Should students participate in curriculum design? Discussionarising from a first year curriculum design project and aliterature review

This paper outlines some of the findings from a QAA (Scotland) funded project exploring first year curriculum design (Bovill et al. 2008). Whilst many examples exist of curricula being designed in ways to engage first year students, there are fewer published examples of active student participation in curriculum design processes. In the current higher education context where student engagement in learning is emphasised (Carini et al, 2006), this paper asks more generally whether students should be actively participating in curriculum design. In order to answer this question, several elements of the project findings are explored: student views gathered in focus groups; staff views collected in workshops; and the case studies where students were actively involved in curriculum design. The data are examined for lessons that inform the debate about whether students should be participating in curriculum design, in first year and at other levels. Alongside these findings, relevant literature is critiqued in order to ascertain the desirability and feasibility of adopting curriculum design approaches that offer opportunities for active student participation.

[1]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[2]  Bill Cooke,et al.  The case for participation as tyranny , 2001 .

[3]  K Morss,et al.  Curriculum design for the first year: Quality Enhancement Theme: The First Year Experience , 2008 .

[4]  J. Dewey Democracy and education : an introduction to the philosophy of education , 1961 .

[5]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages* , 2006 .

[6]  Michael P. Breen,et al.  Classroom Decision-Making: Negotiation and Process Syllabuses in Practice , 2000 .

[7]  B. Hooks Teaching to transgress : education as the practice of freedom , 1994 .

[8]  J. Mezirow Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 2000 .

[9]  Henry A. Giroux,et al.  Curriculum & Instruction Alternatives in Education , 1981 .

[10]  Gwatkin Dr,et al.  Health inequalities and the health of the poor: What do we know? What can we do? , 2000 .

[11]  Barry Kanpol Critical Pedagogy: An Introduction , 1994 .

[12]  Deem Rosemary,et al.  Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education , 2005 .

[13]  D. Gwatkin Health inequalities and the health of the poor: what do we know? What can we do? , 2000, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[14]  L. Bartolomé Beyond the Methods Fetish: Toward a Humanizing Pedagogy , 1994 .

[15]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[16]  Paulo Freire,et al.  Pedagogy of the Oppressed , 2019, Toward a Just World Order.

[17]  Sharon Fraser,et al.  The curriculum? That’s just a unit outline, isn’t it? , 2006 .

[18]  Ira Shor Empowering Education: Critical Teaching for Social Change , 1992 .

[19]  Ronald Barnett,et al.  Higher Education: A Critical Business , 1997 .

[20]  J. Barr,et al.  For a radical higher education after postmodernism , 2002 .

[21]  William F. Pinar The Reconceptualisation of Curriculum Studies , 1978 .

[22]  Tamsin Haggis Pedagogies for diversity: retaining critical challenge amidst fears of ‘dumbing down’ , 2006 .

[23]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[24]  L. Paré Popular Education: Engaging the Academy. International Perspectives , 2006 .