Ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring devices for evaluating transient loss of consciousness or other related symptoms

Capturing electrocardiograms (ECGs) during spontaneous events is the most powerful available tool to identify or exclude an arrhythmic cause of symptoms, and often can elucidate the definite diagnosis for different conditions, such as transient loss of consciousness (T‐LOC), lightheadedness, or palpitations. Current ambulatory ECG monitoring technologies include 24‐hour Holter, wearable event recorder, external loop recorder (ELR), and insertable cardiac monitoring (ICM). Of them, Holter ECG is most frequently used in daily practice in Japan, while ELR and ICM are less frequently used. However, the appropriate monitor choice should be based on the expected frequency of symptoms. Frequent events may be adequately detected by Holter ECG, but less frequent symptoms are more effectively assessed by longer‐term monitoring (i.e., ELR or ICM). In this report, based on our clinical experience, we review the usefulness of ambulatory ECG monitoring devices, especially of ELR, for evaluating T‐LOC and other potentially arrhythmia‐related symptoms. Specifically, we focus on the use of ELR and ICM for evaluating Japanese patients with T‐LOC.

[1]  Lluís Mont,et al.  Value of the implantable loop recorder for the management of patients with unexplained syncope. , 2004, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  A. Skanes,et al.  A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[3]  T. Asano,et al.  Usefulness of External Loop Recorder in Patients with Palpitation , 2014 .

[4]  Haruhiko Abe,et al.  Reflex syncope during a hot bath as a specific cause of drowning in Japan , 2013 .

[5]  C. Garutti,et al.  Early versus delayed implantation of a loop recorder in patients with unexplained syncope--effects on care pathway and diagnostic yield. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[6]  G. Divine,et al.  Incremental diagnostic yield of loop electrocardiographic recorders in unexplained syncope. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  R Yee,et al.  Randomized Assessment of Syncope Trial: Conventional Diagnostic Testing Versus a Prolonged Monitoring Strategy , 2001, Circulation.

[8]  P. Zimetbaum,et al.  Ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring: choosing the right device. , 2010, Circulation.

[9]  J. Reiffel,et al.  Comparison of autotriggered memory loop recorders versus standard loop recorders versus 24-hour Holter monitors for arrhythmia detection. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  J. Blanc,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009) The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) , 2009 .

[11]  J. Alpert,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the North American Society for P , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Frank Beckers,et al.  Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Λίλιαν Μάντζιαρη,et al.  2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. , 2018, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[14]  Jonathan H Seltzer,et al.  The Diagnosis of Cardiac Arrhythmias: A Prospective Multi‐Center Randomized Study Comparing Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry Versus Standard Loop Event Monitoring , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[15]  Suneet Mittal,et al.  Ambulatory external electrocardiographic monitoring: focus on atrial fibrillation. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Y. Oginosawa,et al.  Characteristics of syncope in Japan and the Pacific rim. , 2013, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[17]  A. Brandes,et al.  Use of an implantable loop recorder to increase the diagnostic yield in unexplained syncope: results from the PICTURE registry , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  M. Brignole,et al.  The usage and diagnostic yield of the implantable loop-recorder in detection of the mechanism of syncope and in guiding effective antiarrhythmic therapy in older people. , 2005, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[19]  N. Freemantle,et al.  The clinical impact of implantable loop recorders in patients with syncope. , 2006, European heart journal.