First to market is not everything: an analysis of preferential attachment with fitness

The design of algorithms on complex networks, such as routing, ranking or recommendation algorithms, requires a detailed understanding of the growth characteristics of the networks of interest, such as the Internet,the web graph, social networks or online communities. To this end, preferential attachment, in which the popularity (or relevance) of a node is determined by its degree, is a well-known and appealing random graph model, whose predictions are in accordance with experiments on the web graph and several social networks. However, its central assumption, that the popularity of the nodes dependsonly on their degree, is not a realistic one, since every node has potentially some intrinsic quality which can differentiate its attractiveness from other nodes with similar degrees. In this paper, we provide a rigorous analysis of preferential attachment with fitness, suggested by Bianconi and Barabási and studied by Motwani and Xu, in which the degree of a vertex is scaled by its quality to determine its attractiveness. Including quality considerations in the classical preferential attachment model provides a much more realistic description of many complex networks, such as the web graph, and allows toobserve a much richer behavior in the growth dynamics of these networks. Specifically, depending on the shape of the distributionfrom which the qualities of the vertices are drawn, we observe three distinct phases, namely a first-mover-advantage phase, afit-get-richer phase and an innovation-pays-offphase. We precisely characterize the properties of the quality distribution that result in each of these phases and we computethe exact growth dynamics for each phase. The dynamics provide rich information about the quality of the vertices, which can bevery useful in many practical contexts, including ranking algorithms for the web, recommendation algorithms, as well as thestudy of social networks.

[1]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[2]  Mihaela Enachescu,et al.  Variations on Random Graph Models for the Web , 2001 .

[3]  Andrei Z. Broder,et al.  Graph structure in the Web , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[4]  Prabhakar Raghavan The changing face of web search: algorithms, auctions and advertising , 2006, STOC '06.

[5]  H. Simon,et al.  ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS , 1955 .

[6]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  The degree sequence of a scale‐free random graph process , 2001, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[7]  Michael Mitzenmacher,et al.  A Brief History of Generative Models for Power Law and Lognormal Distributions , 2004, Internet Math..

[8]  N. Gilbert A Simulation of the Structure of Academic Science , 1997 .

[9]  Mikko Alava,et al.  Branching Processes , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[10]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .

[11]  A. Bonato RANDOM GRAPH MODELS FOR THE WEB GRAPH , 2007 .

[12]  S. Redner,et al.  Organization of growing random networks. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Directed scale-free graphs , 2003, SODA '03.

[14]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The Web as a Graph: Measurements, Models, and Methods , 1999, COCOON.

[15]  G. Yule,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evolution, Based on the Conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis, F.R.S. , 1925 .

[16]  Svante Janson,et al.  Functional limit theorems for multitype branching processes and generalized Pólya urns , 2004 .

[17]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Algorithms, Games, and the Internet , 2001, ICALP.

[18]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[19]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[20]  Eli Upfal,et al.  Stochastic models for the Web graph , 2000, Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[21]  H. Bunke,et al.  T. E. Harris, The Theory of Branching Processes (Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 119). XVI + 230 S. m. 6 Fig. Berlin/Göttingen/Heidelberg 1963. Springer‐Verlag. Preis geb. DM 36,— , 1965 .

[22]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  The Diameter of a Scale-Free Random Graph , 2004, Comb..

[23]  Russell C. Coile,et al.  Lotka's frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1977, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[24]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Bose-Einstein condensation in complex networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[25]  Amin Saberi,et al.  On the spread of viruses on the internet , 2005, SODA '05.

[26]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  High Degree Vertices and Eigenvalues in the Preferential Attachment Graph , 2005, Internet Math..

[27]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  Evolution of page popularity under random web graph models , 2006, PODS '06.

[28]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  A general model of web graphs , 2003, Random Struct. Algorithms.