Streak biases in decision making: data and a memory model

Streaks of past outcomes, for example of gains or losses in the stock market, are one source of information for a decision maker trying to predict the next outcome in the series. We examine how prediction biases based on streaks change as a function of length of the current streak. Participants experienced a sequence of 150 flips of a simulated coin. On the first of a streak of heads, participants showed positive recency, meaning that they predicted heads for the next outcome with a greater-than-baseline probability. As streak length increased, positive recency first decreased but then increased again, producing a quadratic trend. We explain these results in terms of outcome-prediction processes that are sensitive to the historical frequency of streak lengths and that make heuristic assumptions about changes in bias of the outcome-generating process (here, the coin). An ACT-R simulation captures the quadratic trend in positive recency, as well as the baseline heads bias, in two experimental conditions with different coin biases. We discuss our memory-based model in relation to a model from the domain of economics that posits explicit representation of an ''urn'' from which events are sampled without replacement.

[1]  Y. Kareev,et al.  Through a narrow window: Sample size and the perception of correlation , 1997 .

[2]  M. Rabin Inference by Believers in the Law of Small Numbers , 2000 .

[3]  Y. Kareev Seven (indeed, plus or minus two) and the detection of correlations. , 2000, Psychological review.

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS , 1971, Pediatrics.

[5]  J R Anderson,et al.  Practice and retention: a unifying analysis. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Bruce D Burns,et al.  Randomness and inductions from streaks: “Gambler’s fallacy” versus ”hot hand“ , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory , 1984 .

[8]  W. Estes,et al.  Traps in the route to models of memory and decision , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[10]  Alban D. Sorensen,et al.  On Truth and Practice. , 1905 .

[11]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[12]  Bruce D. Burns,et al.  Heuristics as beliefs and as behaviors: The adaptiveness of the “hot hand” , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Mike Fitzpatrick Choice , 2004, The Lancet.

[14]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .

[15]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Choice and Learning under Uncertainty: A Case Study in Baseball Batting , 2003 .

[16]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Cognitive Processes in Animal Behavior , 1979 .

[17]  R. Engle,et al.  The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  C. Lebiere,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Modeling Working Memory in a Unified Architecture: An ACT-R Perspective , 1999 .