Using time domain and geographic source tracers to conceptualize streamflow generation processes in lumped rainfall‐runoff models

[1] The temporal dynamics and geographical sources of streamflow were conceptualized in a lumped rainfall-runoff model (isoSAMdyn) using isotopic and geochemical tracers derived from a field study in a 3.6 km2 upland catchment in Scotland. High-resolution (daily) sampling of stable isotopes in precipitation and streamflow over a hydrological year, supplemented by fortnightly sampling of groundwater and riparian saturation zones, allowed hypotheses of runoff generation processes to be tested. These were conceptualized in a previously developed model (SAMdyn) based only on geochemically defined geographic source tracers, which showed that the nonlinear dynamic expansion and contraction of riparian saturation areas is the dominant mechanism for storm runoff generation in the catchment. While SAMdyn resulted in reasonable simulation of streamflows and alkalinity (as a source tracer), it was unable to reproduce the rainfall-runoff dynamics of deuterium (δ2H). Using the model in a learning framework, incorporation of parameters for passive storage in catchment hillslopes and groundwater mixing in riparian saturation zones, along with associated isotopic fractionation, improved δ2H simulations in stream water and the major catchment water stores. The resulting model provided a conceptualization of rainfall-runoff processes that broadly reconciled hydrometric data and geochemical and isotopic signals. However, in this particular catchment, fractionation of water in surface saturation zones appears to be a complex process that prevents the simulation of short-term isotope dynamics in the stream during the summer period.

[1]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Inter‐catchment comparison to assess the influence of topography and soils on catchment transit times in a geomorphic province; the Cairngorm mountains, Scotland , 2009 .

[2]  C. Neal,et al.  Hydrochemical heterogeneity in an upland catchment: further characterisation of the spatial, temporal and depth variations in soils, streams and groundwaters of the Plynlimon forested catchment, Wales , 2005 .

[3]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  Learning from model improvement: On the contribution of complementary data to process understanding , 2008 .

[4]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Scaling up and out in runoff process understanding: insights from nested experimental catchment studies , 2006 .

[5]  E. Barkan,et al.  Fractionation of oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in evaporating water , 2009 .

[6]  Sarah M. Dunn,et al.  Parameter identification for conceptual modelling using combined behavioural knowledge , 2003 .

[7]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Conceptualizing catchment processes: simply too complex? , 2008 .

[8]  P. Bacon,et al.  Inferring groundwater influences on surface water in montane catchments from hydrochemical surveys of springs and streamwaters , 2007 .

[9]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Do Nash values have value? , 2007 .

[10]  L. Wassenaar,et al.  High-precision laser spectroscopy D/H and 18O/16O measurements of microliter natural water samples. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  J. Kirchner,et al.  Fractal stream chemistry and its implications for contaminant transport in catchments , 2000, Nature.

[12]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Integrating tracer experiments with modeling to assess runoff processes and water transit times , 2007 .

[13]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Hydrograph Separation Using Continuous Open System Isotope Mixing , 1995 .

[14]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Incorporating multiple observations for distributed hydrologic model calibration : An approach using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and clustering , 2008 .

[15]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Conceptualization of runoff processes using a geographical information system and tracers in a nested mesoscale catchment , 2007 .

[16]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  High‐frequency field‐deployable isotope analyzer for hydrological applications , 2009 .

[17]  J. Kirchner.  A double paradox in catchment hydrology and geochemistry , 2003 .

[18]  Kevin Bishop,et al.  Simulating interactions between saturated and unsaturated storage in a conceptual runoff model , 2003 .

[19]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems , 1981 .

[20]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Does the incorporation of process conceptualization and tracer data improve the structure and performance of a simple rainfall‐runoff model in a Scottish mesoscale catchment? , 2008 .

[21]  Alan Jenkins,et al.  Isotope hydrology of the Allt a' Mharcaidh catchment, Cairngorms, Scotland : implications for hydrological pathways and residence times , 2000 .

[22]  L. Cooper.  Isotopic Fractionation in Snow Cover , 1998 .

[23]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Assessing the value of high‐resolution isotope tracer data in the stepwise development of a lumped conceptual rainfall–runoff model , 2010 .

[24]  Kellie B. Vaché,et al.  A process‐based rejectionist framework for evaluating catchment runoff model structure , 2006 .

[25]  James W. Kirchner,et al.  The fine structure of water‐quality dynamics: the (high‐frequency) wave of the future , 2004 .

[26]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Subsurface flow paths in a steep, unchanneled catchment , 1997 .

[27]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Applying the scientific method to small catchment studies: a review of the Panola Mountain experience , 2001 .

[28]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Transit time distributions of a conceptual model: their characteristics and sensitivities , 2010 .

[29]  M. Katsuyama,et al.  Elucidation of the relationship between geographic and time sources of stream water using a tracer approach in a headwater catchment , 2009 .

[30]  Keith Beven,et al.  Towards integrated environmental models of everywhere: uncertainty, data and modelling as a learning process , 2007 .

