The SST Turbulence Model with Improved Wall Treatment for Heat Transfer Predictions in Gas Turbines

Heat transfer is of key importance in many gas turbine components. Most of the CFD development in this area is focused on advanced turbulence model closures including second moment closure models, and so called Low-Reynolds (low-Re) number and two-layer turbulence models. However, in many cases CFD heat transfer predictions based on these standard models still show a large degree of uncertainty, which can be attributed to the use of the -equation as the turbulence scale equation and the associated limitations of the near wall treatment. The present paper demonstrates that an optimally formulated two-equation model in combination with advanced wall treatment can overcome many problems of previous models. The SST (Shear Stress Transport) model in combination with an automatic wall treatment and a model for transition from laminar to turbulent flow was implemented in CFX-5 and applied to different test cases. In all cases the SST model shows to be superior, as it gives more accurate predictions and is less sensitive to grid variations. NOMENCLATURE Symbols

[1]  B. J. Abu-Ghannam,et al.  Natural Transition of Boundary Layers—The Effects of Turbulence, Pressure Gradient, and Flow History , 1980 .

[2]  T. Coakley,et al.  Turbulence Modeling Validation, Testing, and Development , 1997 .

[3]  M. Ubaldi,et al.  Detailed Velocity and Turbulence Measurements of the Profile Boundary Layer in a Large Scale Turbine Cascade , 1996 .

[4]  B. A. Kader Temperature and concentration profiles in fully turbulent boundary layers , 1981 .

[5]  Wolfgang Rodi,et al.  Scrutinizing the k-ε Turbulence Model Under Adverse Pressure Gradient Conditions , 1986 .

[6]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[7]  M. Leschziner,et al.  Computational modelling of three-dimensional impinging jets with and without cross-flow using second-moment closure , 1995 .

[8]  Lars Davidson,et al.  Comparison of Near-wall Behavior and its Effect on Heat Transfer for k-omega and k-eps Turbulence Models in Rib-roughened 2D Channels , 2000 .

[9]  R. E. Mayle,et al.  The 1991 IGTI Scholar Lecture: The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines , 1991 .

[10]  A. Savill Further progress in the turbulence modelling of by-pass transition , 1993 .

[11]  D. Wilcox Turbulence modeling for CFD , 1993 .

[12]  R. E. Mayle,et al.  The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines , 1991 .

[13]  Yoshitaka Fukuyama,et al.  Calculation of Transitional Boundary Layers With an Improved Low-Reynolds-Number Version of the k–ε Turbulence Model , 1994 .

[14]  Tim Craft,et al.  Impinging jet studies for turbulence model assessment—II. An examination of the performance of four turbulence models , 1993 .

[15]  R. Langtry,et al.  PREDICTION OF TRANSITION FOR ATTACHED AND SEPARATED SHEAR LAYERS IN TURBOMACHINERY , 2002 .

[16]  M. A. Hoffman,et al.  Local Heat Transfer Downstream of an Abrupt Expansion in a Circular Channel With Constant Wall Heat Flux , 1984 .

[17]  W. Jones,et al.  The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence , 1972 .

[18]  F. R. Menter,et al.  Influence of freestream values on k-omega turbulence model predictions , 1992 .

[19]  M. W. Rubesin,et al.  Wall-function boundary conditions in the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations for complex compressible flows , 1983 .