AIMS
Ultrafast detector technology enables bolus-triggered application of contrast media. In a prospective study we investigated the benefit of this new method with the intention of optimizing enhancement during examination of the chest and abdomen.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In total, we examined 548 patients under standardized conditions. All examinations were performed on a Somatom Plus 4 Power CT system (Siemens Corp., Forchheim, Germany) using the CARE-Bolus software. This produces repetitive low-dose test images (e.g. for the lung: 140 kV, 43 mA, TI 0.5 s) and measures the Hounsfield attenuation in a pre-selected region of interest. After exceeding a defined threshold, a diagnostic spiral CT examination was begun automatically. The data obtained from 321 abdominal CT and 179 lung CT examinations were correlated with different parameters such as age, weight and height of the patients and parameters of vascular access. In a group of 80 patients, the injection of contrast medium was stopped after reaching a pre-defined threshold of an increase of 100 HU over the baseline. Then, we assessed the maximal enhancement of liver, pulmonal artery trunk and aortic arch.
RESULTS
There was no correlation between bolus geometry and age, body surface or weight. In helical CT of the abdomen the threshold was reached after a mean trigger time of 27 s (range 13-67 s) and only 65 ml (range 41-105 ml) of contrast medium were administered. In helical CT of the lung the threshold was reached after 21 s (range 12-48 s) and the mean amount of administered contrast medium was 48 ml (range 38-71 ml).
CONCLUSION
Bolus triggering allows optimized enhancement of the organs and reduces the dose of contrast material required compared with standard administration.
[1]
E Grabbe,et al.
Parenchymal liver enhancement with bolus-triggered helical CT: preliminary clinical results.
,
1995,
Radiology.
[2]
P M Silverman,et al.
Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast material.
,
1996,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[3]
S. Kusano,et al.
Prediction of the time to peak hepatic enhancement to optimize contrast-enhanced spiral CT.
,
1995,
Acta radiologica.
[4]
C. Claussen,et al.
Bolusgeometrie und -dynamik nach intravenöser Kontrastmittelinjektion
,
1982
.
[5]
S S Sagel,et al.
Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
,
1993,
Radiology.
[6]
C. E. Kahn,et al.
Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol.
,
1994,
Radiology.
[7]
H. Dinkel,et al.
Optimizing liver contrast in helical liver CT: value of a real-time bolus-triggering technique
,
1998,
European Radiology.
[8]
P M Silverman,et al.
Optimal contrast enhancement of the liver using helical (spiral) CT: value of SmartPrep.
,
1995,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.