Contrasting paradigms of design thinking: the building thermal simulation tool user vs. the building designer

This paper contrasts two different paradigms of design thinking: the one of the dynamic thermal simulation tool users with the one of the building designer. It shows that, in theory, the two paradigms seem to be incommensurable but complementary due to differences in knowledge and praxis between the two professions. The author discusses these differences side-by-side based on a review of the design science literature together with an analysis of the basic structure and knowledge involved in existing thermal simulation tools. This discussion aims to unfold a set of insights into the type of approach needed to move this research area further. It highlights the modus operandi of the building designer rather than focusing on collaborative efforts and sets up the backgrounds for designers to learn relevant concepts of building physics in an environment in which they can experiment with these concepts as ‘craftsmen’.

[1]  Leslie K. Norford,et al.  A design optimization tool based on a genetic algorithm , 2002 .

[2]  I. G. Capeluto,et al.  Advice tool for early design stages of intelligent facades based on energy and visual comfort approach , 2009 .

[3]  Kevin J. Lomas,et al.  Sensitivity analysis techniques for building thermal simulation programs , 1992 .

[4]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[5]  Spyridon Stravoravdis,et al.  A Proposed Method for Generating, Storing and Managing Large Amounts of Modelling Data Using Scripts and On-line Databases , 2005 .

[6]  P.J.C.J. De Wilde,et al.  Computational Support for the Selection of Energy Saving Building Components , 2004 .

[7]  André De Herde,et al.  A simple design tool for the thermal study of dwellings , 2002 .

[8]  Andrew Marsh.  Performance Modelling and Conceptual Design , .

[9]  Jae Min Kim,et al.  Improving communication in building simulation supported projects , 2009 .

[10]  Ardeshir Mahdavi,et al.  TOWARD A UNIFIED INFORMATION SPACE FOR THE SPECIFICATION OF BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION RESULTS , 2005 .

[11]  Christoph Morbitzer,et al.  APPLICATION OF DATA MINING TECHNIQUES FOR BUILDING SIMULATION PERFORMANCE PREDICTION ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[12]  Veronica I. Soebarto,et al.  DESIGNER ORIENTATED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF BUILDINGS , 1999 .

[13]  Ömer Akin,et al.  Variants in Design Cognition , 2001 .

[14]  Terrence A. Brooks,et al.  Designing Information Technology in the Postmodern Age: From Method to Metaphor, by Richard Coyne , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[15]  W. Newstetter,et al.  Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education , 2001 .

[16]  A. Okeil.  A holistic approach to energy efficient building forms , 2010 .

[17]  Joseph Andrew Clarke,et al.  Qualitative analysis of the usefulness of perceptualisation techniques in communicating building simulation outputs , 2005 .

[18]  John S. Gero,et al.  The Situated Function - Behaviour - Structure Framework , 2002, AID.

[19]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[20]  J. Mardaljevic.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of solar shading for a parametrically defined roof system , 2004 .

[21]  Konstantinos Papamichael,et al.  Product modeling for computer-aided decision-making , 1999 .

[22]  S. Flores Larsen,et al.  An experience on integrating monitoring and simulation tools in the design of energy-saving buildings , 2008 .

[23]  Leslie K. Norford,et al.  An evolutionary model for sustainable design , 2003 .

[24]  Christian Inard,et al.  Fast method to predict building heating demand based on the design of experiments , 2009 .

[25]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[26]  Farzin Haghparast,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF COMPUTER-OPTIMISED SOLUTIONS TO TIGHTLY DEFINED DESIGN PROBLEMS , 2006 .

[27]  Vasilije Kokotovich,et al.  Problem analysis and thinking tools: an empirical study of non-hierarchical mind mapping , 2008 .

[28]  Paola Sassi,et al.  Strategies for Sustainable Architecture , 2006 .

[29]  Konstantinos Papamichael.  Application of information technologies in building design decisions , 1999 .

[30]  V. Goel.  Sketches of thought , 1995 .

[31]  Shady Attia,et al.  "ARCHITECT FRIENDLY": A COMPARISON OF TEN DIFFERENT BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION TOOLS , 2009 .

[32]  Joseph Andrew Clarke,et al.  Communicating building simulation outputs to users , 2003 .

[33]  J. Lopreato,et al.  General system theory : foundations, development, applications , 1970 .

[34]  Christian Inard,et al.  A new methodology for the design of low energy buildings , 2009 .

[35]  Pieter de Wilde,et al.  INVOCATION OF BUILDING SIMULATION TOOLS IN BUILDING DESIGN PRACTICE , 1999 .

[36]  J A Clarke,et al.  The Development of an Intelligent , Integrated Building Design System Within the European COMBINE Project , 1998 .

[37]  David Latch Craig,et al.  Stalking Homo Faber: A Comparison of Research Strategies for Studying Design Behavior , 2001 .

[38]  G. Augenbroe,et al.  Integration of Simulation into the Building Design Process , 1991 .

[39]  Rivka Oxman.  Chapter 12 – The Mind in Design: A Conceptual Framework for Cognition in Design Education , 2001 .

[40]  A. Malkawi,et al.  Optimizing building form for energy performance based on hierarchical geometry relation , 2009 .

[41]  Magdy N. Yacoub,et al.  Plusminus 20°/40° Latitude: Sustainable Building Design in Tropical and Subtropical Regions , 2007 .

[42]  Francis Allard,et al.  Statistical interpretation of the results of building simulation and its use in design decisions , 2003 .

[43]  Ipek Ozkaya,et al.  Requirement-driven design: assistance for information traceability in design computing , 2005 .

[44]  Donald A. Schön.  Problems, frames and perspectives on designing , 1984 .

