Evaluating the quality of work-integrated learning curricula: a comprehensive framework

There are many different forms that work-integrated learning (WIL) takes and variants go by a range of different names. Based on current literature, key dimensions, shared by the various and disparate forms of WIL curricula, were identified and operationalised in a measurement model. The key dimensions identified were: authenticity, integrated learning supports (both at university and the workplace), alignment (of teaching and learning activities and assessments with integrative learning outcomes), supervisor access and induction/preparation processes. It is suggested that variations in the way that WIL courses or subjects are designed within these dimensions are the basis for different expressions of the quality of such courses. A latent construct measurement model was developed and validated with a sample of Australian and UK students. This paper presents the model and discusses the results of the validation study. It is proposed that the measures validated in this study will be useful for evaluating a wide variety of WIL curricula.

[1]  Carol Costley,et al.  Work‐based learning assessed as a field or a mode of study , 2007 .

[2]  John Duignan,et al.  Placement and adding value to the academic performance of undergraduates: reconfiguring the architecture - an empirical investigation‘1’ , 2003 .

[3]  D. Boud,et al.  Reflection, turning experience into learning , 1985 .

[4]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Patricia Milne,et al.  A Model for Work-Based Learning , 2005 .

[6]  Peter Komisarczuk,et al.  Review of work experience in a bachelor of information technology , 2007 .

[7]  J. Biggs.  Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment , 1996 .

[8]  Mark Price,et al.  Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Role of HE and Foundation Degrees in Workforce Development. , 2007 .

[9]  Anne Venables,et al.  A Scalable and Portable Structure for Conducting Successful Year-long Undergraduate Software Team Projects , 2007, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[10]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Meeting the needs of the workplace and the learner through work‐based learning , 2007 .

[11]  L. Shulman.  Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[12]  A. Biglan.  Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. , 1973 .

[13]  P. Wright.  Industry and higher education : collaboration to improve students' learning and training , 1992 .

[14]  David Kember,et al.  Development of a Questionnaire to Measure the Level of Reflective Thinking , 2000 .

[15]  Clare Morris,et al.  Work‐based learning , 2010 .

[16]  Rebecca A. Thacker,et al.  Revising the HR curriculum: an academic/practitioner partnership , 2002 .

[17]  Dale M. Holt,et al.  Developing professional expertise in the knowledge economy: integrating industry-based learning with the academic curriculum in the field of information technology , 2004 .

[18]  Calvin Douglas Smith,et al.  Design‐focused evaluation , 2008 .

[19]  Unintegrated training? Exploring links between off- and on-the-job learning , 2002 .

[20]  Lee Harvey,et al.  Embedding and integrating employability , 2005 .

[21]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[22]  L. Hunt.  Authentic Learning at Work , 2006 .

[23]  Sue Dockett,et al.  Australian association for research in education , 1989 .

[24]  Manuel Crespo,et al.  Intensification of university–industry relationships and its impact on academic research , 2007 .

[25]  Chris Hughes,et al.  Practicum Learning: perils of the authentic workplace , 1998 .

[26]  D. T. Moore.  Curriculum at work: An educational perspective on the workplace as a learning environment , 2004 .

[27]  R. Foskett.  Collaborative Partnership in the higher education curriculum: a cross-sector study of foundation degree development , 2005 .

[28]  Stewart T. Fleming,et al.  Talking Past Each Other-Student and Staff Reflection in Undergraduate Software Projects , 2005 .

[29]  Joan Ballantine,et al.  Cooperative Learning: A Pedagogy to Improve Students' Generic Skills?. , 2007 .

[30]  D. Radcliffe,et al.  Fostering professional development through integrating work and formal learning , 2003, 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003..

[31]  P. Ramsden.  A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire , 1991 .

[32]  William B. Borgers.  DEMOCRACY AND EDUCATION. , 1919 .

[33]  Xiheng Hu,et al.  Evaluation of engineering work experience programs (I): Principles , 2009 .

[34]  Mats Daniels,et al.  Open Ended Group Projects a 'Tool' for More Effective Teaching , 2003, ACE.

[35]  Janice Orrell,et al.  Work-integrated Learning Programmes: Management and Educational Quality , 2004 .

[36]  Greg Ryan,et al.  The purpose, value and structure of the practicum in higher education: a literature review , 1996 .

[37]  Gary D. Lock,et al.  Work placement experience: should I stay or should I go? , 2009 .

[38]  Debra Mary Bath,et al.  The Role of the Learning Community in the Development of Discipline Knowledge and Generic Graduate Outcomes , 2006 .

[39]  Adnan Boyacı.  Authentic Learning Environments in Higher Education , 2006 .

[40]  Hamish Coates,et al.  Development of the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) , 2001 .

[41]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[42]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[43]  E. Wenger,et al.  Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[44]  Heather Short.  A critical evaluation of the contribution of trust to effective Technology Enhanced Learning in the workplace: A literature review , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[45]  A. Biglan.  The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. , 1973 .

[46]  Indra Abeysekera,et al.  Issues Relating to Designing a Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) Program in an Undergraduate Accounting Degree Program and Its Implications for the Curriculum , 2005 .

[47]  Gareth Parry,et al.  Conceptualising Curriculum Change , 2001 .

[48]  Precision Consultancy.  Graduate employability skills , 2007 .

[49]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[50]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[51]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[52]  Annegret Goold,et al.  Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology Students' Pedagogical Preferences in the Delivery of It Capstone Courses , 2022 .

[53]  Sarah J. Stein,et al.  Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum , 2004 .

[54]  P H Abelson,et al.  Engineering education. , 1985, Science.

[55]  David Boud,et al.  Experience and Learning: Reflection at Work. EAE600 Adults Learning in the Workplace: Part A. , 1991 .

[56]  Mantz Yorke.  Employability in higher education: what it is, what it is not , 2006 .

[57]  José Muñiz,et al.  Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Reliability and Validity of Rating Scales , 2008 .

[58]  Carol-joy Patrick.  The WIL (Work Integrated Learning) report: a national scoping study , 2008 .

[59]  P. Williams,et al.  A quantitative approach to assessment of work‐based learning outcomes: an urban planning application , 2007 .

[60]  C. Eames.  Learning To Work: Becoming a Research Scientist through Work Experience Placements. , 2001 .

[61]  Sandra Kerka,et al.  Work-based Learning: A New Higher Education? , 2002 .

[62]  M. Bates,et al.  Ivory Tower to Concrete Jungle revisited , 2004 .