Joint cosmological and gravitational-wave population inference using dark sirens and galaxy catalogues

In the absence of numerous gravitational-wave detections with confirmed electromagnetic counterparts, the"dark siren"method has emerged as a leading technique of gravitational-wave cosmology. The method allows redshift information of such events to be inferred statistically from a catalogue of potential host galaxies. Due to selection effects, dark siren analyses necessarily depend on the mass distribution of compact objects and the evolution of their merger rate with redshift. Informative priors on these quantities will impact the inferred posterior constraints on the Hubble constant ($H_0$). It is thus crucial to vary these unknown distributions during an $H_0$ inference. This was not possible in earlier analyses due to the high computational cost, restricting them to either excluding galaxy catalogue information, or fixing the gravitational-wave population mass distribution and risking introducing bias to the $H_0$ measurement. This paper introduces a significantly enhanced version of the Python package GWCOSMO, which allows joint estimation of cosmological and compact binary population parameters. This thereby ensures the analysis is now robust to a major source of potential bias. The gravitational-wave events from the Third Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalogue are reanalysed with the GLADE+ galaxy catalogue, and an updated, more reliable measurement of $H_0=69^{+12}_{-7}$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ is found (maximum a posteriori probability and 68% highest density interval). This improved method will enable cosmological analyses with future gravitational-wave detections to make full use of the information available (both from galaxy catalogues and the compact binary population itself), leading to promising new independent bounds on the Hubble constant.

[1]  Anson Chen,et al.  Testing the nature of gravitational wave propagation using dark sirens and galaxy catalogues , 2023, 2309.03833.

[2]  A. Ghosh,et al.  Joint population and cosmological properties inference with gravitational waves standard sirens and galaxy surveys , 2023, Physical Review D.

[3]  S. Mastrogiovanni,et al.  Binary black holes population and cosmology in new lights: Signature of PISN mass and formation channel in GWTC-3 , 2022, 2204.13495.

[4]  Benjamin Dan Wandelt,et al.  Cross-correlating dark sirens and galaxies: measurement of $H_0$ from GWTC-3 of LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA , 2022, 2203.03643.

[5]  D. Holz,et al.  Spectral Sirens: Cosmology from the Full Mass Distribution of Compact Binaries. , 2022, Physical review letters.

[6]  S. Mukherjee The redshift dependence of black hole mass distribution: Is it reliable for standard sirens cosmology? , 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[7]  David O. Jones,et al.  A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s−1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[8]  C. Messenger,et al.  A pixelated approach to galaxy catalogue incompleteness: Improving the dark siren measurement of the Hubble constant , 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[9]  P. K. Panda,et al.  Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3 , 2021, Physical Review X.

[10]  P. K. Panda,et al.  Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC–3 , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.

[11]  P. K. Panda,et al.  GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run , 2021, 2111.03606.

[12]  B. Wandelt,et al.  GLADE+: An extended galaxy catalogue for multimessenger searches with advanced gravitational-wave detectors , 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[13]  R. Nichol,et al.  Euclid preparation: I. The Euclid Wide Survey , 2021, 2108.01201.

[14]  S. Mukherjee,et al.  Mapping the cosmic expansion history from LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA in synergy with DESI and SPHEREx , 2021, 2107.12787.

[15]  J. Gair,et al.  On the importance of source population models for gravitational-wave cosmology , 2021, Physical Review D.

[16]  A. Melchiorri,et al.  In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions , 2021, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[17]  M. Maggiore,et al.  Cosmology with LIGO/Virgo dark sirens: Hubble parameter and modified gravitational wave propagation , 2021, 2101.12660.

[18]  J. R. Palamos,et al.  Sensitivity and performance of the Advanced LIGO detectors in the third observing run , 2020, Physical Review D.

[19]  Salvatore Vitale,et al.  Inferring the properties of a population of compact binaries in presence of selection effects , 2020, 2007.05579.

