Interference of irrelevant information in multisensory selection depends on attentional set

[1]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory distractor processing is modulated by spatial attention. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  S. Soto-Faraco,et al.  Multisensory enhancement of attention depends on whether you are already paying attention , 2019, Cognition.

[3]  C. Spence,et al.  Overt Spatial Attention Modulates Multisensory Selection , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Patrick Chun Kau Chu,et al.  Conflict monitoring in multi-sensory flanker tasks: Effects of cross-modal distractors on the N2 component , 2018, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical Regularities Modulate Attentional Capture , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal attentional control sets between vision and audition. , 2017, Acta psychologica.

[7]  Zhe Qu,et al.  The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[8]  J. Kawahara,et al.  Contingent attentional capture across multiple feature dimensions in a temporal search task. , 2016, Acta psychologica.

[9]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory top-down sets: Evidence for contingent crossmodal capture , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Christian Frings,et al.  The impact of the irrelevant: the task environment modulates the impact of irrelevant features in response selection. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  B. Hommel,et al.  Attentional control of the creation and retrieval of stimulus–response bindings , 2014, Psychological research.

[12]  C. Spence,et al.  Response interference in touch, vision, and crossmodally: beyond the spatial dimension , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  C. Spence,et al.  When vision influences the invisible distractor: tactile response compatibility effects require vision. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Top-down control of audiovisual search by bimodal search templates. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[15]  Y. Wada.  Crossmodal Contextual Effects of Tactile Flankers on the Detection of Visual Targets , 2011 .

[16]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Multisensory enhancement of attentional capture in visual search , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  C. Spence.  Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[18]  D. Senkowski,et al.  The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  N. Lavie.  Attention, Distraction, and Cognitive Control Under Load , 2010 .

[20]  C. Spence.  Crossmodal spatial attention , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Salvador Soto-Faraco,et al.  Assessing the role of attention in the audiovisual integration of speech , 2010, Inf. Fusion.

[22]  Charles Spence,et al.  Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cues: A review , 2009, Hearing Research.

[23]  Charles Spence,et al.  Response Requirements Modulate Tactile Spatial Congruency Evects for Example, given That the Body Can Adopt a Variety of Diverent Postures, a Tactile Sensation Arising , 2022 .

[24]  Charles Spence,et al.  Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cues , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Charles Spence,et al.  Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  R. A. Bailey.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: a Model Comparison Perspective, 2nd edn , 2005 .

[27]  Jason S. Chan,et al.  Auditory spatial attention assessed in a flanker interference task , 2005 .

[28]  N. Lavie.  Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  A Dissociation Between Attention and Selection , 2001, Psychological science.

[30]  P Bertelson,et al.  Directing spatial attention towards the illusory location of a ventriloquized sound. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[31]  C. Spence,et al.  The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  C. Spence,et al.  Attracting attention to the illusory location of a sound: reflexive crossmodal orienting and ventriloquism , 2000, Neuroreport.

[33]  B. Gibson,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  N. Lavie.  Visual feature integration and focused attention: Response competition from multiple distractor features , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  GPOWER: A general power analysis program , 1996 .

[36]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Information integration in perception and communication , 1996 .

[37]  N. Lavie.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  J. Theeuwes.  Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective , 1990 .

[41]  M. Braga,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis , 2018, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[42]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .