Perceived Shifts of Flashed Stimuli by Visible and Invisible Object Motion

Perceived positions of flashed stimuli can be altered by motion signals in the visual field—position capture (Whitney and Cavanagh, 2000 Nature Neuroscience 3 954–959). We examined whether position capture of flashed stimuli depends on the spatial relationship between moving and flashed stimuli, and whether the phenomenal permanence of a moving object behind an occluding surface (tunnel effect; Michotte 1950 Acta Psychologica 7 293–322) can produce position capture. Observers saw two objects (circles) moving vertically in opposite directions, one in each visual hemifield. Two horizontal bars were simultaneously flashed at horizontally collinear positions with the fixation point at various timings. When the movement of the object was fully visible, the flashed bar appeared shifted in the motion direction of the circle. But this position-capture effect occurred only when the bar was presented ahead of or on the moving circle. Even when the motion trajectory was covered by an opaque surface and the bar was flashed after complete occlusion of the circle, the position-capture effect was still observed, though the positional asymmetry was less clear. These results show that movements of both visible and ‘hidden’ objects can modulate the perception of positions of flashed stimuli and suggest that a high-level representation of ‘objects in motion’ plays an important role in the position-capture effect.

[1]  Friedrich W. Fröhlich,et al.  Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit , 1924, Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[2]  Michael T. Tolston,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Movement Constraints on Interpersonal Coordination and Communication , 2014 .

[3]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Shifts in perceived position of flashed stimuli by illusory object motion , 2002, Vision Research.

[4]  David Whitney,et al.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  M. Schlag-Rey,et al.  Through the eye, slowly; Delays and localization errors in the visual system , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  K. Watanabe Perceptual grouping by motion precedes relative localisation of visual stimuli , 2002 .

[7]  D. Perrett,et al.  Neuronal representation of disappearing and hidden objects in temporal cortex of the macaque , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Perceptual organization of moving stimuli modulates the flash-lag effect. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking , 2001, Cognition.

[10]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Sensorimotor integration compensates for visual localization errors during smooth pursuit eye movements. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[12]  David Whitney,et al.  Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Kazumichi Matsumiya,et al.  Distortion of Visual Space During Pursuit Eye Movements , 2000 .

[14]  Paul van Donkelaar,et al.  Spatiotemporal modulation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements. , 1999 .

[15]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Perceptual Priming by Invisible Motion , 1999 .

[16]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking Multiple Items Through Occlusion: Clues to Visual Objecthood , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern , 1999, Nature.

[18]  P. van Donkelaar,et al.  Spatiotemporal modulation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[19]  R. Snowden,et al.  Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion , 1998, Current Biology.

[20]  S Shimojo,et al.  Attentional Modulation in Perception of Visual Motion Events , 1998, Perception.

[21]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Latency of saccades during smooth-pursuit eye movement in man Directional asymmetries , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Perceived geometrical relationships affected by eye-movement signals , 1997, Nature.

[23]  David C. Burr,et al.  Compression of visual space before saccades , 1997, Nature.

[24]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Seeing Two as One: Linking Apparent Motion and Repetition Blindness , 1997 .

[25]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of Basic Features , 1997, Vision Research.

[27]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Stimulus-driven facilitation and inhibition of visual information processing in environmental and retinotopic representations of space. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement , 1996, Vision Research.

[29]  Scott N. J. Watamaniuk,et al.  Seeing motion behind occluders , 1995, Nature.

[30]  S. Yantis Perceived Continuity of Occluded Visual Objects , 1995 .

[31]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Neuronal correlates of inferred motion in primate posterior parietal cortex , 1995, Nature.

[32]  S. McKee,et al.  Detecting a trajectory embedded in random-direction motion noise , 1995, Vision Research.

[33]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Perceived surface shape not features determines correspondence strength in apparent motion , 1994, Vision Research.

[34]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[35]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual motion and attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Surfaces versus features in visual search , 1992, Nature.

[37]  K Nakayama,et al.  Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. , 1992, Science.

[38]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Apparent motion can survive binocular rivalry suppression , 1991, Vision Research.

[40]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. , 1991, Vision research.

[42]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Illusory Displacement of Equiluminous Kinetic Edges , 1990, Perception.

[44]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[46]  Z. Pylyshyn The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model , 1989, Cognition.

[47]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[49]  N. Kanwisher Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.

[50]  R N Shepard,et al.  Path-guided apparent motion. , 1983, Science.

[51]  L. Mitrani,et al.  Retinal location and visual localization during pursuit eye movement , 1982, Vision Research.

[52]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[53]  Kenneth R. Boff,et al.  Vernier offset produced by rotary target motion , 1976 .

[54]  L. Matin Eye Movements and Perceived Visual Direction , 1972 .

[55]  J. Gibson,et al.  The change from visible to invisible: , 1969 .

[56]  J J Gibson,et al.  The problem of temporal order in stimulation and perception. , 1966, The Journal of psychology.

[57]  A. Michotte,et al.  Les compléments amodaux des structures perceptives , 1964 .

[58]  A. Michotte The perception of causality , 1963 .

[59]  Luke A. Burke,et al.  On the Tunnel Effect , 1952 .

[60]  A. Michotte,et al.  A propos de la permanence phénoménale faits et theories , 1950 .

[61]  J. Schauer,et al.  Extrapolating Movement without Retinal Motion , 2022 .