

[30]  HU Min-zhong,et al.  On Creative Cognition , 2005 .

[31]  Caneel K. Joyce The Blank Page: Effects of Constraint on Creativity , 2009 .

[32]  Eamonn O'Neill,et al.  Understanding design as a social creative process , 2005, C&C '05.

[33]  Judith Glück,et al.  How Creatives Define Creativity: Definitions Reflect Different Types of Creativity , 2002 .

[34]  Derek H. Sleeman,et al.  Constraint capture and maintenance in engineering design , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[35]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Creativity methods in interaction design , 2010, DESIRE.

[36]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  Balder Onarheim,et al.  The Ambiguous Role of Constraints in Creativity: A Cross-Domain Exploration , 2011 .

[38]  P. Johnson-Laird Freedom and constraint in creativity. , 1988 .

[39]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention , 1996 .

[40]  D. Simonton Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist , 2004 .

[41]  Charles Tijus,et al.  Problem-Solving Restructuration: Elimination of Implicit Constraints , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[42]  Bashar Nuseibeh,et al.  Requirements engineering: a roadmap , 2000, ICSE '00.

[43]  B. Schwartz The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less , 2004 .

[44]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Design requirements, epistemic uncertainty and solution development strategies in software design , 2010 .

[45]  Patricia D. Stokes,et al.  Using constraints to generate and sustain novelty. , 2007 .

[46]  Bella Martin,et al.  Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions , 2012 .

[47]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Time constraints in design idea generation , 2009 .

[48]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[49]  Mark D. Gross,et al.  Design as exploring constraints , 1985 .

[50]  Chris Andrews,et al.  Constraint and Convention: The Formalism of the Oulipo , 2003 .

[51]  Paula Alexandra Silva BadIdeas 3.0: a method for creativity and innovation in design , 2010, DESIRE.

[52]  Nathalie Bonnardel,et al.  Towards supporting evocation processes in creative design: A cognitive approach , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[53]  Joachim Funke,et al.  Thinking and problem solving , 2002 .

[54]  L. Mamykina,et al.  Collaborative creativity , 2002, CACM.

[55]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[56]  Aage U. Michelsen Theory of Constraints (TOC) , 2004 .

[57]  Keith Negus,et al.  Creativity, Communication and Cultural Value , 2004 .