Numerical investigation of the optimal control rule for decision‐making in fisheries management

:  Recently, control rules (CR) have been widely used for decision-making of fisheries management. A CR describes fishing pressure (usually fishing mortality, F) as a function of some other variable(s) related to the status of the stock. The prevailing CR aim to achieve FMSY. The main idea of CR is to change fishing pressure based on stock conditions. Therefore, it seems irrational that the goals of prevailing CR are defined by the constant harvesting rate (CHR) strategy. The objective of the present study was to develop a method by which to numerically search for the optimal CR, apart from the traditional biological reference points based on CHR. I also compared the performance of the optimal CR and those of the prevailing CR (FMSY, 75%FMSY, New Management Procedure of the International Whaling Committee and the CR in US guidelines). The result suggested that the limitation of maximum fishing mortality was effective for stocks with low natural mortality and large stock size estimation error, while the biomass threshold was effective for stocks with short longevity and small estimation error. This means that the optimal CR is sensitive to the life history and uncertainty of the stock. Therefore, there seems to be no ‘one-size-fits-all’ rule for fish stocks.

[1]  Bernt-Erik Sæther,et al.  THRESHOLD HARVESTING FOR SUSTAINABILITY OF FLUCTUATING RESOURCES , 1997 .

[2]  C. Walters,et al.  Fixed exploitation rate strategies for coping with effects of climate change , 1996 .

[3]  C. Walters,et al.  Alternative Harvest Strategies for Pacific Herring (Clupea harengus pallasi) , 1988 .

[4]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  In search of thresholds for recruitment overfishing , 1994 .

[5]  H. Matsuda,et al.  Population reproductive potential: Evaluation of long-term stock productivity , 2002 .

[6]  André E. Punt,et al.  Experiences in the evaluation and implementation of management procedures , 1999 .

[7]  C. Walters,et al.  Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: Choice, dynamics and uncertainty , 2004, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[8]  J. F. Caddy,et al.  Limit reference points, traffic lights, and holistic approaches to fisheries management with minimal stock assessment input , 2002 .

[9]  Joseph E. Powers,et al.  Precautionary control rules in US fisheries management: specification and performance , 1999 .

[10]  G A Rose,et al.  Hyperaggregation of fish and fisheries: how catch-per-unit-effort increased as the northern cod (Gadus morhua) declined , 1999 .

[11]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Exploitation rate reference points for West Coast rockfish: Are they robust and are there better alternatives? , 2002 .

[12]  K. Cochrane,et al.  Reconciling sustainability, economic efficiency and equity in fisheries: the one that got away? , 2000 .

[13]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  THE DARK SIDE OF REFERENCE POINTS , 2002 .