Remote Center of Motion for Redundant Robotic-Assisted Ultrasound Guided Regional Anesthesia

Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) becomes a standard procedure in surgical operations and contributes to pain management; it offers the advantages of the needle and targeted nerve detection and provides the visualization of regions of interest such as anatomical structures. In UGRA, the remote center of motion (RCM) constitutes an essential issue as the anesthetist has to manipulate a needle inside the human body. However, RCM imposes a very challenging task, where it is important to ensure that the needle should move within the constraints of the insertion point in order to prevent patient harm. To respond to this need, this paper proposes a control framework for robot-assisted UGRA for physical human-robot collaboration using 7 degrees of freedom robot manipulator (Franka Emika). This paper shows a geometric method computing the intended robot’s end-effect position with respect to the RCM constraints. This method helps the anesthetist to execute a more sophisticated motion within the patient’s body with high accuracy.

[1]  O Schneider,et al.  A six-degree-of-freedom passive arm with dynamic constraints (PADyC) for cardiac surgery application: preliminary experiments. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[2]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  MARGE Project: Design, Modeling, and Control of Assistive Devices for Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2004, MICCAI.

[3]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Inverse Kinematics and Modelling of a System for Robotic Surgery , 2004 .

[4]  A. Lanfranco,et al.  Robotic Surgery: A Current Perspective , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[5]  Roger C Barr,et al.  A Computer Model of Electrical Stimulation of Peripheral Nerves in Regional Anesthesia , 2007, Anesthesiology.

[6]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  Kinematics of a Fully-Decoupled Remote Center-of-Motion Parallel Manipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2012 .

[7]  Peter Marhofer,et al.  Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: current concepts and future trends. , 2007, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  Peter Marhofer,et al.  Current concepts and future trends in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia , 2010, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[9]  Murilo M. Marinho,et al.  A programmable remote center-of-motion controller for minimally invasive surgery using the dual quaternion framework , 2014, 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[10]  Alain Delbos,et al.  Block Success Rate: A Question of Target and Definition , 2013, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[11]  A. Gray,et al.  Ultrasound-guided Regional Anesthesia: Current State of the Art , 2006, Anesthesiology.

[12]  S. Suresh,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging for Regional Anesthesia in Infants, Children, and Adolescents: A Review of Current Literature and Its Application in the Practice of Neuraxial Blocks , 2010, Anesthesiology.

[13]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Constrained Cartesian motion control for teleoperated surgical robots , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[14]  Rajnikant V. Patel,et al.  Optimal Remote Center-of-Motion Location for Robotics-Assisted Minimally-Invasive Surgery , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  J. Horn,et al.  Efficacy of computer-based video and simulation in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia training. , 2014, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[16]  Pål Johan From,et al.  Analysis of a moving remote center of motion for robotics-assisted minimally invasive surgery , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[17]  Michael D. Naish,et al.  On constrained manipulation in robotics-assisted minimally invasive surgery , 2010, 2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[18]  Nicolas Andreff,et al.  3D Path Following with Remote Center of Motion Constraints , 2016, ICINCO.