On the limits of top-down control of visual selection

[1]  G. Campana,et al.  Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Detecting the presence of a singleton involves focal attention , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Hsin-I Liao,et al.  On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[5]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Visual search for featural singletons: No top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming , 2006 .

[6]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The role of cueing in attentional capture , 2008 .

[8]  Bradley S. Gibson,et al.  The identity intrusion effect: Attentional capture or perceptual load? , 2008 .

[9]  S. Luck,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Monkey Neurophysiology and Human Perception: An Ambiguity Resolution Theory of Visual Selective Attention , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[13]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  E. Van der Burg,et al.  The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  H. Müller,et al.  Distinct, but top-down modulable color and positional priming mechanisms in visual pop-out search , 2009, Psychological research.

[16]  H. Müller,et al.  Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective? , 2006 .

[17]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Priming in Macaque Frontal Cortex during Popout Visual Search: Feature-Based Facilitation and Location-Based Inhibition of Return , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[19]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain , 2009, Vision Research.

[21]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[22]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual Selectivity for Color and Form: On the Nature of the Interference Effect , 1996 .

[23]  J. Theeuwes.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: Additivity is no evidence for filtering , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[25]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate , 2022 .

[26]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection: Reply to commentaries , 2010 .

[27]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  SEARCH FOR A CONJUNCTIVELY DEFINED TARGET CAN BE SELECTIVELY LIMITED TO A COLOR-DEFINED SUBSET OF ELEMENTS , 1995 .

[28]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  A visual salience map in the primate frontal eye field. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[29]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  What is top-down about contingent capture? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[33]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Clayton Hickey,et al.  Priming resolves perceptual ambiguity in visual search: Evidence from behaviour and electrophysiology , 2010, Vision Research.

[35]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  R. Remington,et al.  Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[37]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  The role of priming in conjunctive visual search , 2002, Cognition.