[45]  S Mazouz,et al.  The integration of environmental variables in the process of architectural design: The contribution of expert systems , 2001 .

[46]  Peter F. Smith.  Sustainability at the Cutting Edge: Emerging Technologies for Low Energy Buildings , 2007 .

[47]  Manfred Hegger,et al.  Energy Manual: Sustainable Architecture , 2008 .

[48]  Norbert Lechner,et al.  Heating, Cooling, Lighting: Design Methods for Architects , 1991 .

[49]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[50]  Pieter de Wilde,et al.  An interoperability workbench for design analysis integration , 2004 .

[51]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Sustainable Construction : Green Building Design and Delivery , 2005 .

[52]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[53]  Rajko Tomović,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of dynamic systems , 1963 .

[54]  S. Szokolay,et al.  Introduction to Architectural Science: The Basis of Sustainable Design , 2004 .

[55]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[56]  Mukyeong Kim,et al.  An underlying cognitive aspect of design creativity: Limited Commitment Mode control strategy , 2007 .

[57]  James P. Waltz.  Computerized Building Energy Simulation Handbook , 1999 .

[58]  Jlm Jan Hensen,et al.  Considerations regarding decision support tools for conceptual building design , 2006 .

[59]  Donald A. Schön.  Designing: Rules, types and worlds , 1988 .

[60]  Clarice Bleil De Souza.  A critical and theoretical analysis of current proposals for integrating building thermal simulation tools into the building design process , 2009 .

[61]  Ralph Eugen Hammann,et al.  Energy design for tomorrow , 2009 .

[62]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[63]  Michael Donn,et al.  Simulation in the Service of Design - Asking the Right Questions , 2009 .

[64]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  New Directions in Design Cognition: Studies of Representation and Recall , 2001 .

[65]  D. Michael UTZINGER,et al.  INTEGRATING ENERGY SIMULATION INTO THE DESIGN PROCESS OF HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDINGS : A CASE STUDY OF THE ALDO LEOPOLD LEGACY CENTER , 2009 .

[66]  Harry Collins,et al.  The one culture? : a conversation about science , 2001 .

[67]  H. Chauvet,et al.  Decision Making through Use of Interoperable Simulation Software , 1997 .

[68]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  The design analysis integration (DAI) initiative , 2003 .

[69]  Benjamin C. M. Fung,et al.  A decision tree method for building energy demand modeling , 2010 .

[70]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[71]  R. Busch,et al.  The Design of Energy-Responsive Commercial Buildings , 1984 .

[72]  G. Augenbroe,et al.  THE NEED FOR COMPUTATIONAL SUPPORT IN ENERGY-EFFICIENT DESIGN PROJECTS IN THE NETHERLANDS , 2001 .

[73]  John S. Gero,et al.  Tradeoff diagrams for the integrated design of the physical environment in buildings , 1980 .

[74]  André De Herde,et al.  Design of low energy office buildings , 2003 .

[75]  A. Goldberg.  General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. , 1969 .

[76]  R. Fuller,et al.  Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth , 1969 .

[77]  Dean Hawkes,et al.  The Environmental Tradition: Studies in the architecture of environment , 1995 .

[78]  Marie-Hélène Contal-Chavannes,et al.  Sustainable Design: Towards a New Ethic in Architecture and Town Planning , 2009 .

[79]  Halime Demirkan,et al.  Focus on architectural design process through learning styles , 2003 .

[80]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .

[81]  Klaus Daniels.  The Technology of Ecological Building: Basic Principles and Measures, Examples and Ideas , 1997 .

[82]  Ö. Akin.  Psychology of architectural design , 1986 .

[83]  Fuller Moore.  Environmental Control Systems: Heating, Cooling, Lighting , 1992 .

[84]  Jon Hand,et al.  Transferring simulation from specialists into design practice , 2005 .

[85]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[86]  André De Herde,et al.  A simple design tool for the thermal study of an office building , 2002 .

[87]  Ardeshir Mahdavi.  A comprehensive computational environment for performance based reasoning in building design and evaluation , 1999 .

[88]  R. G. Coyle,et al.  Introduction to system dynamics , 1996 .

[89]  Henry J. Cowan.  Solar energy applications in the design of buildings , 1980 .

[90]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Visual Analogy—a Strategy for Design Reasoning and Learning , 2001 .

[91]  A. Bryman.  Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[92]  Baruch Givoni,et al.  Man climate and architecture , 1969 .

[93]  William J. Mitchell,et al.  The Logic of Architecture: Design, Computation, and Cognition , 1992 .

[94]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  Method and simulation program informed decisions in the early stages of building design , 2010 .

[95]  Evangelos Grigoroudis,et al.  Towards a multi-objective optimization approach for improving energy efficiency in buildings , 2008 .

[96]  Denis Kelliher,et al.  Integrating building energy simulation in the design process , 2003 .

[97]  Michael Donn,et al.  QUALITY ASSURANCE-SIMULATION AND THE REAL WORLD , 1999 .

[98]  Peter Kroes,et al.  Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts , 2002 .

[99]  Joseph Andrew Clarke,et al.  Energy Simulation in Building Design , 1985 .

[100]  Roberto Gonzalo,et al.  Energy-Efficient Architecture: Basics for Planning and Construction , 2006 .

[101]  Andrew Marsh.  Integrating Performance Modelling into the Initial Stages of Design , .

[102]  D. Hamby.  A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models , 1994, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[103]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[104]  Joseph Andrew Clarke,et al.  The role of simulation in support of Internet-based energy services , 2004 .

[105]  Pieter de Wilde,et al.  Design analysis integration: supporting the selection of energy saving building components , 2002 .

[106]  Michael Donn,et al.  Simulation of Imagined Realities: Environmental Design Decision Support Tools in Architecture , 2004 .