Evidence for an activation locus of the word-frequency effect in lexical decision.

The authors report a lexical decision experiment designed to determine whether activation is the locus of the word-frequency effect. K. R. Paap and L. S. Johansen (1994) reported that word frequency did not affect lexical decisions when exposure durations were brief; they accounted for this by proposing that data-limited conditions prevented late-occurring verification processes. Subsequently, P. A. Allen, A. F. Smith, M. Lien, T. A. Weber, and D. J. Madden (1997) and K. R. Paap, L. S. Johansen, E. Chun, and P. Vonnahme (2000) reported additional evidence that word-frequency effects do and do not have an activation locus, respectively. The authors further tested this issue in a lexical decision experiment using data-limited procedures--predicted by verification models to eliminate word-frequency effects. The authors observed word-frequency effects using individually determined exposure durations that were only 1 screen cycle longer than the exposure duration that yielded chance performance. Word-frequency effects persisted even when an adjusted measure of performance was used.

[1]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[2]  P. Allen,et al.  Perhaps the lexicon is coded as a function of word frequency. , 1992 .

[3]  T. R. Jordan,et al.  Position-specific masking and the word-letter phenomenon: Reexamining the evidence from the Reicher-Wheeler paradigm. , 1996 .

[4]  S. Sternberg,et al.  The meaning of additive reaction-time effects: tests of three alternatives , 1993 .

[5]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  D. Madden,et al.  Word frequency effects at brief exposure durations: comment on Paap and Johansen (1994). , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Philip A Allen,et al.  Age differences in central (semantic) and peripheral processing: the importance of considering both response times and errors. , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[8]  L E Krueger,et al.  A theory of perceptual matching. , 1978, Psychological review.

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[10]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  Perceiving exterior letters of words: differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter-fragment masks. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[14]  G. E. MacKinnon,et al.  Reading Research Advances in Theory and Practice , 1985 .

[15]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[16]  Phillip L. Emerson,et al.  Holism revisited: evidence for parallel independent word-level and letter-level processors during word recognition , 1991 .

[17]  Neighborhood frequency does affect performance in the Reicher task: encoding or decision? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Jeremy W. Grabbe,et al.  Differential age effects for case and hue mixing in visual word recognition. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[19]  Michael Garman,et al.  Psycholinguistics: Accessing the mental lexicon , 1990 .

[20]  Poulton Ec.  Searching for newspaper headlines printed in capitals or lower-case letters. , 1967 .

[21]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[22]  D J Madden,et al.  Evidence for a parallel input serial analysis model of word processing. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  K. Paap,et al.  Discrete threshold versus continuous strength models of perceptual recognition. , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[24]  David J. Madden,et al.  Evidence for a parallel input serial analysis model of word processing. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.

[26]  E C Poulton,et al.  Searching for newspaper headlines printed in capitals or lower-case letters. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. , 1994 .

[28]  R. Hyman.  Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Allen R. Dobbs,et al.  Frequency Effects in Lexical Decisions: A Test of the Verification Model , 1985 .

[31]  B Wallace,et al.  Influence of case type, word frequency, and exposure duration on visual word recognition. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  C. A. Becker.  Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  D J Madden,et al.  Influence of age and processing stage on visual word recognition. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[34]  Kenneth R. Paap,et al.  The case of the vanishing frequency effect: A retest of the verification model. , 1994 .

[35]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[36]  Sharon M. Thomas,et al.  Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.