Potential of a geostationary geoCARB mission to estimate surface emissions of CO 2 , CH 4 and CO in a polluted urban environment: casestudy Shanghai

Abstract. This paper describes a numerical experiment to test the ability of the proposed geoCARB satellite to estimate emissions of trace gases (CO2, CH4 and CO) in the polluted urban environment of Shanghai. The meteorology over Shanghai is simulated with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for a 9-day period in August 2010. The meteorology includes water and ice clouds. The chemistry version of WRF (WRF-Chem V3.6.1) is used to predict the chemical composition, mass density and number density of aerosol species. Spectra in the bands measured by geoCARB are calculated, including the effects of polarisation and multiple scattering of radiation by clouds, aerosols and molecules. Instrument noise is added, and column-averaged trace-gas mole fractions are estimated from the noisy spectra using an algorithm based on that for the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) and the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) but adapted to geoCARB. As expected, the high aerosol loadings are challenging. However, when the retrieval algorithm is provided with regionally adjusted aerosol optical properties, as might be determined from observations of dark targets within the field of regard, the accuracies of retrieved concentrations are comparable to those reported earlier for geoCARB. Statistics of the errors in the retrieved column-averaged concentrations are used to predict the reduction in uncertainty of surface emissions possible with remotely sensed data.

[1]  Ralph A. Kahn,et al.  Sensitivity of multiangle imaging to natural mixtures of aerosols over ocean , 2001 .

[2]  Christopher W. O'Dell,et al.  Performance of a geostationary mission, geoCARB, to measure CO 2 , CH 4 and CO column-averaged concentrations , 2013 .

[3]  Michael Buchwitz,et al.  A remote sensing technique for global monitoring of power plant CO 2 emissions from space and related applications , 2010 .

[4]  Clive D Rodgers,et al.  Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[5]  J. Kumer,et al.  NASA ESTO Instrument Incybator Program (IIP) Tropospheric Infrared Mapping Spectrometers (TIMS) Demonstration of Multi-Layer CO Retrieval from Atmospheric Data Acquired Simultaneously in the Solar Reflective Region near 2330 nm and the Thermal Emissive Region near 4680 nm , 2009 .

[6]  Michael Buchwitz,et al.  MAMAP – a new spectrometer system for column-averaged methane and carbon dioxide observations from aircraft: instrument description and performance analysis , 2010 .

[7]  Aidan E. Roche,et al.  NASA ESTO IIP Tropospheric Infrared Mapping Spectrometers (TIMS) demonstration first deployment on an airship: Preliminary results , 2011 .

[8]  Jack Kumer,et al.  Modeling the 2.33 µm TIMS spectrometer radiometric noise: Implications for space applications , 2013, 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[9]  M. King,et al.  Bulk Scattering Properties for the Remote Sensing of Ice Clouds. Part II: Narrowband Models , 2005 .

[10]  D. Deirmendjian Electromagnetic scattering on spherical polydispersions , 1969 .

[11]  David G. Streets,et al.  Using CO2:CO Correlations to Improve Inverse Analyses of Carbon Fluxes , 2006 .

[12]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4) , 2009 .

[13]  Vincent-Henri Peuch,et al.  Forecasting global atmospheric CO 2 , 2014 .

[14]  Rebecca Castano,et al.  The ACOS CO 2 retrieval algorithm – Part 1: Description and validation against synthetic observations , 2011 .

[15]  J. Horowitz Chapter 52 The Bootstrap , 2001 .

[16]  T. Bond,et al.  Light Absorption by Carbonaceous Particles: An Investigative Review , 2006 .

[17]  Susan S. Kulawik,et al.  Impact of nonlinearity on changing the a priori of trace gas profile estimates from the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) , 2008 .

[18]  Jeroen A. H. W. Peters,et al.  Recent trends in global greenhouse gas emissions:regional trends 1970–2000 and spatial distributionof key sources in 2000 , 2005 .

[19]  Sean Crowell,et al.  Constraining regional greenhouse gas emissions using geostationary concentration measurements: a theoretical study , 2014 .

[20]  Aidan E. Roche,et al.  Progress in development of Tropospheric Infrared Mapping Spectrometers (TIMS): GeoCARB Greenhouse Gas (GHG) application , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[21]  Eric A. Kort,et al.  Space‐based observations of megacity carbon dioxide , 2012 .

[22]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Bulk Scattering Properties for the Remote Sensing of Ice Clouds. Part I: Microphysical Data and Models. , 2005 .

[23]  P. Rayner,et al.  The utility of remotely sensed CO2 concentration data in surface source inversions , 2001 .

[24]  Kevin Sawyer,et al.  Determination of technical readiness for an atmospheric carbon imaging spectrometer , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[25]  Kevin R. Gurney,et al.  A multiyear, global gridded fossil fuel CO2 emission data product: Evaluation and analysis of results , 2014 .

[26]  D. O'Brien,et al.  Sensitivity of remotely sensed trace gas concentrations to polarisation , 2015 .

[27]  Kevin Sawyer,et al.  GeoCARB design maturity and geostationary heritage , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.