Decomposition‐based quantitative electromyography: Methods and initial normative data in five muscles

Quantitative electromyographic (EMG) techniques provide clinically useful information to aid in the diagnosis and follow the course or response to treatment of diseases affecting the motor system. The purpose of this study was to describe a decomposition‐based quantitative electromyography method (DQEMG) designed to obtain clinically applicable information relating to motor unit potential (MUP) size and configuration, and motor unit (MU) firing characteristics. Additionally, preliminary normative data were obtained from the deltoid, biceps brachii, first dorsal interosseous, vastus medialis, and tibialis anterior muscles of 13 control subjects. DQEMG was capable of efficiently and accurately extracting MUP data from complex interference patterns during mild to moderate contractions. MUP amplitude, surface‐detected MUP (S‐MUP) amplitude, MUP duration, number of phases, and MU firing frequencies varied significantly across muscles. The mean parameter values for the individual muscles studied were similar to previous reports based on other quantitative methods. The main advantages of this method are the speed of data acquisition and processing, the ability to obtain MUPs from MUs with low and higher recruitment thresholds, and the ability to obtain both S‐MUP or macro‐MUP data as well as MU firing rate information. Muscle Nerve 28: 204–211, 2003

[1]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  ACTION POTENTIAL PARAMETERS IN DIFFERENT HUMAN MUSCLES , 1955, Acta psychiatrica et neurologica Scandinavica.

[2]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  Motor unit potentials at different ages. , 1962, Archives of neurology.

[3]  G. Somjen,et al.  Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  E Stålberg,et al.  Macro EMG, a new recording technique. , 1980, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  E Stålberg,et al.  Macro EMG in healthy subjects of different ages. , 1982, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  K. McGill,et al.  Automatic decomposition electromyography (ADEMG): validation and normative data in brachial biceps. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Analysis of amplitude and area of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  L J Dorfman,et al.  AAEE minimonograph #29: Automatic quantitative electromyography , 1988, Muscle & nerve.

[9]  E Stålberg,et al.  Reference values of motor unit action potentials obtained with multi‐MUAP analysis , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[10]  T Doherty,et al.  Methods for Estimating the Numbers of Motor Units in Human Muscles , 1995, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[11]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Multi‐motor unit action potential analysis (MMA) , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  D W Stashuk,et al.  Decomposition and quantitative analysis of clinical electromyographic signals. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  R. Conwit,et al.  The relationship of motor unit size, firing rate and force , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  D W Stashuk,et al.  Detecting single fiber contributions to motor unit action potentials , 1999, Muscle & nerve.