Excitability of human upper limb motoneurones during rhythmic discharge tested with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

1. The activity of thirty‐one single motor units (SMUs) was recorded from forearm and hand muscles of three volunteers. The excitability of the rhythmically firing motoneurones supplying these SMUs was examined after voluntary discharge using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). 2. The magnetic stimulus was delivered either at a fixed delay (range: 1‐60 ms) after SMU discharge (triggered mode) or at random with respect to voluntary SMU discharge (random mode). Post‐stimulus time histograms (PSTHs) of responses to 50‐100 stimuli were constructed for each experimental condition. 3. In the triggered mode, the probability of response to TMS progressively decreased as the spike‐to‐stimulus interval was shortened. Shortening of the interval also resulted in redistribution of responses within the different subpeaks characterizing the short‐latency response of motor units to TMS: the relative response probability of the first subpeak decreased with the shorter spike‐to‐stimulus intervals. 4. In the triggered mode, the probability of SMU responding to TMS was significantly higher when the firing rate of the motor unit was increased from a slow rate (< 10 impulses s‐1) to a faster rate (> 12 impulses s‐1), irrespective of the spike‐to‐stimulus interval. In contrast, in the random mode, the response probability was greater at the slower discharge rate. 5. The higher excitability of motoneurones at the fast rate in the triggered mode is consistent with findings in cat motoneurones suggesting a shallower after‐hyperpolarization, but other mechanisms could contribute. Furthermore, our results suggest that there is an asymptotic recovery in the excitability of slow firing motoneurones towards the end of the interspike interval.

[1]  D. L. Tuck,et al.  Investigation of intercostal neuronal intracellular processes and connectivity by signal analysis and computer simulation , 1977 .

[2]  B. Day,et al.  Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  K. Mills,et al.  Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  B. Day,et al.  Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp , 1991, Experimental physiology.

[5]  E. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  Changes in presynaptic inhibition of Ia fibres in man while standing. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  P. Ellaway,et al.  THE ORIGINS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF CROSS‐CORRELATED ACTIVITY BETWEEN γ‐MOTONEURONES IN THE CAT , 1985 .

[7]  W H Calvin,et al.  Three modes of repetitive firing and the role of threshold time course between spikes. , 1974, Brain research.

[8]  E. Evarts,et al.  Motor Cortex control of finely graded forces. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  W. Calvin Generation of spike trains in CNS neurons , 1975, Brain Research.

[10]  R. Lemon,et al.  Recruitment of motor units in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in man. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  J C Rothwell,et al.  Changes in the response to magnetic and electrical stimulation of the motor cortex following muscle stretch in man. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  M Crawford,et al.  Direct comparison of corticospinal volleys in human subjects to transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  E. Fetz,et al.  Functional classes of primate corticomotoneuronal cells and their relation to active force. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  S. Miller,et al.  Excitation of the corticospinal tract by electromagnetic and electrical stimulation of the scalp in the macaque monkey. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  R. Lemon,et al.  Contribution of the monkey corticomotoneuronal system to the control of force in precision grip. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  G. Baumgartner,et al.  Human alpha motoneurone discharge, a statistical analysis. , 1974, Brain Research.

[17]  B. Gustafsson,et al.  Firing behaviour of a neurone model based on the afterhyperpolarization conductance time course and algebraical summation. Adaptation and steady state firing. , 1974, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[18]  R N Lemon,et al.  Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  K. Mills Magnetic brain stimulation: a tool to explore the action of the motor cortex on single human spinal motoneurones , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.