Extension of the Thermographic Signal Reconstruction Technique for an Automated Segmentation and Depth Estimation of Subsurface Defects

With increased use of light-weight materials with low factors of safety, non-destructive testing becomes increasingly important. Thanks to the advancement of infrared camera technology, pulse thermography is a cost efficient way to detect subsurface defects non-destructively. However, currently available evaluation algorithms have either a high computational cost or show poor performance if any geometry other than the most simple kind is surveyed. We present an extension of the thermographic signal reconstruction technique which can automatically segment and image defects from sound areas, while also estimating the defect depth, all with low computational cost. We verified our algorithm using real world measurements and compare our results to standard active thermography algorithms with similar computational complexity. We found that our algorithm can detect defects more accurately, especially when more complex geometries are examined.

[1]  Francesco Ciampa,et al.  Recent Advances in Active Infrared Thermography for Non-Destructive Testing of Aerospace Components , 2018, Sensors.

[2]  P. Burgholzer,et al.  Photoacoustic reconstruction from photothermal measurements including prior information , 2020, Photoacoustics.

[3]  Peter Burgholzer,et al.  Three-dimensional thermographic imaging using a virtual wave concept , 2017 .

[4]  Agustín Salazar,et al.  Energy propagation of thermal waves , 2006 .

[5]  Steven M. Shepard,et al.  Advances in thermographic signal reconstruction , 2015, Commercial + Scientific Sensing and Imaging.

[6]  S. Marinetti,et al.  Pulse phase infrared thermography , 1996 .

[7]  Daniel L. Balageas,et al.  In Search of Early Time: An Original Approach in the Thermographic Identification of Thermophysical Properties and Defects , 2013 .

[8]  Zijun Wang,et al.  Comparative analysis of eddy current pulsed thermography and long pulse thermography for damage detection in metals and composites , 2019, NDT & E International.

[9]  Wei-Min Liu,et al.  THE THERMOGRAPHIC SIGNAL RECONSTRUCTION METHOD: A POWERFUL TOOL FOR THE ENHANCEMENT OF TRANSIENT THERMOGRAPHIC IMAGES. , 2015, Biocybernetics and biomedical engineering.

[10]  Nik Rajic,et al.  Principal component thermography for flaw contrast enhancement and flaw depth characterisation in composite structures , 2002 .

[11]  Mathias Ziegler,et al.  Photothermal image reconstruction in opaque media with virtual wave backpropagation , 2020 .

[12]  V. P. Vavilov,et al.  Review of pulsed thermal NDT: Physical principles, theory and data processing , 2015 .

[13]  Blind structured illumination as excitation for super-resolution photothermal radiometry , 2020, Quantitative InfraRed Thermography Journal.

[14]  Z. Zeng,et al.  Absolute peak slope time based thickness measurement using pulsed thermography , 2012 .

[15]  C. Ibarra-Castanedo,et al.  Review of pulsed phase thermography , 2015, Commercial + Scientific Sensing and Imaging.

[16]  Zijun Wang,et al.  Image processing based quantitative damage evaluation in composites with long pulse thermography , 2018, NDT & E International.

[17]  Xavier Maldague,et al.  Advances in pulsed phase thermography , 2002 .

[18]  Vladimir P. Vavilov,et al.  Dynamic thermal tomography: Recent improvements and applications , 2015 .

[19]  Darryl P Almond,et al.  An analytical study of the pulsed thermography defect detection limit , 2012 .