[20]  S. More,et al.  Incompleteness Matters Not: Inference of H0 from Binary Black Hole–Galaxy Cross-correlations , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[21]  B. Wandelt,et al.  Accurate precision cosmology with redshift unknown gravitational wave sources , 2020, 2007.02943.

[22]  D. Gerdes,et al.  A Statistical Standard Siren Measurement of the Hubble Constant from the LIGO/Virgo Gravitational Wave Compact Object Merger GW190814 and Dark Energy Survey Galaxies , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[23]  Y.Fujii,et al.  Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history , 2020, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics.

[24]  Y. N. Liu,et al.  Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger , 2019, Proceedings of Multifrequency Behaviour of High Energy Cosmic Sources - XIII — PoS(MULTIF2019).

[25]  M. Fishbach,et al.  A Future Percent-level Measurement of the Hubble Expansion at Redshift 0.8 with Advanced LIGO , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[26]  B. Wandelt,et al.  Probing the theory of gravity with gravitational lensing of gravitational waves and galaxy surveys , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[27]  J. Gair,et al.  Cosmological inference using gravitational wave standard sirens: A mock data analysis , 2019, Physical Review D.

[28]  L. Verde,et al.  Tensions between the early and late Universe , 2019, Nature Astronomy.

[29]  J. Speagle dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[30]  Leo Singer,et al.  healpy: equal area pixelization and spherical harmonics transforms for data on the sphere in Python , 2019, J. Open Source Softw..

[31]  B. A. Boom,et al.  Edinburgh Research Explorer First measurement of the Hubble constant from a dark standard siren using the Dark Energy Survey galaxies and the LIGO/Virgo binary-black-hole merger GW170814 , 2018 .

[32]  J. Gair,et al.  Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[33]  B. Wandelt,et al.  Beyond the classical distance-redshift test: cross-correlating redshift-free standard candles and sirens with redshift surveys , 2018, 1808.06615.

[34]  M. Fishbach,et al.  Does the Black Hole Merger Rate Evolve with Redshift? , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[35]  Adam D. Myers,et al.  Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[36]  J. K. Blackburn,et al.  A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant , 2017, Nature.

[37]  B. A. Boom,et al.  GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[38]  The Ligo Scientific Collaboration,et al.  GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral , 2017, 1710.05832.

[39]  David R. Silva,et al.  The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design , 2016, 1611.00036.

[40]  M. Oguri Measuring the distance-redshift relation with the cross-correlation of gravitational wave standard sirens and galaxies , 2016, 1603.02356.

[41]  C. Broeck,et al.  Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , 2014, 1408.3978.

[42]  Jonathan R. Gair,et al.  Cosmology using advanced gravitational-wave detectors alone , 2011, 1108.5161.

[43]  W. D. Pozzo Inference of cosmological parameters from gravitational waves: Applications to second generation interferometers , 2011, 1108.1317.

[44]  Eduardo Serrano,et al.  LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products , 2008, The Astrophysical Journal.

[45]  K. Gorski,et al.  HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere , 2004, astro-ph/0409513.

[46]  C. Kochanek,et al.  The K-Band Galaxy Luminosity Function , 2000, astro-ph/0011456.

[47]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Cosmic Star-Formation History , 1996, 1403.0007.

[48]  L. Finn,et al.  Gravitational radiation, inspiraling binaries, and cosmology , 1993, gr-qc/9304020.

[49]  B. Schutz Determining the Hubble constant from gravitational wave observations , 1986, Nature.

[50]  M. J. Williams,et al.  GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run , 2021, Physical Review D.

[51]  P. K. Panda,et al.  GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object , 2020 .

[52]  Karsten Danzmann,et al.  Increasing the Astrophysical Reach of the Advanced Virgo Detector via the Application of Squeezed Vacuum States of Light , 2019 .

[53]  The VIRGO Collaboration , 2010 .

[54]  W. Bonnor,et al.  Gravitational Radiation , 1958, Nature.

[55]  S. Klimenko,et al.  Advanced LIGO , 2014, 1411.4547.