Material Productivity and Environmental Degradation: Moderating Role of Environment-Related Technologies in Achieving Carbon Neutrality

[1]  Huaping Sun,et al.  Influence of green technology, green energy consumption, energy efficiency, trade, economic development and FDI on climate change in South Asia , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[2]  A. Alola,et al.  Do bureaucratic policy and socioeconomic factors moderate energy utilization effect of net zero target in the EU? , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  Chiwei Su,et al.  Renewable energy and technological innovation: Which one is the winner in promoting net-zero emissions? , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[4]  Divine Q. Agozie,et al.  Can technological innovation, foreign direct investment and natural resources ease some burden for the BRICS economies within current industrial era? , 2022, Technology in Society.

[5]  J. Hussain,et al.  Globalization, industrialization, and urbanization in Belt and Road Initiative countries: implications for environmental sustainability and energy demand , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[6]  M. Islam,et al.  An assessment of the effect of green innovation, income, and energy use on consumption-based CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from emerging nations BRICS , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[7]  Daniel Balsalobre-lorente,et al.  Towards Achieving Eco-Efficiency in Top 10 Polluted Countries: The Role of Green Technology and Natural Resource Rents , 2022, Gondwana Research.

[8]  M. Usman,et al.  Do Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy, and Environmental-Related Technologies Asymmetrically Reduce Ecological Footprint? Evidence from Pakistan , 2022, Energies.

[9]  Zeeshan Fareed,et al.  Financial inclusion and the environmental deterioration in Eurozone: The moderating role of innovation activity , 2022, Technology in Society.

[10]  Avik Sinha,et al.  Financial development, renewable energy and CO2 emission in G7 countries: New evidence from non-linear and asymmetric analysis , 2022, Energy Economics.

[11]  Zhaohua Wang,et al.  The moderating role of financial development in the renewable energy consumption - CO2 emissions linkage: The case study of Next-11 countries , 2022, Energy.

[12]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  ICT and education as determinants of environmental quality: The role of financial development in selected Asian countries , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[13]  M. Usman,et al.  Environmental concern in the era of industrialization: Can financial development, renewable energy and natural resources alleviate some load? , 2022, Energy Policy.

[14]  Z. Arshad,et al.  Do economic policy uncertainty and environment-related technologies help in limiting ecological footprint? , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[15]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Globalization and CO2 Emissions in the Presence of EKC: A Global Panel Data Analysis , 2022, Gondwana Research.

[16]  Muhammad Zubair Mumtaz,et al.  The dynamic nexus among financial development, renewable energy and carbon emissions: Moderating roles of globalization and institutional quality across BRI countries , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[17]  Avik Sinha,et al.  Do the shocks in technological and financial innovation influence the environmental quality? Evidence from BRICS economies , 2022, Technology in Society.

[18]  Buhari Doğan,et al.  The role of environmental technology for energy demand and energy efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries , 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[19]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  Clean energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: What is the role of economic policy uncertainty? , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[20]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Does interaction between technological innovation and natural resource rent impact environmental degradation in newly industrialized countries? New evidence from method of moments quantile regression , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[21]  L. Chu.  Determinants of ecological footprint in OCED countries: do environmental-related technologies reduce environmental degradation? , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[22]  A. Bashir,et al.  How do financial development, energy consumption, natural resources, and globalization affect Arctic countries' economic growth and environmental quality? An advanced panel data simulation , 2021, Energy.

[23]  O. Usman,et al.  Effects of domestic material consumption, renewable energy, and greenhouse gas emissions on environmental sustainability in the EU-28: Evidence from GMM panel-VAR , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[24]  Manzoor Ahmad,et al.  Do international collaborations in environmental-related technology development in the U.S. pay off in combating carbon dioxide emissions? Role of domestic environmental innovation, renewable energy consumption, and trade openness , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[25]  A. Rehman,et al.  Impact of renewable energy consumption, financial development and natural resources on environmental degradation in OECD countries with dynamic panel data , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[26]  Recep Ulucak,et al.  The effect of nuclear energy on the environment nexus in the context of globalization: Consumption vs production-based CO2 emissions , 2021, Nuclear Engineering and Technology.

[27]  Avik Sinha,et al.  Financial development and environmental degradation: Do human capital and institutional quality make a difference? , 2021, Gondwana Research.

[28]  Avik Sinha,et al.  The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy consumption, financial development, and CO2 emissions: evidence from selected Asian countries , 2021, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[29]  A. Zakari,et al.  Role of financial development, environmental-related technologies, research and development, energy intensity, natural resource depletion, and temperature in sustainable environment in Canada , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[30]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  Modelling the dynamic linkages between eco-innovation, urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprints for G7 countries: Does financial globalization matter? , 2021, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[31]  Muhammad Tariq Majeed,et al.  Globalization, financial development, and environmental sustainability: evidence from heterogenous income groups of Asia , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[32]  K. Ajide,et al.  Nonrenewable and renewable energy consumption, trade openness, and environmental quality in G-7 countries: the conditional role of technological progress , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[33]  Eyup Dogan,et al.  The role of institutional quality and environment-related technologies in environmental degradation for BRICS , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[34]  N. Rostami,et al.  Macroeconomic Conditions, Innovation and Competitiveness , 2021, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

[35]  F. Hasanov,et al.  Theoretical Framework for the Carbon Emissions Effects of Technological Progress and Renewable Energy Consumption , 2021, Sustainable Development.

