Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement.

PURPOSE To endorse the American Urological Association (AUA)/American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) guideline on adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing clinical practice guidelines developed by other professional organizations. METHODS The guideline on adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. An ASCO endorsement panel then reviewed the content and recommendations. RESULTS The panel determined that the guideline recommendations on adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy, published in August 2013, are clear, thorough, and based on the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO endorsed the guideline on adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy, adding one qualifying statement that not all candidates for adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy have the same risk of recurrence or disease progression, and thus, risk-benefit ratios are not the same for all men. Those at the highest risk for recurrence after radical prostatectomy include men with seminal vesicle invasion, Gleason score 8 to 10, extensive positive margins, and detectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA). RECOMMENDATIONS Physicians should discuss adjuvant radiotherapy with patients with adverse pathologic findings at prostatectomy (ie, seminal vesicle invasion, positive surgical margins, extraprostatic extension) and salvage radiotherapy with patients with PSA or local recurrence after prostatectomy. The discussion of radiotherapy should include possible short- and long-term adverse effects and potential benefits. The decision to administer radiotherapy should be made by the patient and multidisciplinary treatment team, keeping in mind that not all men are at equal risk of recurrence or clinically meaningful disease progression. Thus, the risk-benefit ratio will differ for each patient.

[1]  S. Goldenberg,et al.  Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: AUA/ASTRO Guideline. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[2]  U. Capitanio,et al.  Selecting the optimal candidate for adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a long-term survival analysis. , 2013, European urology.

[3]  M. Terris,et al.  Postoperative prostate‐specific antigen nadir improves accuracy for predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) and Duke Prostate Center databases , 2010, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[4]  M. Terris,et al.  Natural history of persistently elevated prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[5]  Misop Han,et al.  Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2008, JAMA.

[6]  Alan W Partin,et al.  Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2005, JAMA.

[7]  E. B. Butler,et al.  Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. , 2004, JAMA.

[8]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2014 , 2014, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[9]  K. Gelmon AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST , 2013 .

[10]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Prostate Specific Antigen Doubling Time , 2008 .

[11]  Josef Korinek,et al.  Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology , 1982 .