Bringing ADDIE to Life: Instructional Design at Its Best.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Instructional design has numerous approaches and theories available for use by designers and instructors. One model was particularly effective in providing developers with a generic, systematic framework that was easy to use and applicable to a variety of settings. The ADDIE model (i.e., Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) was used in two ways in a Master's level instructional design course, first as a framework for the development of the course and later as a process for the creation of multimedia projects. The ADDIE model presented users with an approach to instructional design that incorporated an iterative process complete with essential steps for the development of an effective course or program. Employing the ADDIE model in the development of a program or course can assist developers in instituting a learner-centered approach rather than a teacher-centered approach, making the program more applicable and meaningful for learners. ********** JI. of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia (2003) 12(3), 227-241 The ADDIE instructional design process (i.e., Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) is a common approach widely used in the development of instructional courses and training programs (Figure 1). This approach provides educators with useful, clearly defined stages for the effective implementation of instruction. Consisting of five phases, the ADDIE framework was used in two ways in the development of an instructional design course for Master's level students. First, the ADDIE framework was used in the planning of the instructional design course. Subsequently, the framework proved useful as a scaffold for students developing multimedia projects as their culminating requirement for the course. Using the ADDIE model throughout the course placed an emphasis on the learner rather than a teacher-centered approach. The analysis of the learners became a crucial aspect in the design of the course and was an essential piece for the learners as they designed their individual multimedia projects. The ADDIE framework brought the instructional design course and projects to life by providing a process that actively engaged developers in problem solving (Figure 1). [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] THE ADDIE FRAMEWORK: FIVE PHASES The ADDIE framework is a cyclical process that evolves over time and continues throughout the instructional planning and implementation process. Five stages comprise the framework, each with its won distinct purpose and function in the progression of instructional design. Phase 1: Analysis In the analysis phase, the designers' main consideration is the target audience. First, a needs analysis is conducted to determine the needs of the audience by distinguishing between what students already know and what they need to know at the conclusion of the course. During the needs analysis, instructors or designers examine standards and competencies to establish a foundation when determining what students need by the completion of the course. Information may also be available from previous course evaluations if the course has already been taught. Subsequently, a task analysis is also necessary to identify the instructional content or the specific skills related to the job or course. The content of the course or program can be analyzed with the aid of course texts, sample syllabi, and course websites with a similar focus. With the advent of the Internet, many courses are easily accessible online and can provide a framework or workable template for instructors that are developing a course or teaching a course for the first time. Last, an instructional analysis is performed to establish what must be learned (Seels & Glasgow, 1998). The designer determines the amount of instruction that is needed in relation to the needs and task analysis. …
[1] David E. Tanner. Assessing Academic Achievement , 2000 .
[2] Tim H. Murphy. A Quantitative Analysis of Instructor-Student Verbal Interaction in a Two-Way Audio Two-Way Video Distance Education Setting. , 1999 .
[3] Jon J. Denton,et al. Instructional skills handbook , 1978 .
[4] Zita Glasgow,et al. Making Instructional Design Decisions , 1997 .