Automatic modulation classification (AMC) is a signal processing approach to determine a received signal’s modulation scheme without any a priori information about that signal’s configuration. Three main approaches have been proposed for this task, namely Likelihood-based, Feature-based and Distribution Test-based AMC. Each of these approaches has different levels of computational complexity affecting their ability to conduct AMC in real-time and achieving different levels of modulation classification accuracy. Thus, there is a trade-off between computational complexity and classification accuracy in this domain. This paper investigates the real-world scenarios of AMC applications with the emphasis on the two most feasible low-complexity approaches: Feature-based (FB) and Distribution Test-based (DT) AMC. This study has specifically evaluated these approaches with focus on their classification accuracy and their computational complexity. For comprehensive evaluation purposes the study encompassed signals utilizing 8-ASK, 8-FSK, 32-PSK and 32-QAM modulation schemes, as representatives of the most prominent modulation schemes in current wireless systems. Our analysis shows that DT classifiers exhibit on average a 17.5% lower computational complexity than the investigated FB classifier, with about on average 12% higher classification accuracy in SNRs in the range of 0 to 10 dB. On the other hand, the DT approach classifiers show not only on average 31% higher computational complexity than the FB classifier, but it also has an approximately 10% lower classification accuracy for SNRs in the range of -10 to 0 dB.
[1]
Hamid Sharif,et al.
Accuracy Analysis of Feature-based Automatic Modulation Classification with Blind Modulation Detection
,
2019,
2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC).
[2]
Hamid Sharif,et al.
Performance Evaluation of Feature-based Automatic Modulation Classification
,
2018,
2018 12th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS).
[3]
Fanggang Wang,et al.
Fast and Robust Modulation Classification via Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
,
2010,
IEEE Transactions on Communications.
[4]
Ali Abdi,et al.
Survey of automatic modulation classification techniques: classical approaches and new trends
,
2007,
IET Commun..
[5]
Jun Won Choi,et al.
Enhanced modulation classification algorithm based on Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
,
2017,
2017 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC).
[6]
Fanggang Wang,et al.
Low complexity Kolmogorov-Smirnov modulation classification
,
2011,
2011 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.