Argument and Its Uses

The chapter raises an alarm about the direction that theorizing seems to be taking. For understandable reasons there has been a focus on the persuasive use of arguments to such a degree that many now define argument as a tool of persuasion. But there are plenty of other uses of arguments and it is possible, and indeed desirable, to define “argument” without reference to any particular use. Arguments are reasons for beliefs or for believing, reasons for attitudes or for emotions, or reasons for decisions about what to do—that is, in Mill’s phrase, “considerations … capable of determining the intellect either to give or withhold its assent.” It is important to focus on arguments so defined because we have not yet finished the job of providing a complete account of their logical norms. I sketch one way of framing their norms within the Toulmin model that assimilates a lot of the recent work of various theorists. And I join those who insist that assessing the logic of an argument is not all there is to evaluating arguments.

[1]  Aristotle The Complete Works Of Aristotle , 1954 .

[2]  C. Perelman,et al.  La nouvelle rhétorique , 1956 .

[3]  S. Toulmin The uses of argument , 1960 .

[4]  C. Perelman,et al.  La nouvelle rhétorique traité de l'argumentation , 1958 .

[5]  J. A. Blair,et al.  Logical Self-Defense , 1977 .

[6]  S. Toulmin,et al.  An introduction to reasoning , 1979 .

[7]  Theory of Argumentation and the Dialectical Garb of Formal Logic , 1982 .

[8]  Ch. Perelman The realm of rhetoric , 1982 .

[9]  P. Lorenzen Die Dialogische Begründung Von Logikkalkülen , 1982 .

[10]  E. M. Barth,et al.  Argumentation. Approaches to Theory Formation , 1984 .

[11]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Speech acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion (vertaling in het Russisch) , 1984 .

[12]  Critical Thinking: A Guide to Evaluating Information , 1984 .

[13]  T. Govier A practical study of argument , 1985 .

[14]  James B. Freeman,et al.  Thinking Logically: Basic Concepts for Reasoning , 1988 .

[15]  D. Walton,et al.  Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning , 1995 .

[16]  Nancy V. Wood Perspectives on Argument , 1995 .

[17]  D. Walton Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning , 1995 .

[18]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Fundamentals Of Argumentation Theory , 1996 .

[19]  J. A. Blair,et al.  Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory : A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments , 1997 .

[20]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Handboek van de argumentatietheorie. Historische achtergronden en hedendaagse ontwikkelingen [Vertaling van: 'Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Mawhaw N.J.] , 1997 .

[21]  The argument culture : moving from debate to dialogue , 1998 .

[22]  Ralph H. Johnson Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument , 2000 .

[23]  Robert C. Pinto,et al.  Argument, Inference and Dialectic, Collected Papers on Informal Logic with an Introduction by Hans V. Hansen , 2001, Argumentation Library.

[24]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach , 2003 .

[25]  J. A. Blair,et al.  Proceedings of the Fith Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation , 2003 .

[26]  D. Hitchcock Toulmin’s Warrants , 2003 .

[27]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Argument - critical thinking, logic and the fallacies (2. ed.) , 2004 .

[28]  F. V. Eemeren A systematic theory of argumentation , 2004 .

[29]  R. Sellars Rhetoric , 1996, The Classical Review.