Beaked whales demonstrate a marked acoustic response to the use of shipboard echosounders

The use of commercial echosounders for scientific and industrial purposes is steadily increasing. In addition to traditional navigational and fisheries uses, commercial sonars are used extensively for oceanographic research, benthic habitat mapping, geophysical exploration, and ecosystem studies. Little is known about the effects of these acoustic sources on marine animals, though several studies have already demonstrated behavioural responses of cetaceans to shipboard echosounders. Some species of cetaceans are known to be particularly sensitive to acoustic disturbance, including beaked whales. In 2011 and 2013, we conducted cetacean assessment surveys in the western North Atlantic in which a suite of Simrad EK60 echosounders was used to characterize the distribution of prey along survey tracklines. Echosounders were alternated daily between active and passive mode, to determine whether their use affected visual and acoustic detection rates of beaked whales. A total of 256 groups of beaked whales were sighted, and 118 definitive acoustic detections were recorded. Regression analyses using generalized linear models (GLM) found that sea state and region were primary factors in determining visual sighting rates, while echosounder state was the primary driver for acoustic detections, with significantly fewer detections (only 3%) occurring when echosounders were active. These results indicate that beaked whales both detect and change their behaviour in response to commercial echosounders. The mechanism of this response is unknown, but could indicate interruption of foraging activity or vessel avoidance, with potential implications for management and mitigation of anthropogenic impacts.

[1]  A. Radford,et al.  Context-dependent impacts of anthropogenic noise on individual and social behaviour in a cooperatively breeding fish , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Peter J. Corkeron,et al.  Changes in Humpback Whale Song Occurrence in Response to an Acoustic Source 200 km Away , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  Danielle Cholewiak,et al.  Description of sounds associated with Sowerby's beaked whales (Mesoplodon bidens) in the western North Atlantic Ocean. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  P. Tyack,et al.  First direct measurements of behavioural responses by Cuvier's beaked whales to mid-frequency active sonar , 2013, Biology Letters.

[5]  A. Frantzis,et al.  Does acoustic testing strand whales? , 1998, Nature.

[6]  D. Lusseau,et al.  Managing whale-watching as a non-lethal consumptive activity , 2015 .

[7]  Dorian S. Houser,et al.  A Bandpass filter-bank model of auditory sensitivity in the humpback whale , 2001 .

[8]  Mark P. Johnson,et al.  Foraging Blainville's beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris) produce distinct click types matched to different phases of echolocation , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[9]  T. Collins,et al.  Seismic Surveys Negatively Affect Humpback Whale Singing Activity off Northern Angola , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  Olav Rune Godø,et al.  Towards an acoustic‐based coupled observation and modelling system for monitoring and predicting ecosystem dynamics of the open ocean , 2013 .

[11]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[12]  D. Nowacek,et al.  Effects of a scientific echo sounder on the behavior of short-finned pilot whales (Globicephala macrorhynchus) , 2017 .

[13]  Mark A. Weiland,et al.  200 kHz Commercial Sonar Systems Generate Lower Frequency Side Lobes Audible to Some Marine Mammals , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  Marla M. Holt,et al.  Speaking up: Killer whales (Orcinus orca) increase their call amplitude in response to vessel noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Mark P. Johnson,et al.  Echolocation clicks of free-ranging Cuvier's beaked whales (Ziphius cavirostris). , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  S. Simpson,et al.  Boat noise disrupts orientation behaviour in a coral reef fish , 2013 .

[17]  A. Thode,et al.  PAMGUARD : SEMIAUTOMATED , OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE FOR REAL-TIME ACOUSTIC DETECTION AND LOCALISATION OF CETACEANS , 2008 .

[18]  R. W. Baird,et al.  SITE FIDELITY, ASSOCIATIONS, AND MOVEMENTS OF CUVIER'S (ZIPHIUS CAVIROSTRIS) AND BLAINVILLE'S (MESOPLODON DENSIROSTRIS) BEAKED WHALES OFF THE ISLAND OF HAWAI‘I , 2007 .

[19]  Xavier Lurton,et al.  Modelling of the sound field radiated by multibeam echosounders for acoustical impact assessment , 2016 .

[20]  R. W. Baird,et al.  Understanding the impacts of anthropogenic sound on beaked whales , 2023, J. Cetacean Res. Manage..

[21]  B. Branstetter,et al.  Hearing in cetaceans: from natural history to experimental biology. , 2012, Advances in marine biology.

[22]  Qiqi Deng,et al.  Testing Two Different Doses of Tiotropium Respimat® in Cystic Fibrosis: Phase 2 Randomized Trial Results , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  D. Lusseau,et al.  The Long-term Consequences of Short-term Responses to Disturbance Experiences from Whalewatching Impact Assessment , 2007 .

[24]  S. Simpson,et al.  Noise negatively affects foraging and antipredator behaviour in shore crabs , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  P. Tyack,et al.  Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise , 2007 .

[26]  N. Makris,et al.  Low-frequency target strength and abundance of shoaling Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) in the Gulf of Maine during the Ocean Acoustic Waveguide Remote Sensing 2006 Experiment. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  C. Clark,et al.  Acoustic and behavioural changes by fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) in response to shipping and airgun noise , 2012 .

[28]  D. Ketten,et al.  Anatomical predictions of hearing in the North Atlantic right whale , 2007, Anatomical record.

[29]  I. Boyd,et al.  Field recordings of Gervais' beaked whales Mesoplodon europaeus from the Bahamas. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  W. Richardson Marine Mammals and Noise , 1995 .

[31]  S. Wasser,et al.  Evidence that ship noise increases stress in right whales , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[33]  L. Mayer Frontiers in Seafloor Mapping and Visualization , 2006 .

[34]  Kenneth G. Foote,et al.  Acoustic Methods: Brief Review and Prospects for Advancing Fisheries Research , 2009 .

[35]  D. Palka,et al.  Abundance and densities of beaked and bottlenose whales (family Ziphiidae) , 2023, J. Cetacean Res. Manage..

[36]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[37]  Craig J. Brown,et al.  A Review of Oceanographic Applications of Water Column Data from Multibeam Echosounders , 2014 .

[38]  James V. Carretta,et al.  Acoustic pingers eliminate beaked whale bycatch in a gill net fishery , 2008 .

[39]  John Atkins,et al.  Anthropogenic noise causes body malformations and delays development in marine larvae , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[40]  Walter M. X. Zimmer,et al.  Beaked whales echolocate on prey , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  I. Boyd,et al.  Vessel Noise Affects Beaked Whale Behavior: Results of a Dedicated Acoustic Response Study , 2012, PloS one.

[42]  F. De Filippis,et al.  A Selected Core Microbiome Drives the Early Stages of Three Popular Italian Cheese Manufactures , 2014, PloS one.

[43]  J. Hildebrand Anthropogenic and natural sources of ambient noise in the ocean , 2009 .

[44]  Verena M. Trenkel,et al.  Underwater acoustics for ecosystem-based management: state of the science and proposals for ecosystem indicators , 2011 .

[45]  Craig J. Brown,et al.  Benthic habitat mapping: A review of progress towards improved understanding of the spatial ecology of the seafloor using acoustic techniques , 2011 .