LCIA framework and cross-cutting issues guidance within the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative.

Increasing needs for decision support and advances in scientific knowledge within life cycle assessment (LCA) led to substantial efforts to provide global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) indicators under the auspices of the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. As part of these efforts, a dedicated task force focused on addressing several LCIA cross-cutting issues as aspects spanning several impact categories, including spatiotemporal aspects, reference states, normalization and weighting, and uncertainty assessment. Here, findings of the cross-cutting issues task force are presented along with an update of the existing UNEP-SETAC LCIA emission-to-damage framework. Specific recommendations are provided with respect to metrics for human health (Disability Adjusted Life Years, DALY) and ecosystem quality (Potentially Disappeared Fraction of species, PDF). Additionally, we stress the importance of transparent reporting of characterization models, reference states, and assumptions, in order to facilitate cross-comparison between chosen methods and indicators. We recommend developing spatially regionalized characterization models, whenever the nature of impacts shows spatial variability and related spatial data are available. Standard formats should be used for reporting spatially differentiated models, and choices regarding spatiotemporal scales should be clearly communicated. For normalization, we recommend using external normalization references. Over the next two years, the task force will continue its effort with a focus on providing guidance for LCA practitioners on how to use the UNEP-SETAC LCIA framework as well as for method developers on how to consistently extend and further improve this framework.

[1]  Zhen-wu Shi,et al.  Quantifying land-use change impacts on the dynamic evolution of flood vulnerability , 2017 .

[2]  A. Magurran,et al.  Fifteen forms of biodiversity trend in the Anthropocene. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Life cycle human health impacts of 875 pesticides , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  Manuele Margni,et al.  Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: findings of the scoping phase , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  M. Hauschild Spatial Differentiation in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: A decade of method development to increase the environmental realism of LCIA , 2006 .

[6]  Thomas P. Seager,et al.  Integration of MCDA Tools in Valuation of Comparative Life Cycle Assessment , 2012 .

[7]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[8]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Biodiversity impacts from water consumption on a global scale for use in life cycle assessment , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[10]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Common values in assessing health outcomes from disease and injury: disability weights measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.

[11]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Bias in normalization: Causes, consequences, detection and remedies , 2007 .

[12]  Patrick Rousseaux,et al.  Aid for aggregating the impacts in Life Cycle assessment , 2003 .

[13]  Annie Levasseur,et al.  Area of concern: a new paradigm in life cycle assessment for the development of footprint metrics , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[14]  E. Hertwich,et al.  A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment part I: LCA and decision analysis , 2001 .

[15]  B. D. Favis,et al.  Aggregated indicator to assess land use impacts in life cycle assessment (LCA) based on the economic value of ecosystem services , 2015 .

[16]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Spatial Variability and Uncertainty of Water Use Impacts from U.S. Feed and Milk Production. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Harmonizing the assessment of biodiversity effects from land and water use within LCA. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Do we need a paradigm shift in life cycle impact assessment? , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[20]  Enrico Benetto,et al.  Assessment of Life Cycle Impacts on Ecosystem Services: Promise, Problems, and Prospects. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  A. Antón,et al.  Towards consensus on land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative preliminary recommendations based on expert contributions , 2016 .

[22]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Background for spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment. The EDIP2003 methodology , 2004 .

[23]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 , 2016, Lancet.

[24]  T. Koellner,et al.  UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[25]  Manuele Margni,et al.  A proposal to measure absolute environmental sustainability in life cycle assessment , 2016 .

[26]  T. Koellner,et al.  Land use impacts on freshwater regulation, erosion regulation, and water purification: a spatial approach for a global scale level , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[27]  Rana Pant,et al.  Rethinking the area of protection "natural resources" in life cycle assessment. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Towards harmonizing natural resources as an area of protection in life cycle impact assessment , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[29]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Toward meaningful end points of biodiversity in life cycle assessment. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  3 Ecosystems and Human Well-being , 2022 .

[31]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative , 2004 .

[32]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[33]  R. Ries,et al.  A characterization model with spatial and temporal resolution for life cycle impact assessment of photochemical precursors in the United States , 2009 .

[34]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA , 1998 .

[35]  Dan J Stein,et al.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 , 2015, BDJ.

[36]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment , 2014, Science.

[37]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Weighting environmental effects: Analytic survey with operational evaluation methods and a meta-method , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[38]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[39]  Stephan Pfister,et al.  Enhancing comprehensive measurement of social impacts in S-LCA by including environmental and economic aspects , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[40]  Michael J. Lathuillière,et al.  The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE) , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[41]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Evidence-Based Health Policy--Lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study , 1996, Science.

[43]  Ottar Michelsen,et al.  How Well Does LCA Model Land Use Impacts on Biodiversity?--A Comparison with Approaches from Ecology and Conservation. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[44]  Magdalena Svanström,et al.  Using the planetary boundaries framework for setting impact-reduction targets in LCA contexts , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[45]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Uncertainty And Spatial Variability in European Multi-Media Fate Models. , 2007 .

[46]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Regionalized life cycle assessment: computational methodology and application to inventory databases. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[47]  Annie Levasseur,et al.  Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: progress and case study , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[48]  A. Cohen,et al.  Health effects of fine particulate matter in life cycle impact assessment: findings from the Basel Guidance Workshop , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[49]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators☆ , 1996 .

[50]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  The evolution of the Global Burden of Disease framework for disease, injury and risk factor quantification: developing the evidence base for national, regional and global public health action , 2005, Globalization and health.

[51]  S. Pfister,et al.  Analysis of water use impact assessment methods (part A): evaluation of modeling choices based on a quantitative comparison of scarcity and human health indicators , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[52]  Mehmet Berkun,et al.  Hydroelectric potential and environmental effects of multidam hydropower projects in Turkey , 2010 .

[53]  T. Koellner,et al.  Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: proposal of characterization factors based on functional diversity , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[54]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment , 2001 .

[55]  Thomas P. Seager,et al.  Normalization in Comparative Life Cycle Assessment to Support Environmental Decision Making , 2017 .

[56]  J. Bare Recommendation for land use impact assessment: first steps into framework, theory, and implementation , 2011 .

[57]  Dan J Stein,et al.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 , 2015, BDJ.

[58]  G. Norris,et al.  TRACI the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts , 2002 .

[59]  S. Pfister,et al.  Monthly water stress: spatially and temporally explicit consumptive water footprint of global crop production , 2014 .

[60]  Finkbeiner Matthias,et al.  Guidance on Organizational Life Cycle Assessment , 2015 .

[61]  Bernadette A. Thomas,et al.  Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.

[62]  G. Shaddick,et al.  Parameterization models for pesticide exposure via crop consumption. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[63]  M. Margni,et al.  Uncertainty and spatial variability in characterization factors for aquatic acidification at the global scale , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[64]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Understanding the complementary linkages between environmental footprints and planetary boundaries in a footprint–boundary environmental sustainability assessment framework , 2015 .

[65]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, Part I: a critical review. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[66]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Accounting for ecosystem services in Life Cycle Assessment, Part II: toward an ecologically based LCA. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[67]  Massimo Pizzol,et al.  Normalisation and weighting in life cycle assessment: quo vadis? , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[68]  Mirjam Kretzschmar,et al.  Disability weights for the Global Burden of Disease 2013 study. , 2015, The Lancet. Global health.

[69]  Mark Huijbregts,et al.  Surplus Ore Potential as a Scarcity Indicator for Resource Extraction , 2017 .

[70]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Quantifying Land Use Impacts on Biodiversity: Combining Species-Area Models and Vulnerability Indicators. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.