Organizational Rules and the "Bureaucratic Personality"

Theory: Theories of the bureaucratic personality by Victor Thompson and Robert Merton hold that personal characteristics of certain bureaucrats make them prefer elaborate rules and regulations, so this study tests such a model. Yet some organizations really do need more rules, so the study also tests a bureaucratic organization model that predicts that characteristics of the organization determine members' preferences for rules. Prominent theories of bureaucracy also suggest that bureaucratic personalities should be more prevalent in public bureaucracies. Hypotheses: Personal characteristics of organizational managers determine their preferences for more rules, so managers higher on alienation and pessimism will perceive a need for more rules. Alternatively, organizational characteristics (such as layers of authority and number of records kept) determine managers' preferences for more rules, so that where there are low levels of such structural characteristics (e.g., few records kept), managers will perceive a need for more rules. Public sector managers should show more of the bureaucratic personality responses than private managers, and prefer more rules. Methods: Correlation and logistic regression analysis is used on data from the National Administrative Studies Project, a mail survey of managers in a wide variety of public and private organizations. Results: Both personal characteristics, such as alienation, and organizational characteristics, such as the number of records kept, show relations to preferences for more rules. Contrary to expectations and to much of the literature, managers in private organizations (mostly business firms) were more likely to prefer more rules than managers in public agencies.

[1]  Albert Breton,et al.  The logic of bureaucratic conduct , 1983 .

[2]  S. Bretschneider,et al.  The "Publicness Puzzle" in Organization Theory: A Test of Alternative Explanations of Differences between Public and Private Organizations* , 1994 .

[3]  H. Rainey,et al.  Public Agencies and Private Firms , 1983 .

[4]  R. Merton,et al.  Reader in Bureaucracy , 1952, The British Journal of Sociology.

[5]  B. Bozeman,et al.  Sector Context and Performance , 1987 .

[6]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organization Theory and Design , 1983 .

[7]  L. Hill.  Who Governs the American Administrative State? A Bureaucratic-Centered Image of Governance , 1991 .

[8]  S. Pandey.  Managerial perceptions of red tape , 1995 .

[9]  B. Steel,et al.  Job Satisfaction Among Early Labor Force Participants: Unexpected Outcomes in Public and Private Sector Comparisons , 1990 .

[10]  Robert A. Dahl,et al.  Politics, Economics, and Welfare. , 1953 .

[11]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Decision Making in Public and Private Organizations: A Test of Alternative Concepts of "Publicness" , 1990 .

[12]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design.@@@The Design and Understanding of Survey Questions. , 1982 .

[13]  H. Rainey,et al.  Goals, Rules, and Effectiveness in Public, Private, and Hybrid Organizations: More Evidence on Frequent Assertions About Differences , 1992 .

[14]  G. Judge,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Econometrics (2nd ed.). , 1986 .

[15]  Philip H. Mirvis,et al.  The Cynical Americans: Living and Working in an Age of Discontent and Disillusion , 1989 .

[16]  G. W. Grumet.  Tyranny of the Obsessional Character , 1991, Psychological reports.

[17]  G. Yukl,et al.  Leadership in Organizations , 1981 .

[18]  R. R. Blake,et al.  The Managerial Grid , 1994 .

[19]  G. Caiden.  What Really Is Public Maladministration , 1991 .

[20]  J. Baldwin,et al.  Perceptions of Public versus Private Sector Personnel and Informal Red Tape: Their Impact on Motivation , 1990 .

[21]  G. Judge,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1981 .

[22]  J. Weiss.  The powers of problem definition: The case of government paperwork , 1989 .

[23]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  Bureaucratic Structure and Personality , 1940 .

[24]  P. E. Crewson,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Public and Private Sector Entrant Quality , 1995 .

[25]  Nigel Nicholson,et al.  Career Systems in Crisis: Change and Opportunity in the Information Age , 1996 .