Review of technical literature and trends related to automobile mass-reduction technology

Reducing the size, or mass, of automobiles is an important technology objective for fuel economy, carbon dioxide emissions, and vehicle performance. The authors review ongoing automotive trends for vehicle mass optimization to better characterize where automobile size is headed. They find that automakers are using a variety of advanced materials in new vehicle models such as aluminum, magnesium and plastic. Several studies, along with automakers’ announcements, suggest mass-reduction technology could achieve up to a 20 percent decrease in the mass of new vehicles in the 2015-1010 timeframe. Greater potential for future CO2 emission reductions, however, requires commercialization of more advanced mass-optimization technologies that go beyond near-term incremental approaches, and could yield mass reductions of 30 percent or greater. The authors suggest that commitments by automakers to deploy mass-reduction technology offer several policy implications.

[1]  Christopher R. Knittel,et al.  Automobiles on Steroids: Product Attribute Trade-Offs and Technological Progress in the Automobile Sector , 2009 .

[2]  C. H. Cáceres,et al.  Economical and Environmental Factors in Light Alloys Automotive Applications , 2007 .

[3]  H Friedrich,et al.  Research for a new age of magnesium in the automotive industry , 2001 .

[4]  C A Robinson,et al.  Lighten up , 1996, British Dental Journal.

[5]  John B. Heywood,et al.  ON THE ROAD IN 2020 - A LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF NEW AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGIES , 2000 .

[6]  F. Stodolsky,et al.  Technology and future prospects for lightweight plastic vehicle structures , 1997 .

[7]  Elmar Beeh,et al.  Super Light Car—lightweight construction thanks to a multi-material design and function integration , 2009 .

[8]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Factor of two : halving the fuel consumption of new U.S. Automobiles by 2035 , 2008 .

[9]  Glen Prater,et al.  IMPACT Phase II - Study to Remove 25% of the Weight from a Pick-up Truck , 2007 .

[10]  Donald E. Malen,et al.  Preliminary Vehicle Mass Estimation Using Empirical Subsystem Influence Coefficients , 2007 .

[11]  Anant D Vyas,et al.  Lightweight materials in the light-duty passenger vehicle market: Their market penetration potential and impacts , 1995 .

[12]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  Energy Efficiency, Fuel Economy, and Policy Implications , 2005 .

[13]  John M. DeCicco,et al.  Assessing the Fuel Economy Potential of Light-Duty Vehicles , 2001 .

[14]  Danilo J. Santini,et al.  Estimating trade-offs along the path to the PNGV 3X goal. , 2000 .

[15]  Emmanuel P Kasseris,et al.  On the Road in 2035 : Reducing Transportation ’ s Petroleum Consumption and GHG Emissions , 2008 .

[16]  Phillip Sharer,et al.  Fuel Economy Sensitivity to Vehicle Mass for Advanced Vehicle Powertrains , 2006 .

[17]  Yasunori Komatsu,et al.  Application of All Aluminum Automotive Body for HONDA NSX , 1991 .

[18]  Yasuo Muraoka,et al.  Development of an all-aluminum automotive body , 1993 .

[19]  M. K. Kulekci Magnesium and its alloys applications in automotive industry , 2008 .

[20]  Mark A. Delucchi,et al.  A Retail and Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2006 .

[21]  Thomas B. Glennan Strategies for Managing Vehicle Mass throughout the Development Process and Vehicle Lifecycle , 2007 .

[22]  John M. DeCicco,et al.  Trends in Technical Efficiency Trade-Offs for the U.S. Light Vehicle Fleet , 2007 .