Towards a thesaurus of plant characteristics: an ecological contribution

Ecological research produces a tremendous amount of data, but the diversity in scales and topics covered and the ways in which studies are carried out result in large numbers of small, idiosyncratic data sets using heterogeneous terminologies. Such heterogeneity can be attributed, in part, to a lack of standards for acquiring, organizing and describing data. Here, we propose a terminological resource, a Thesaurus Of Plant characteristics (TOP), whose aim is to harmonize and formalize concepts for plant characteristics widely used in ecology. TOP concentrates on two types of plant characteristics: traits and environmental associations. It builds on previous initiatives for several aspects: (i) characteristics are designed following the entity-quality (EQ) model (a characteristic is modelled as the ‘Quality’ of an ‘Entity’ ) used in the context of Open Biological Ontologies; (ii) whenever possible, the Entities and Qualities are taken from existing terminology standards, mainly the Plant Ontology (PO) and Phenotypic Quality Ontology (PATO) ontologies; and (iii) whenever a characteristic already has a definition, if appropriate, it is reused and referenced. The development of TOP, which complies with semantic web principles, was carried out through the involvement of experts from both the ecology and the semantics research communities. Regular updates of TOP are planned, based on community feedback and involvement. TOP provides names, definitions, units, synonyms and related terms for about 850 plant characteristics. TOP is available online (www.top-thesaurus.org), and can be browsed using an alphabetical list of characteristics, a hierarchical tree of characteristics, a faceted and a free-text search, and through an Application Programming Interface. Synthesis. Harmonizing definitions of concepts, as proposed by TOP, forms the basis for better integration of data across heterogeneous data sets and terminologies, thereby increasing the potential for data reuse. It also allows enhanced scientific synthesis. TOP therefore has the potential to improve research and communication not only within the field of ecology, but also in related fields with interest in plant functioning and distribution.

[1]  Shawn Bowers,et al.  The New Bioinformatics: Integrating Ecological Data from the Gene to the Biosphere , 2006 .

[2]  William K. Michener,et al.  Meta-information concepts for ecological data management , 2006, Ecol. Informatics.

[3]  Isabelle Mougenot,et al.  A Semantic Web Faceted Search System for Facilitating Building of Biodiversity and Ecosystems Services , 2014, DILS.

[4]  C. Raunkiær,et al.  The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography , 1934 .

[5]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[6]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Cynthia L. Smith,et al.  Integrating phenotype ontologies across multiple species , 2010, Genome Biology.

[8]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Methods in Comparative Plant Ecology , 1993, Springer Netherlands.

[9]  Martin Hermy,et al.  The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life‐history traits of the Northwest European flora , 2008 .

[10]  L. Stein,et al.  Gramene: Development and Integration of Trait and Gene Ontologies for Rice , 2002, Comparative and functional genomics.

[11]  Shawn Bowers,et al.  Advancing ecological research with ontologies. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Joshua S Madin,et al.  A generic structure for plant trait databases , 2011 .

[13]  Ruprecht Düll,et al.  Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa , 1992 .

[14]  B. Enquist,et al.  Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Plant functional types: are we getting any closer to the Holy Grail? , 2007 .

[16]  Isabelle Mougenot,et al.  ThesauForm - Traits: A web based collaborative tool to develop a thesaurus for plant functional diversity research , 2012, Ecol. Informatics.

[17]  A. J. Underwood,et al.  Identifying and understanding ecological preferences for habitat or prey , 2004 .

[18]  C. Violle,et al.  Let the concept of trait be functional , 2007 .

[19]  Brendan Choat,et al.  A unique web resource for physiology, ecology and the environmental sciences: PrometheusWiki , 2010 .

[20]  Matthew B. Jones,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities of Open Data in Ecology , 2011, Science.

[21]  Barry Smith,et al.  Ontologies as integrative tools for plant science. , 2012, American journal of botany.

[22]  H. Sofia Pinto,et al.  Ontologies: How can They be Built? , 2004, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[23]  Eric Garnier,et al.  A trait-based approach to comparative functional plant ecology: concepts, methods and applications for agroecology. A review , 2012, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[24]  Barry Smith,et al.  Semantics in Support of Biodiversity Knowledge Discovery: An Introduction to the Biological Collections Ontology and Related Ontologies , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  P. Bryan Heidorn,et al.  Shedding Light on the Dark Data in the Long Tail of Science , 2008, Libr. Trends.

[26]  Steve Kelling,et al.  Data-Intensive Science: A New Paradigm for Biodiversity Studies , 2009 .

[27]  Hajo Rijgersberg,et al.  Ontology of units of measure and related concepts , 2013, Semantic Web.

[28]  Alastair H. Fitter,et al.  The ecological flora database. , 1994 .

[29]  Marie-Angélique Laporte,et al.  A Thesaurus for Soil Invertebrate Trait-Based Approaches , 2014, PloS one.

[30]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Plant Functional Diversity: Organism traits, community structure, and ecosystem properties , 2016 .

[31]  Barry Smith,et al.  The Plant Ontology as a Tool for Comparative Plant Anatomy and Genomic Analyses , 2012, Plant & cell physiology.

[32]  Laura M. Jackson,et al.  Finding Our Way through Phenotypes , 2015, PLoS biology.

[33]  William K. Michener,et al.  NONGEOSPATIAL METADATA FOR THE ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES , 1997 .

[34]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Disturbance response in vegetation – towards a global perspective on functional traits , 1999 .

[35]  P. Bannister,et al.  Godley review: A touch of frost? Cold hardiness of plants in the southern hemisphere , 2007 .

[36]  C. Webb,et al.  Scaling from Traits to Ecosystems: Developing a General Trait Driver Theory via Integrating Trait-Based and Metabolic Scaling Theories , 2015, 1502.06629.

[37]  Matthew B Jones,et al.  Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  Nathan Wilson,et al.  TraitBank: Practical semantics for organism attribute data , 2016, Semantic Web.

[39]  Barry W. Brook,et al.  Ecology Needs a Convention of Nomenclature , 2014 .

[40]  A. Budden,et al.  Big data and the future of ecology , 2013 .

[41]  S. Higgins,et al.  TRY – a global database of plant traits , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[42]  Shawn Bowers,et al.  An ontology for describing and synthesizing ecological observation data , 2007, Ecol. Informatics.

[43]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference , 2009 .

[44]  P. Reich,et al.  New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2013 .

[45]  William K. Michener,et al.  Ecological Data: Design, Management and Processing , 2000 .