[31]  M. Bonell,et al.  APPLICATION OF UNIT HYDROGRAPH TECHNIQUES TO SOLUTE TRANSPORT IN CATCHMENTS , 1996 .

[32]  J. Kirchner.  Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology , 2006 .

[33]  W. Bowden,et al.  Hillslope and wetland hydrodynamics in a tussock grassland, South Island, New Zealand , 2001 .

[34]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Regionalization of transit time estimates in montane catchments by integrating landscape controls , 2009 .

[35]  J. R. O'neil,et al.  HYDROGEN AND OXYGEN ISOTOPE FRACTIONATION BETWEEN ICE AND WATER. , 1968 .

[36]  G. Lischeid.  Combining Hydrometric and Hydrochemical Data Sets for Investigating Runoff Generation Processes: Tautologies, Inconsistencies and Possible Explanations , 2008 .

[37]  C. Gibbins,et al.  Variability in stream discharge and temperature: a preliminary assessment of the implications for juvenile and spawning Atlantic salmon , 2005 .

[38]  Christopher Spence,et al.  On the relation between dynamic storage and runoff: A discussion on thresholds, efficiency, and function , 2007 .

[39]  Chris Soulsby,et al.  High‐frequency logging technologies reveal state‐dependent hyporheic process dynamics: implications for hydroecological studies , 2006 .

[40]  L. Araguás‐Araguás,et al.  Deuterium and oxygen‐18 isotope composition of precipitation and atmospheric moisture , 2000 .

[41]  C. Neal,et al.  Acid neutralization capacity measurements in surface and ground waters in the Upper River Severn, Plynlimon: from hydrograph splitting to water flow pathways , 1997 .

[42]  Robert E. Criss,et al.  Do Nash values have value? Discussion and alternate proposals , 2008 .

[43]  Rae Mackay,et al.  Spatial variation in evapotranspiration and the influence of land use on catchment hydrology , 1995 .

[44]  A. Pearce,et al.  Storm runoff generation in humid headwater catchments 1 , 1986 .

[45]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  On the calibration of hydrological models in ungauged basins: A framework for integrating hard and soft hydrological information , 2009 .

[46]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology , 2007 .

[47]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Quantifying the relative contributions of riparian and hillslope zones to catchment runoff , 2003 .

[48]  Ch. Leibundgut,et al.  Process‐oriented catchment modelling and multiple‐response validation , 2002 .

[49]  J. Stedinger,et al.  Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method , 2008 .

[50]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Catchment data for process conceptualization: simply not enough? , 2008 .

[51]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  How does landscape structure influence catchment transit time across different geomorphic provinces? , 2009 .

[52]  P. Troch,et al.  A tale of two isotopes: differences in hydrograph separation for a runoff event when using δD versus δ18O , 2009 .

[53]  R. Reid,et al.  Stable isotope fingerprint of open-water evaporation losses and effective drainage area fluctuations in a subarctic shield watershed , 2010 .

[54]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  Isotope hydrological study of mean transit times in an alpine basin (Wimbachtal, Germany) , 1992 .

[55]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Conceptualization in catchment modelling: simply learning? , 2008 .

[56]  D. Hannah,et al.  Groundwater–surface water interactions in upland Scottish rivers: hydrological, hydrochemical and ecological implications , 2005, Scottish Journal of Geology.

[57]  J. Gibson,et al.  Regional water balance trends and evaporation‐transpiration partitioning from a stable isotope survey of lakes in northern Canada , 2002 .

[58]  M. Hrachowitz,et al.  Tracers and transit times: windows for viewing catchment scale storage? , 2009 .

[59]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Connectivity between landscapes and riverscapes—a unifying theme in integrating hydrology and ecology in catchment science? , 2007 .

[60]  R. Harriman,et al.  Hydrogeochemistry of shallow groundwater in an upland Scottish catchment , 1998 .

[61]  R. Cichota,et al.  An Alternative Approach for the Determination of Soil Water Mobility , 2008 .

[62]  Ronald B. Smith,et al.  Measurement of deuterium isotope flux ratio from an agricultural grassland , 2003 .

[63]  J. Kirchner.  Catchments as simple dynamical systems: Catchment characterization, rainfall‐runoff modeling, and doing hydrology backward , 2009 .

[64]  J. Jouzel,et al.  Deuterium and oxygen 18 in precipitation: Modeling of the isotopic effects during snow formation , 1984 .

[65]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Towards a simple dynamic process conceptualization in rainfall–runoff models using multi-criteria calibration and tracers in temperate, upland catchments , 2009 .

[66]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Assessing the impact of mixing assumptions on the estimation of streamwater mean residence time , 2010 .

[67]  Xiahong Feng,et al.  Isotopic Exchange Rate Constant between Snow and Liquid Water , 2009 .

[68]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  A multisignal automatic calibration methodology for hydrochemical models: A case study of the Birkenes Model , 1988 .

[69]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration , 2002 .

[70]  H. Laudon,et al.  Linking soil- and stream-water chemistry based on a Riparian Flow-Concentration Integration Model , 2009 .

[71]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .