Mapping natura 2000 heathland in Belgium - an evaluation of ensemble classifiers for spaceborne angular CHRIS/Proba imagery

Natura 2000 is an ecological network of protected areas in the territory of the European Union (EU). With the introduction of the Habitats Directive in 1992, EU member states are obligated to report every six years the status of the Natura 2000 habitats so that better conservation policy can be formulated. This paper examines the use of angular hyperspectral CHRIS/Proba image for the mapping of heathland at a Belgian Natura 2000 site. We find that the use of angular images increases the overall classification rate as compared to using only the nadir image; with the incorporation of angular images the final mapping is also more homogenous with less salt and pepper effect. While the class accuracy of Calluna- and Erica-dominated heathlands are still low, class accuracy of Molinia-dominated heathland is generally more encouraging. Two tree-based ensemble classifiers, Random Forest (RF) and Adaboost, were compared with Support Vector Machines (SVM). When only the nadir image was used, SVM attained the highest accuracy. When angular images were included, all three classifiers obtained comparable accuracies though in general RF and Adaboost had faster training time. We also adopted an assessment approach which repeats the accuracy assessment in ten independent trials, instead of the common practice of having only one trial. Our results show that accuracy attainment can vary significantly among different trials and hence it is recommendable to have more than one trial in order that a more objective characterization of the classifiers is obtained. 1

[1]  Joydeep Ghosh,et al.  Investigation of the random forest framework for classification of hyperspectral data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  N. Webb,et al.  The traditional management of European heathlands , 2008 .

[3]  Yoav Freund,et al.  Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm , 1996, ICML.

[4]  Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan,et al.  Evaluation of random forest and adaboost tree-based ensemble classification and spectral band selection for ecotope mapping using airborne hyperspectral imagery , 2008 .

[5]  T H Blackstock,et al.  Repeatability of Phase 1 habitat survey. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Y. Dupont,et al.  Species composition, feeding specificity and larval trophic level of flower-visiting insects in fragmented versus continuous heathlands in Denmark , 2006 .

[7]  J. R. Sveinsson,et al.  Mapping of hyperspectral AVIRIS data using machine-learning algorithms , 2009 .

[8]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Enhanced algorithm performance for land cover classification from remotely sensed data using bagging and boosting , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification , 2003 .

[10]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[11]  Dhaval Vyas,et al.  Evaluation of classifiers for processing Hyperion (EO-1) data of tropical vegetation , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[12]  Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan,et al.  Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms for Land Cover Classification from Satellite Data , 2000 .

[13]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.