[36]  Shafaqat Ali,et al.  Evaluating eco-efficiency in consumption and production through sustainable utilization of resources: A panel analysis of APAC by population , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[37]  Adnan Safi,et al.  Does Energy Productivity and Technological Innovation Limit Trade-Adjusted Carbon Emissions? , 2020, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja.

[38]  Eyup Dogan,et al.  International trade and environmental performance in top ten‐emitters countries: The role of eco‐innovation and renewable energy consumption , 2020 .

[39]  O. Usman,et al.  Domestic material consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the EU ‐28 countries: Implications for environmental sustainability targets , 2020 .

[40]  Arif Sari,et al.  Are eco-innovation and export diversification mutually exclusive to control carbon emissions in G-7 countries? , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[41]  K. Tang,et al.  Does fiscal decentralization and eco‐innovation promote sustainable environment? A case study of selected fiscally decentralized countries , 2020 .

[42]  Sadia Mansoor,et al.  Analysing the role of environment-related technologies and carbon emissions in emerging economies: a step towards sustainable development , 2020, Environmental technology.

[43]  Yu Bai,et al.  Is green technology vertical spillovers more significant in mitigating carbon intensity? Evidence from Chinese industries , 2020 .

[44]  Chiwei Su,et al.  Trade and technological innovation: The catalysts for climate change and way forward for COP21. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[45]  Danish,et al.  An assessment of the environmental sustainability corridor: Investigating the non‐linear effects of environmental taxation on CO 2 emissions , 2020, Sustainable Development.

[46]  Qichang Xie,et al.  How does foreign direct investment affect CO2 emissions in emerging countries?New findings from a nonlinear panel analysis , 2020 .

[47]  Danish,et al.  Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization , 2020 .

[48]  Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie,et al.  Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[49]  E. Hertwich.  Increased carbon footprint of materials production driven by rise in investments , 2019, Nature Geoscience.

[50]  J. Duro,et al.  What causes inequality in Material Productivity between countries? , 2019, Ecological Economics.

[51]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Material efficiency strategies to reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with buildings, vehicles, and electronics—a review , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[52]  M. Sabir,et al.  An empirical investigation of the determinants of CO2 emissions: evidence from Pakistan , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[53]  J. Giesekam,et al.  Bridging the climate mitigation gap with economy‐wide material productivity , 2018, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[54]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Global Material Flows and Resource Productivity: Forty Years of Evidence , 2018 .

[55]  Florian Flachenecker,et al.  The causal impact of material productivity on microeconomic competitiveness and environmental performance in the European Union , 2018, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.

[56]  Gaoxiang Gu,et al.  Research on global carbon abatement driven by R&D investment in the context of INDCs , 2018 .

[57]  Y. F. Fernández,et al.  Innovation for sustainability: The impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions , 2018 .

[58]  Hsin-Ning Su,et al.  Does innovation respond to climate change? Empirical evidence from patents and greenhouse gas emissions , 2017 .

[59]  E. Worrell,et al.  Energy demand for materials in an international context , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[60]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Material flows and resource productivity in China, South Korea and Japan from 1970 to 2008: A transitional perspective , 2017 .

[61]  Wenji Zhou,et al.  Dynamics of material productivity and socioeconomic factors based on auto-regressive distributed lag model in China , 2016 .

[62]  Sakiru Adebola Solarin,et al.  Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis and the role of globalization in selected African countries , 2016 .

[63]  Masaru Yarime,et al.  Improving urban metabolism study for sustainable urban transformation , 2015 .

[64]  S. Managi,et al.  Special issue: studies on industrial ecology , 2015 .

[65]  M. Wagner,et al.  COINTEGRATING POLYNOMIAL REGRESSIONS: FULLY MODIFIED OLS ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE , 2011, Econometric Theory.

[66]  B. Baltagi,et al.  A Lagrange Multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model , 2012 .

[67]  E. Dumitrescu,et al.  Testing for Granger Non-causality in Heterogeneous Panels , 2012 .

[68]  Shunsuke Managi,et al.  Waste generations and efficiency measures in Japan , 2012 .

[69]  Heinz Schandl,et al.  Material Flows and Material Productivity in China, Australia, and Japan , 2012 .

[70]  Kate Scott,et al.  Link between climate change mitigation and resource efficiency: A UK case study , 2012 .

[71]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Driving the human ecological footprint , 2007, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[72]  M. Pesaran.  General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels , 2004, Empirical Economics.

[73]  E. Rosa,et al.  STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts , 2003 .

[74]  M. Pesaran.  A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence , 2003 .

[75]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Climate Change and Society , 1998, Annual Review of Sociology.

[76]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[77]  Anil K. Bera,et al.  A test for normality of observations and regression residuals , 1987 .

[78]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: The moderating role of technological innovations , 2022, Resources Policy.

[79]  Usama Awan,et al.  How do technological innovation and fiscal decentralization affect the environment? A story of the fourth industrial revolution and sustainable growth , 2021 .

[80]  Patrícia Hipólito Leal,et al.  The environmental impacts of globalisation and corruption: Evidence from a set of African countries , 2021 .

[81]  Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie,et al.  Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[82]  Florian Flachenecker,et al.  The causal impact of material productivity on macroeconomic competitiveness in the European Union , 2018 .

[83]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Industrial ecology in integrated assessment models , 2017 .

[84]  J. Westerlund.  Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data , 2006 .

[85]  Adrian Pagan,et al.  The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics , 1980 .