An in vitro Comparison between Two Methods of Electrical Resistance Measurement for Occlusal Caries Detection

Because of different measurement techniques and the easier design of the CRM prototype, this in vitro study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance and reproducibility of two electrical methods (Electronic Caries Monitor III, ECM and Cariometer 800, CRM) for occlusal caries detection, and to evaluate the effect of staining/discoloration of fissures on diagnostic performance. Hundred and seventeen third molars with no apparent occlusal cavitation were selected. Six examiners inspected all specimens independently, using the CRM, and a subgroup of 4 using the ECM. Histological validation using a stereomicroscope was performed after hemisectioning. Intra- and interexaminer reproducibility was assessed by Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland and Altman analysis. Diagnostic performance parameters included sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP) and area under the ROC curve (Az). The CCC yielded an intra- and interexaminer reproducibility of 0.69/0.62 (ECM) and of 0.79/0.74 (CRM). The mean intra- and interexaminer 95% range of measurements (range between Bland and Altman limits of agreement) given in percentages of the instrument reading were 67%/65% for the ECM and 28%/33% for the CRM. Az at the D3–4 level was 0.74 (ECM) and 0.78 (CRM). The CRM showed at least equivalent diagnostic performance to the ECM. However, improvement is still desirable. Diagnostic performance appeared to be enhanced in discolored lesions; however, this may be related to sample lesion distribution characteristics.

[1]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[2]  G. Truin,et al.  Performance of electrical resistance measurements adjunct to visual inspection in the early diagnosis of occlusal caries. , 1993, Journal of dentistry.

[3]  Xie-Qi Shi,et al.  Occlusal caries detection and quantification by DIAGNOdent and Electronic Caries Monitor: in vitro comparison , 2002, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[4]  A Lussi,et al.  In vivo diagnosis of fissure caries using a new electrical resistance monitor. , 1995, Caries research.

[5]  R. Ellwood,et al.  An in vitro Comparison of a Combined FOTI/Visual Examination of Occlusal Caries with Other Caries Diagnostic Methods and the Effect of Stain on Their Diagnostic Performance , 2003, Caries Research.

[6]  Christopher Longbottom,et al.  Detection of dental decay and its extent using a.c. impedence spectroscopy , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[7]  E. Kidd,et al.  The effect of airflow on site-specific electrical conductance measurements used in the diagnosis of pit and fissure caries in vitro. , 1997, Caries research.

[8]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[9]  P J Liepins,et al.  Histological validation of electrical resistance measurements in the diagnosis of occlusal caries. , 1996, Caries research.

[10]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Diagnostic Outcome of Methods Frequently Used for Caries Validation , 2003, Caries Research.

[11]  Electronic diagnosis of occlusal caries in vitro: adaptation of the technique for epidemiological purposes. , 1997, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[12]  N. Pitts,et al.  Electrical Methods in Occlusal Caries Diagnosis: An in vitro Comparison with Visual Inspection and Bite–Wing Radiography , 1998, Caries Research.

[13]  M. Huysmans,et al.  Caries Detection Methods: Can They Aid Decision Making for Invasive Sealant Treatment? , 2001, Caries Research.

[14]  A Wenzel,et al.  Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs. , 1991, Caries research.

[15]  E. Kidd,et al.  Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination. , 1997, Caries research.

[16]  A Wenzel,et al.  Assessment of diagnostic accuracy in caries detection: an analysis of two methods. , 1993, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[17]  C. Longbottom,et al.  Surface–Specific Electrical Occlusal Caries Diagnosis: Reproducibility, Correlation with Histological Lesion Depth, and Tooth Type Dependence , 1998, Caries Research.

[18]  J J ten Bosch,et al.  Dynamics of and diagnostic methods for detecting small carious lesions. , 1996, Caries research.

[19]  N B Pitts,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of dental caries: a European perspective. , 2001, Journal of dental education.