Concubinage or Marriage? Informal and Formal Cooperations for Innovation

Based on a sample of German innovating firms that contains information on formal and informal innovation cooperation between customers and suppliers, we state that firms perceive informal cooperation as being more important than formal cooperation modes. We then investigate the determinants of firms? decisions to engage into the respective cooperation modes. In line with previous empirical work, we do not find much empirical evidence for the relevance of incoming spillovers. In addition, our results suggest that this finding holds as well for informal cooper- ations. A firm?s ability to protect its proprietary innovations, however seems to be a key determinant of formal as well as informal cooperations. Furthermor absorptive capacity and the organizational structur of in-house R&D play an important role. Another relevant driver of vertical cooperations are the innovation dynamics at the industry level. Firms who operate an R&D department and firms who are involved in costly R&D projects tend to cooperate formally rather than informally.

[1]  J. Nickerson,et al.  Empirical evidence regarding the tension between knowledge sharing and knowledge expropriation in collaborations , 2004 .

[2]  Nejat Anbarcı,et al.  Inter-firm complementarities in R&D: a re-examination of the relative performance of joint ventures , 2002 .

[3]  Bruno Cassiman,et al.  Endogeneizing Know-How Flows Through the Nature of R&D Investments , 2000 .

[4]  Raymond De Bondt,et al.  Spillovers and innovative activities , 1997 .

[5]  David C. Mowery,et al.  SEMATECH and collaborative research: Lessons in the design of high‐technology consortia , 1994 .

[6]  P. Geroski.  Vertical Relations between Firms and Industrial Policy , 1992 .

[7]  Israel Zang,et al.  Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacity , 2000 .

[8]  Ping Lin,et al.  Vertical research joint ventures , 2001 .

[9]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Endogenizing Know-How Flows Through the Nature of R&D Investments , 2000 .

[10]  Massimo G. Colombo,et al.  Technological cooperative agreements and firm's R & D intensity. A note on causality relations , 1996 .

[11]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[12]  E. Muller,et al.  Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels , 1992 .

[13]  A. Drejer.  Innovation and learning , 2003 .

[14]  David F. Midgley,et al.  The effect of network structure in industrial diffusion processes , 1992 .

[15]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Who cooperates on R&D? , 2001 .

[16]  Geert Steurs.  Inter-industry R&D spillovers: What difference do they make? , 1995 .

[17]  Fr¬¥ed¬¥erique Sachwald,et al.  Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis , 2003 .

[18]  Mark R. Frascatore,et al.  Public Policy And R&D When Research Joint Ventures Are Costly , 2000 .

[19]  Hans Gersbach,et al.  Endogenous spillovers and incentives to innovate , 1999 .

[20]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[21]  R&D spillovers and information exchange , 1998 .

[22]  Z. Griliches.  The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[23]  Julian Lowe,et al.  Protecting Strategic Knowledge: Insights from Collaborative Agreements in the Aerospace Sector , 2004, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[24]  Richard N. Osborn,et al.  Protecting intellectual capital in international alliances , 1997 .

[25]  Henrik Sattler,et al.  Informal cooperation in the US and Germany: cooperative managerial capitalism vs. competitive managerial capitalism in interfirm information trading , 2003 .

[26]  Gamal Atallah,et al.  Vertical R&D Spillovers, Cooperation, Market Structure, and Innovation , 2002 .

[27]  R. Amir.  Modelling Imperfectly Appropriable R&D via Spillovers , 2000 .

[28]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Strategic spillovers and incentives for research and development , 1996 .

[29]  Ulrich Kaiser.  An empirical test of models explaining research expenditures and research cooperation: evidence for the German service sector , 2002 .

[30]  Patricia M. Norman.  Are your secrets safe? Knowledge protection in strategic alliances , 2001 .

[31]  Roland Helm,et al.  Controlling contractual exchange risks in R&D interfirm cooperation: an empirical study , 2004 .

[32]  Najib Harabi,et al.  Innovation Through Vertical Relations Between Firms, Suppliers And Customers: A Study Of German Firms , 1998 .

[33]  R. Veugelers,et al.  Stable R&D Cooperation with Spillovers , 1995 .

[34]  A. Jacquemin,et al.  Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers , 1988 .

[35]  B. Tether.  Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis , 2002 .

[36]  K. Clark,et al.  Creating project plans to focus product development. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[37]  R. Hernan,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the Determinants of Research Joint Venture Formation , 2003 .

[38]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[39]  D. McFadden,et al.  Specification tests for the multinomial logit model , 1984 .

[40]  Beverly B. Tyler,et al.  Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities: A cognitive modeling perspective , 1995 .

[41]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Formal and Informal Cooperation Strategies in International Industrial Networks , 1988 .

[42]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[43]  E. Hippel.  Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading , 1987 .

[44]  C. Hsiao,et al.  Multinomial Logit Specification Tests , 1985 .

[45]  Najib Harabi,et al.  The Impact of Vertical R&D Cooperation on Firm Innovation: An Empirical Investigation , 2002 .

[46]  Melissa M. Appleyard,et al.  HOW DOES KNOWLEDGE FLOW? INTERFIRM PATTERNS IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY , 1996 .

[47]  Jose A.B. Assis.  External linkages and technological innovation: (some) topical issues , 2003 .

[48]  John W. Clarr.  Cooperative Strategies in International Business , 1990 .