SENSe: Study of the Effectiveness of Neurorehabilitation on Sensation

Background. Sensory loss is common after stroke, with negative impact on exploration of the immediate environment, hand function, and return to daily activities. Objective. To compare the effectiveness of a perceptual-learning based sensory discrimination program versus non-specific exposure to sensory stimuli via passive movements and grasping of common objects. Methods. The authors conducted a randomized parallel-group controlled trial, with blinding of subjects, clinical assessors, and data analysts. Fifty subjects with impaired texture discrimination, limb position sense, and/or tactile object recognition (>6 weeks, median 48 weeks poststroke) were randomized to receive somatosensory discrimination training (n = 25) or repeated exposure to sensory stimuli (n = 25) in 60-minute sessions for a total of 10 hours. The primary outcome was change in a composite standardized somatosensory deficit (SSD) index following intervention. Follow-up was at 6 weeks and 6 months posttraining. Results. Between-group comparisons revealed a significantly greater improvement in sensory capacity following sensory discrimination training, t(47) = 2.75, P = .004, 1-tailed; mean between-group change = 11.1 SSD; confidence interval 3.0 to 19.2. Improvements were maintained at 6 weeks and 6 months. Conclusion. Sensory discrimination training can achieve significant improvements in functional sensory discrimination capacity after stroke. The clinically oriented training achieved transfer of training effects to novel stimuli. Our findings provide support for introducing SENSe discrimination training in rehabilitation of sensory deficits after stroke.

[1]  Sarah F Tyson,et al.  Sensory Loss in Hospital-Admitted People With Stroke: Characteristics, Associated Factors, and Relationship With Function , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[2]  A. Eagger Rehabilitation , 1960 .

[3]  S. Schabrun,et al.  Evidence for the retraining of sensation after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, Clinical rehabilitation.

[4]  L. Carey,et al.  Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  Leeanne M. Carey,et al.  Impaired Touch Discrimination After Stroke: A Quantiative Test , 1997 .

[6]  Thomas A Matyas,et al.  Training of Somatosensory Discrimination After Stroke: Facilitation of Stimulus Generalization , 2005, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[7]  Leeanne M. Carey,et al.  Somatosensory Loss after Stroke , 1995 .

[8]  P A Thompson,et al.  The Motor Activity Log-28 , 2006, Neurology.

[9]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMC medicine.

[10]  Lalit Kalra,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation 2009: old chestnuts and new insights. , 2010, Stroke.

[11]  L. Hedman,et al.  Sensory Dysfunction Following Stroke: Incidence, Significance, Examination, and Intervention , 2008, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[12]  J S Kim,et al.  Discriminative sensory dysfunction after unilateral stroke. , 1996, Stroke.

[13]  D. Nowak,et al.  Grip force control during object manipulation in cerebral stroke , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Leeanne M. Carey,et al.  Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation: Loss of somatic sensation , 2006 .

[15]  Thomas A Matyas,et al.  Impaired Discrimination of Surface Friction Contributes to Pinch Grip Deficit After Stroke , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[16]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  T. Schenkenberg,et al.  Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment , 1980, Neurology.

[18]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[19]  M. Annett A classification of hand preference by association analysis. , 1970, British journal of psychology.

[20]  P. van Riel,et al.  Sequential occupational dexterity assessment (SODA): a new test to measure hand disability. , 1996, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[21]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics.

[22]  K. Sathian Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation: Cross-modal plasticity in sensory systems , 2006 .

[23]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Right cerebral dominance in spatial attention. Further evidence based on ipsilateral neglect. , 1987, Archives of neurology.

[24]  W. Lankveld,et al.  Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment (SODA) , 1996 .

[25]  Sally Bennett,et al.  Interventions for sensory impairment in the upper limb after stroke. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[26]  J. Marler,et al.  Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. , 1989, Stroke.

[27]  P. Halligan,et al.  Current practice and clinical relevance of somatosensory assessment after stroke , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[28]  Mahoney Fi,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 1965 .

[29]  L. Carey,et al.  Evidence for the retraining of sensation after stroke remains limited. , 2010, Australian occupational therapy journal.

[30]  L. Carey,et al.  Impaired limb position sense after stroke: a quantitative test for clinical use. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.