Open and free deliberation: A prerequisite for positive design

Success in designing organizations and management with a positive lens will require multiple forms of positive inquiry. We introduce the model of Deliberative Inquiry based on Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action as a way to create an additional form of positive inquiry. We argue that Deliberative Inquiry and Appreciative Inquiry naturally complement and support each other in providing a suitable approach to positive design. Whereas the flagship contribution of Appreciative Inquiry is a breakaway from deficit-oriented thinking and a focus on life-generating forces, Deliberative Inquiry's hallmark is the elimination of artificially imposed constraints through rational discourse. Appreciative Inquiry seeks strengths from positive emotions, while Deliberative Inquiry employs positive critique to unmask barriers to change and arrive at morally, ethically and pragmatically sound decisions by mutual and authentic agreement. We conclude by raising some guiding questions for the possibility of providing computer support for such inquiring systems.

[1]  J. Bohman.  Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy , 1996 .

[2]  Stephen K. White,et al.  Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy@@@The Cambridge Companion to Habermas , 1997 .

[3]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[4]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Design With a Positive Lens: An Affirmative Approach to Designing Information and Organizations , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Decision Support and paradigms of Decision Making , 2005 .

[6]  C. Elliot.  Locating the Energy for Change: An Introduction to Appreciative Inquiry , 1999 .

[7]  G. R. Bushe.  Advances in Appreciative Inquiry as an Organization Development Intervention , 1999 .

[8]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[9]  David L. Cooperrider,et al.  Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change , 2005 .

[10]  C. Churchman,et al.  The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization , 1971 .

[11]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Information Technology in Support of Public Deliberation , 2005 .

[12]  Tamara Witschge,et al.  Online deliberation : Possibilities of the Internet for deliberative democracy , 2004 .

[13]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[14]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Managing as Designing , 2004 .

[15]  David L. Cooperrider.  Positive Image, Positive Action: The Affirmative Basis of Organizing , 1999 .

[16]  Minh Q. Huynh,et al.  The critical social theory of Jürgen Habermas and its implications for IS research , 2004 .

[17]  David L. Cooperrider.  Appreciative inquiry : an emerging direction for organization development , 2001 .

[18]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  J. Cappella,et al.  Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? , 2002 .

[20]  Jean-Jacques Rousseau,et al.  The Social Contract and The Discourses , 2016 .

[21]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society , 1989 .

[22]  Stephen K. White.  The Cambridge companion to Habermas , 1995 .

[23]  J. Dryzek.  Deliberative Democracy And Beyond , 2000 .

[24]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  From Kant to Hegel: On Robert Brandom's Pragmatic Philosophy of Language , 2000 .

[25]  Philip Pettit,et al.  The good polity : normative analysis of the state , 1991 .

[26]  Billy V. Koen,et al.  Definition of the engineering method , 1985 .

[27]  Dennis F. Thompson,et al.  Democracy and Disagreement , 1996 .

[28]  David L. Cooperrider,et al.  INTRODUCTION: ADVANCES IN APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY – CONSTRUCTIVE DISCOURSE AND HUMAN ORGANIZATION , 2004 .

[29]  Joshua Cohen,et al.  DELIBERATION AND DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY , 2005, Philosophy, Politics, Democracy.

[30]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy , 1995 .

[31]  Deirdre Curtin,et al.  Transparency and political participation in EU governance: A role for civil society? , 1999 .

[32]  Angi Voß,et al.  Zeno: Groupware for Discourses on the Internet , 2001, Künstliche Intell..

[33]  L. Roberts,et al.  Shifting the Lens on Organizational Life: The Added Value of Positive Scholarship , 2006 .

[34]  G. Warnke,et al.  Communicative rationality and cultural values , 1995 .

[35]  S. Fineman.  On Being Positive: Concerns and Counterpoints , 2006 .

[36]  Seyla Benhabib,et al.  Democracy and difference : contesting the boundaries of the political , 1996 .

[37]  Tony Lingham,et al.  Appreciative Inquiry and Public Dialogue: An Approach to Community Change , 2002 .

[38]  F. Barrett.  Creating appreciative learning cultures , 1995 .

[39]  Nikos I. Karacapilidis,et al.  The Zeno argumentation framework , 1997, ICAIL '97.

[40]  Donald J. Pierce,et al.  Democracy in America , 2018, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[41]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[42]  J. Austin.  How to do things with words , 1962 .

[43]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Redesigning Human Systems , 2003 .

[44]  Michael S. H. Heng,et al.  From Habermas's communicative theory to practice on the internet , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[45]  R. Inglehart.  Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies , 1997 .

[46]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Social theory and philosophy for information systems , 2004 .

[47]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Wisdom, decision support and paradigms of decision making , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[48]  W. Ernst Eder,et al.  Design Modeling-A Design Science Approach (and Why Does Industry Not Use It?) , 1998 .

[49]  Ray Oldenburg,et al.  The great good place : cafés, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day , 1991 .

[50]  James Gordon Finlayson,et al.  Habermas: A Very Short Introduction , 2005 .

[51]  J. Habermas.  Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research , 2006 .

[52]  Michael L. Begeman,et al.  gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion , 1988, CSCW '88.